Built from draft minutes printed in an agenda packet — no AI-written textBriefing final
The City's record
What the City's record shows
Draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-01-28, pp. 13–29; approved with amendments by the City Council on 2025-01-28 according to the City's minutes; the approving motion: “approve the minutes for the Regular City Council meeting of November 12, 2024 with an amendment to correct the vote on the motion that was held on Public Hearing item VI.7”; the amendment is quoted from that motion and is not applied in these records. The City has not posted the approved minutes.The approving motion, “to approve the minutes for the Regular City Council meeting of November 12, 2024 with an amendment to correct the vote on the motion that was held on Public Hearing item VI.7”, is in the City's minutes (2219_01_28_2025.pdf, p. 2).
Built only from this meeting's draft minutes (1692_01_28_2025_City_Council_Agenda_Packet.pdf, packet pp. 13–29). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.
Attendance (the roll call)
Listed present when the roll was taken: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss, Patricia Weeks
(Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines.)
Absences: the minutes print an “ABSENT” heading with no names under it.
Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Anthony A. Garganese (City Attorney), Stockton Whitten (City Manager), Monica Arsenault (City Clerk), Abigail Morgan (Public Works Director), Rebecca Bowman (Finance Director), Charlene Neuterman (Community Services Director), Samantha Senger (Communications and Economic Development Director), Evander Collier IV (Police Chief), Jonathan Lamm (Fire Chief), Jack Walsh (Utilities Director), Tammy Gemmati (Administrative Services Director), Corbin Gilbert (Help Desk Support Tech), Jennifer Webster (Senior Planner)
Named on at least one ballot later in the meeting: Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss, Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks (participation, which can differ from the roll: arrivals and departures are in the minutes' text)
Adopted actions (18)
1. Agenda: Regular Meeting of November 12, 2024. (24-653) — to approve the November 12, 2024 Regular City Council meeting agenda with amendments to move all Council Business items in front of Public Hearings, move Council Business item VII.6 to VII.1 and to table Council Business Item VII.1 to the next regularly scheduled Council meeting (moved by Alex Goins, seconded by Mike Blake); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 2, packet pp. 13–29
to approve the minutes for the Regular City Council meeting of August 27, 2024 as written (moved by Lavander Hearn, seconded by Alex Goins); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 2, packet pp. 13–29
to approve the minutes for the Budget Hearing of September 3, 2024 as written (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Alex Goins); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 2, packet pp. 13–29
to approve the Consent agenda (moved by Lavander Hearn, seconded by Lorraine Koss); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 4, packet pp. 13–29
1. Approval of Ordinance No. 17 -2024/first reading: Amending Chapter 2, Administration, Article VIII, Firefighters’ Retirement Plan of the — to approve Ordinance 17-2024 on First Reading (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Lavander Hearn); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 5, packet pp. 13–29
2. Approval of Ordinance No. 16-2024/1st reading: related to Chapter 2, Administration, Article VII Police Officers’ Retirement Plan; Amendi — to approve Ordinance 16-2024 on First Reading (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Lavander Hearn); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 6, packet pp. 13–29
3. Consideration of a Resolution of the City of Cocoa, Florida, electing to not exempt certain property from ad valorem taxation, as allowed — to approve the item (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Lorraine Koss); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 7, packet pp. 13–29
4. Council Consideration and Public Comment on the use of the FY2024 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance (JAG) Grant Program - Local So — to approve the item (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Alex Goins); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 7, packet pp. 13–29
5. Consideration of a Zoning Text Amendment to Appendix A, Article XIII, Section 22 of the City of Cocoa Code, amending tree protection and — to approve the item on First Reading (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Alex Goins); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 8, packet pp. 13–29
6. Consideration of a Zoning Text Amendment Appendix A, Article V of the code of the City of Cocoa to define Transportation Terminals, a per — to approve the item on First Reading (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Mike Blake); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 9, packet pp. 13–29
7. Consideration on this First Reading of an Expedited State Review Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment to City of Cocoa Future Land Use Eleme — to approve the item on First Reading (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Lavander Hearn); CARRIED — the draft minutes p. 10, packet pp. 13–29 the board corrected this vote when approving the minutes (to correct the vote on the motion that was held on Public Hearing item VI.7); the corrected vote is not in these records.
to install speed humps on Blake Aven ue only and to look at other traffic calming options for Stone Street (moved by Alex Goins, seconded by Mike Blake); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 11, packet pp. 13–29
2. Approval of the requested road closure changes for the 2024 Space Coast Marathon and Half due to the ongoing construction in Lee Wenner P — to approve the road closure changes (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Patricia Weeks); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 11, packet pp. 13–29
3. Approve the grant application of $49,000,000 for the FY24 Federal -State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail Grant Program offered b — to approve the item (moved by Lorraine Koss, seconded by Lavander Hearn); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 12, packet pp. 13–29
4. Approve a Resolution Amending the FY2025 Budget, BAF #25 -008-A, for purchase of a Monarch fire pumper truck from Sutphen Corporation for — to approve the item (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Patricia Weeks); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 12, packet pp. 13–29
5. Approve the requested 2025 street closures associated with the proposed Special Events. (24-646) — to approve the item (moved by Lorraine Koss, seconded by Patricia Weeks); CARRIED 4-1; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Alex Goins, Patricia Weeks; nays: Lorraine Koss — the draft minutes p. 13, packet pp. 13–29
to table this item in order to obtain further information (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Lavander Hearn); CARRIED 4-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Alex Goins, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 15, packet pp. 13–29
to adjourn the Regular meeting of November 12, 2024 (moved by Alex Goins, seconded by Lavander Hearn); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 16, packet pp. 13–29
Motions replaced by a restated or amended motion before any vote (1)
to install speed humps on Blake Avenue and Stone Street, for discussion (moved by Alex Goins, seconded by Mike Blake); replaced before any vote by the restated or amended motion that follows (motion 13) — the draft minutes p. 11, packet pp. 13–29
Money named in the minutes' motions (what each motion did with the amount, in its own words)
$13,263 — Council: Consent agenda item 2, approved with the Consent agenda (in draft minutes not approved as written (not counted as adopted): listed on an agenda item that an adopted motion approved as presented). “Approve a Resolution Amending the FY2025 Budget, Accepting the Bureau of Justice Assistance FY2024 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant, BAF# 25-006-A, in the amount of $13,263.” (motion result: CARRIED; the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-01-28 agenda packet (1692_01_28_2025_Ci; fiscal period not recorded) (draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-01-28, pp. 13–29; approved with amendments by the City Council on 2025-01-28 according to the City's minutes; the approving motion: “approve the minutes for the Regular City Council meeting of November 12, 2024 with an amendment to correct the vote on the motion that was held on Public Hearing item VI.7”; the amendment is quoted from that motion and is not applied in these records)
$15,653 — Council: in draft minutes not approved as written (not counted as adopted): listed on an agenda item that an adopted motion approved as presented. “Council Consideration and Public Comment on the use of the FY2024 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance (JAG) Grant Program - Local Solicitation in the amount of $15,653 ex post facto, and authorize the Grants Writer to submit the City’s application.” (motion result: CARRIED; the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-01-28 agenda packet (1692_01_28_2025_Ci; fiscal period not recorded) (draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-01-28, pp. 13–29; approved with amendments by the City Council on 2025-01-28 according to the City's minutes; the approving motion: “approve the minutes for the Regular City Council meeting of November 12, 2024 with an amendment to correct the vote on the motion that was held on Public Hearing item VI.7”; the amendment is quoted from that motion and is not applied in these records)
$1,119,995 — Council: in draft minutes not approved as written (not counted as adopted): listed on an agenda item that an adopted motion approved as presented. “Approve a Resolution Amending the FY2025 Budget, BAF #25 -008-A, for purchase of a Monarch fire pumper truck from Sutphen Corporation for $1,119,995.” (motion result: CARRIED; the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-01-28 agenda packet (1692_01_28_2025_Ci; fiscal period not recorded) (draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-01-28, pp. 13–29; approved with amendments by the City Council on 2025-01-28 according to the City's minutes; the approving motion: “approve the minutes for the Regular City Council meeting of November 12, 2024 with an amendment to correct the vote on the motion that was held on Public Hearing item VI.7”; the amendment is quoted from that motion and is not applied in these records)
$49,000,000 — Council: in draft minutes not approved as written (not counted as adopted): requested (grant application): the amount asked for in a grant APPLICATION the body approved or authorized (whether it was awarded is not in the record; not an adopted amount). “Approve the grant application of $49,000,000 for the FY24 Federal -State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail Grant Program offered by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for the construction of a Cocoa Multi-Modal Station.” (motion result: CARRIED; the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-01-28 agenda packet (1692_01_28_2025_Ci; fiscal period not recorded) (draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-01-28, pp. 13–29; approved with amendments by the City Council on 2025-01-28 according to the City's minutes; the approving motion: “approve the minutes for the Regular City Council meeting of November 12, 2024 with an amendment to correct the vote on the motion that was held on Public Hearing item VI.7”; the amendment is quoted from that motion and is not applied in these records)
Draft minutes, as printed in a later agenda packet
Draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-01-28, pp. 13–29; approved with amendments by the City Council on 2025-01-28 according to the City's minutes; the approving motion: “approve the minutes for the Regular City Council meeting of November 12, 2024 with an amendment to correct the vote on the motion that was held on Public Hearing item VI.7”; the amendment is quoted from that motion and is not applied in these records. The City has not posted the approved minutes.
MINUTES
City of Cocoa
Regular Meeting of The City Council
November 12, 2024
A Regular City Council Meeting was held on Tuesday, November 12 , 2024, in
Cocoa City Hall, in City Council Chambers, located at 65 Stone Street, in Cocoa,
Florida, 32922, as publicly noticed.
I. Opening Matters:
Mayor Blake called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
Deputy Mayor Hearn provided the invocation and Councilmember Weeks led the
assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance.
The City Clerk took the roll.
PRESENT: Michael C. Blake Mayor
Lavander Hearn Deputy Mayor
Alex Goins Councilmember
Lorraine Koss Councilmember
Patricia Weeks Councilmember
Anthony Garganese City Attorney
Stockton Whitten City Manager
Monica Arsenault City Clerk
ABSENT:
OTHER STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
Abby Morgan, Public Works Director; Rebecca Bowman, Finance Director;
Charlene Neuterman, Community Services Director; Samantha Senger,
Communications and Economic Development Director; Evander Collier , Police
Chief; Jonathan Lamm, Fire Chief; Jack Walsh, Utilities Director; Tammy Gemmati,
Administrative Services Director; Mitch Lawyer, Systems and Support Manager;
Corbin Gilbert, Help Desk Support Tech; and Jennifer Webster, Senior Planner.
Regular City Council Meeting 11-12-2024
Page | 2
II. Approval of Agenda and Minutes:
1. Agenda: Regular Meeting of November 12, 2024. (24-653).
* MOTION by Councilmember Goins; Seconded by Mayor Blake to approve the
November 12, 2024 Regular City Council meeting agenda with amendments
to move all Council Business items in front of Public Hearings, move Council
Business item VII.6 to VII.1 and to table Council Business Item VII.1 to the
next regularly scheduled Council meeting.
THE VOTE ON THE MOTION WAS:
AYES: Blake, Hearn, Goins, Koss, Weeks
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0)
2. Minutes: (a) Regular Meeting of August 27, 2024. (24-648).
(b) Budget Hearing of September 3, 2024. (24-650).
* MOTION by Deputy Mayor Hearn ; Seconded by Councilmember Goins to
approve the minutes for the Regular City Council meeting of August 27,
2024 as written.
THE VOTE ON THE MOTION WAS:
AYES: Blake, Hearn, Goins, Koss, Weeks
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0)
* MOTION by Councilmember Weeks; Seconded by Councilmember Goins to
approve the minutes for the Budget Hearing of September 3, 2024 as written.
THE VOTE ON THE MOTION WAS:
AYES: Blake, Hearn, Goins, Koss, Weeks
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0)
III. Awards and Presentations:
1. Hot Cocoa Holiday Presentation. (24-655). (Historic Cocoa Village Main Street)
IV. Delegations:
Stewart Buchanan, speaking on behalf of the property owner of 228 Beverly St.,
Cocoa, explained that the owner was not aware of the code liens against the
Regular City Council Meeting 11-12-2024
Page | 3
property but has since brought it up to compliance. He has been requesting a code
lien reduction since May but they have not been placed on a Code Enforcement
Agenda. Additionally, they have had a hard time in receiving a response from the
Code Enforcement Manager. He is hoping to get on an agenda soon.
Anthony Shacklock, 1708 Pineda St., Cocoa, spoke about several incidents he has
had with the Cocoa Police Department. He spoke about a stop sign approximately
two blocks from Cambridge Elementary that many people are running and nothing
is being done. Additionally, he experienced an incident where an aggressive dog
ran inside his own home and killed his cat. The last incident involved a fender
bender between himself and someone else . He got out of his vehicle and took
photos of the damage as well as the gentleman who hit his car. The gentleman
then proceeded to try and hit him with his car. In all of these instances his
experience with the Cocoa P olice Department was less than satisfactory. He
shared that he is losing hope with the Police Department and hopes something
can be done.
Paul Kamus, 116 Olive St., Cocoa, spoke about a main break incident that took
place near Cocoa Village that he called in to report. He provided Council with some
information on how to report main breaks if anyone comes across one.
V. Consent Agenda:
(A) General Consent Items:
1. Approve a Resolution to Amend the Financial Operations Manual (FOM) by
updating Section 5, Accounts Payable. (24-448). (Finance Director)
2. Approve a Resolution Amending the FY2025 Budget, Accepting the Bureau of
Justice Assistance FY2024 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant, BAF# 25-006-A, in
the amount of $13,263. Transfer the Match portion to the Grant Account Number
and replenish Fund Balanc e with the excess Budget, Project Number GR2502.
(24-592). (Police Chief)
3. Requesting settlement authority for the tentative settlement agreement between
former City of Cocoa Police Sergeant Nicholas Moon and the City of Cocoa
authorizing the payment of the Workers’ Compensation settlement. (24-611).
(Administrative Services Director)
4. Approve Amendment #1 to the Interlocal Agreement between the City of Cocoa
and the Diamond Square Community Redevelopment Agency for the Michael C.
Blake Subdivision. Approve A Resolution Amending the FY24 Budget, BAF#24 -
134-ITF. (24-636). (Community Services Director)
Regular City Council Meeting 11-12-2024
Page | 4
5. Approve a Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2025 Adopted Budget, BAF 25 -
001-A1 to A3, (Group#399) for the purchase orders rolled over to Fiscal Year 2025.
This is due to unspent funds budgeted for capital projects and specific operating
accounts. These f unds are provided using various Fund Balance Reserves and
other Revenue Sources. Allow for the City Manager to make any further
adjustments to the PO Roll, due to Retainage or Excess Budget. (24-644).
(Finance Director)
(B) Multi-Year Contracts:
6. To approve participation in a Cooperative Purchase Agreement with H&H Liquid
Sludge Disposal Inc., Branford, Florida, and Approve a Multi -year Contract from
FY2025 through FY2027 with two (2) one year extension options; To Authorize the
City Manager to Exe cute the Contract to provide certain services with respect to
biosolids transportation and disposal utilizing the City of Holly Hill’s Contract RFP#
24-WW-01: Sludge Removal, Hauling and Disposal Services effective through
June 27, 2027; To authorize th e City Manager to approve annual renewals and
associated Purchase Orders. (24-619). (Utilities Director)
7. Council Approval to Enter Into a Multi -Year Contract with Flock Safety for Four
Units for License Plate Readers to Assist in Crime Solving for the City. (24-621).
(Police Chief)
8. Approve a multi -year agreement (3 -Years) with a technology provider through
CDW-G, Inc. for software licenses and maintenance under the terms and
conditions of the Sourcewell 121923 CDWG -Software (121923) cooperative
agreement. Authorize the City Manager t o finalize and sign the agreement and
approve potential future additional licenses to be added to the agreement as
necessary each year and related purchase orders for FY 2026 and FY 2027. (24-
625). (Chief Technology Officer)
*****This Item is Confidential per FS 119.0725 and Not for Public Release******
* MOTION by Deputy Mayor Hearn ; Seconded by Councilmember Koss to
approve the Consent agenda.
THE VOTE ON THE MOTION WAS:
AYES: Blake, Hearn, Goins, Koss, Weeks
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0)
VI. Public Hearings:
Regular City Council Meeting 11-12-2024
Page | 5
1. Approval of Ordinance No. 17 -2024/first reading: Amending Chapter 2,
Administration, Article VIII, Firefighters’ Retirement Plan of the Code by amending:
Section 2-326, Cost of Living Increase; Section 2-331, Deferred Retirement Option
Plan; Providing for Codification; Providing for Severability of Provisions; Repealing
all Ordinances in Conflict Herewith and Providing an Effective Date. (24 -602).
(Administrative Services Director)
City Attorney Garganese announced that this is the First Reading and read the title
into the record as follows:
Ordinance 17-2024
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COCOA, BREVARD
COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ADMINISTRATION, ARTICLE
VIII, FIREFIGHTERS’ RETIREMENT PLAN, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES
OF THE CITY OF COCOA BY AMENDING SECTION 2 -326, COST OF LIVING
INCREASE; AMENDING SECTION 2-331, DEFERRED RETIREMENT OPTION
PLAN; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
OF PROVISIONS; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Ms. Gemmati provided an explanation of the item.
* MOTION by Mayor Blake; Seconded by Deputy Mayor Hearn to approve
Ordinance 17-2024 on First Reading.
Mayor Blake opened the Hearing to the public.
Paul Kamus, 116 Olive St., Cocoa, shared that an annual conference for new
trustees is being held tomorrow, November 13, 2024, in Daytona Beach for those
who want to learn more.
There being no further questions or comments, the public portion of the Hearing
was closed.
THE VOTE ON THE MOTION WAS:
AYES: Blake, Hearn, Goins, Koss, Weeks
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0)
2. Approval of Ordinance No. 16-2024/1st reading: related to Chapter 2,
Administration, Article VII Police Officers’ Retirement Plan; Amending Section 2 -
196, Benefit Amounts and Eligibility; Amending Section 2 -198, Disability;
Amending Section 2 -218, Deferred Retirement Option Plan; P roviding for
incorporation into the Code; Providing for severability of provisions; Repealing all
Regular City Council Meeting 11-12-2024
Page | 6
ordinances and resolutions in conflict herewith and providing an effective date. (24-
604). (Administrative Services Director)
City Attorney Garganese announced that this is the First Reading and read the title
into the record as follows:
Ordinance 16-2024
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COCOA, BREVARD
COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ADMINISTRATION, ARTICLE
VII, POLICE OFFICERS’ RETIREMENT PLAN, OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COCOA BY AMENDING SECTION 2 -196,
BENEFIT AMOUNTS AND ELIGIBILITY; AMENDING SECTION 2 -198,
DISABILITY; AMENDING SECTION 2-218, DEFERRED RETIREMENT OPTION
PLAN; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
OF PROVISIONS; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Ms. Gemmati provided an explanation of the item.
Mayor Blake opened the Hearing to the public.
Paul Kamus, 116 Olive St., Cocoa, wished to ask for clarification.
There being no further questions or comments, the public portion of the Hearing
was closed.
* MOTION by Mayor Blake ; Seconded by Deputy Mayor Hearn to approve
Ordinance 16-2024 on First Reading.
THE VOTE ON THE MOTION WAS:
AYES: Blake, Hearn, Goins, Koss, Weeks1
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0)
3. Consideration of a Resolution of the City of Cocoa, Florida, electing to not exempt
certain property from ad valorem taxation, as allowed under section
196.1978(3)(o), Florida Statutes, providing for conflicts, severability, and an
effective date. (24-616). (Planner)
City Manager Whitten provided an explanation of the item as well as staff’s
recommendation.
1 Councilmember Weeks left the meeting at 7:04pm & returned at 7:07pm
Regular City Council Meeting 11-12-2024
Page | 7
Mayor Blake opened the Hearing to the public.
There being no questions or comments, the public portion of the Hearing was
closed.
* MOTION by Mayor Blake; Seconded by Councilmember Koss to approve the
item.
THE VOTE ON THE MOTION WAS:
AYES: Blake, Hearn, Goins, Koss, Weeks
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0)
4. Council Consideration and Public Comment on the use of the FY2024 Edward
Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance (JAG) Grant Program - Local Solicitation in the
amount of $15,653 ex post facto, and authorize the Grants Writer to submit the
City’s application. (24-617). (Police Chief)
* MOTION by Mayor Blake; Seconded by Councilmember Goins to approve the
item.
Mayor Blake opened the Hearing to the public.
There being no questions or comments, the public portion of the Hearing was
closed.
THE VOTE ON THE MOTION WAS:
AYES: Blake, Hearn, Goins, Koss, Weeks
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0)
5. Consideration of a Zoning Text Amendment to Appendix A, Article XIII, Section 22
of the City of Cocoa Code, amending tree protection and preservation standards
and procedures related to waivers of these requirements. (24-639). (Planner)
City Attorney Garganese announced that this is the First Reading and read the title
into the record as follows:
Ordinance 18-2024
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COCOA,
BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF COCOA REGARDING TREE PROTECTION AND
PRESERVATION; AMENDING PROCEDURES RELATED TO WAIVERS OF
Regular City Council Meeting 11-12-2024
Page | 8
TREE PROTECTION AND PRESERVATION REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING
FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS, INCORPORATION INTO THE CODE, SEVERABILITY, AND
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Ms. Ribeiro provided a presentation2 and explained the item.
Councilmember Weeks asked for clarification regarding the credits and what they
equal to in dollars. In response, City Manager Whitten provided clarification on the
change being proposed and Ms. Ribeiro explained how the credits work and the
dollar amount variations.
* MOTION by Mayor Blake; Seconded by Councilmember Goins to approve the
item on First Reading.
Mayor Blake opened the Hearing to the public.
There being no questions or comments, the public portion of the Hearing was
closed.
THE VOTE ON THE MOTION WAS:
AYES: Blake, Hearn, Goins, Koss, Weeks
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0)
6. Consideration of a Zoning Text Amendment Appendix A, Article V of the code of
the City of Cocoa to define Transportation Terminals, a permitted use applicable
to properties located in M-1 zoning district and as a special exception use in C -G
General Commercial district and commercia mixed use PUDs. (24-640). (Planner)
City Attorney Garganese announced that this is the First Reading and read the title
into the record as follows:
Ordinance 19-2024
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COCOA,
BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA; AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF COCOA TO DEFINE TRANSPORTATION TERMINALS;
PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES
AND RESOLUTIONS, INCORPORATION INTO THE CODE, SEVERABILITY,
AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
2 Exhibit A: Ordinance 18-2024 Presentation
Regular City Council Meeting 11-12-2024
Page | 9
Ms. Ribeiro provided a presentation3 and explained the item.
Mayor Blake opened the Hearing to the public.
There being no questions or comments, the public portion of the Hearing was
closed.
* MOTION by Councilmember Weeks; Seconded by Mayor Blake to approve
the item on First Reading.
THE VOTE ON THE MOTION WAS:
AYES: Blake, Hearn, Goins, Koss, Weeks
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0)
7. Consideration on this First Reading of an Expedited State Review Comprehensive
Plan Text Amendment to City of Cocoa Future Land Use Element Policy 1.1.2.6(F),
relating to the Mixed-Use future land use category, to provide additional flexibility
for allowable uses on the ground floor of vertical mixed -use buildings eligible for
density bonuses under the Comprehensive Plan. (24-654). (Planner)
City Attorney Garganese announced that this is the First Reading and read the title
into the record as follows:
Ordinance 14-2024
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COCOA,
BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTING A LARGE SCALE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT; AMENDING A POLICY IN THE
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT RELATED TO THE MIXED -USE FUTURE
LAND USE CATEGORY, ESTABLISHING THE A UTHORIZED USES
PERMITTED ON THE GROUND FLOOR OF A MIXED USE BUILDING, SUCH
MIXED-USE BUILDINGS BEING ELIGIBLE FOR RESIDENTIAL DENSITY
BONUSES GENERALLY OF AN ADDITIONAL FIVE (5) DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE FOR VERTICAL MIXED -USE BUILDINGS AND UP TO 125 DWELLIN G
UNITS PER ACRE FOR VERTICAL MIXED -USE PROJECTS IN THE VERY
LIMITED GEOGRAPHICAL AREA IDENTIFIED IN POLICY 1.1.2.6 OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND REQUIRING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BY THE CITY COUNCIL UNDER CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS
DEEMED NECESSARY AND ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY COUNCIL; FOR
THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS,
3 Exhibit B: Ordinance 19-2024 Presentation
Regular City Council Meeting 11-12-2024
Page | 10
INCORPORATION INTO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, SEVERABILITY, AND
AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND LEGAL STATUS OF THE PLAN AMENDMENT.
Patrick Murray, RVi Consultants, gave a presentation4 and explained the item.
Councilmember Koss shared her concerns and spoke about the Bank of America
building in Cocoa Village. Additionally, she discussed the importance of
maintaining the character of the Village as well as maintaining its vitality5.
Mayor Blake opened the Hearing to the public6.
Linda Dolphin, 2100 N. Indian River Dr., Cocoa, provided a suggestion to Council
for consideration.
There being no further questions or comments, the public portion of the Hearing
was closed.
* MOTION by Mayor Blake; Seconded by Deputy Mayor Hearn to approve the
item on First Reading.
THE VOTE ON THE MOTION WAS:
AYES: Blake, Hearn, Goins, Koss, Weeks
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0)
VII. Council Business: Moved Before Public Hearings
1. Consider the reappointment of Ron Chabot through November 2027; Consider the
appointment of Katherine Stewart and Joseph Bachand to fill one Regular member
vacancy and one Alternate member vacancy on the Planning and Zoning Board.
(24-587). (Administrative Services Director) Tabled
1. To Provide Direction to Staff for the installation of speed humps in Diamond Square
on Stone Street and Blake Avenue under an exemption to the City’s speed hump
policy as approved on July 12, 2022. (24-656). (Councilman Goins)
Councilmember Goins talked about the need for speed humps on Stone Street
and Blake Avenue due to the speeders.
4 Exhibit C: Mixed Use Future Land Use Category – Comp Plan Amendment
5 Deputy Mayor Hearn left the meeting at 7:57pm & returned at 7:59pm
6 Councilmember Goins left the meeting at 7:59pm & returned at 8:01pm
Regular City Council Meeting 11-12-2024
Page | 11
Ms. Wilkes, on behalf of Principal Cole, also spoke about the speeders in the area
and the concerns for the children who attend Emma Jewel Charter Academy.
* MOTION by Councilmember Goins; Seconded by Mayor Blake to install
speed humps on Blake Avenue and Stone Street, for discussion.
Councilmember Weeks shared her concerns about installing speed humps and
emergency vehicle response times being delayed. She explained that while she
does feel that security measures need to be taken in that area, speed humps may
not necessarily be the answer.
Councilmember Koss also talked about looking at other options first such as a
flashing light.
* MOTION AMENDED by Councilmember Goins; Seconded by Mayor Blake to
install speed humps on Blake Aven ue only and to look at other traffic
calming options for Stone Street.
THE VOTE ON THE MOTION WAS:
AYES: Blake, Hearn, Goins, Koss, Weeks
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0)
2. Approval of the requested road closure changes for the 2024 Space Coast
Marathon and Half due to the ongoing construction in Lee Wenner Park. (24-607).
(Comm. & Economic Dev. Director)
* MOTION by Mayor Blake; Seconded by Councilmember Weeks to approve
the road closure changes.
THE VOTE ON THE MOTION WAS:
AYES: Blake, Hearn, Goins, Koss, Weeks
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0)
3. Approve the grant application of $49,000,000 for the FY24 Federal -State
Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail Grant Program offered by the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) for the construction of a Cocoa Multi-Modal Station.
Authorize the City Manager to sign any documents related to the grant application.
(24-633). (Comm. & Economic Development Director)
Ms. Senger shared that this item is for the internal grant application form. Staff will
repurpose the grant application submitted for the CRISI grant with information
Regular City Council Meeting 11-12-2024
Page | 12
provided from a follow -up meeting regarding that grant application.
Earlier this year, Cocoa City Council earmarked $5,000,000 ($2.5M FY24 & $2.5M
FY25) in economic incentives to support the project which can be used towards
the matching component of the grant. The recent commitment of $5,000,000 in
tourism development tax money approved by the Brevard County Board of County
Commissioners at their May 7, 2024, meeting will also be put towards the match
component.
If awarded this grant, staff will prepare an agenda item to accept the grant and a
BAF to provide budget for the grant-funded project.
* MOTION by Councilmember Koss ; Seconded by Deputy Mayor Hearn to
approve the item.
THE VOTE ON THE MOTION WAS:
AYES: Blake, Hearn, Goins, Koss, Weeks
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0)
4. Approve a Resolution Amending the FY2025 Budget, BAF #25 -008-A, for
purchase of a Monarch fire pumper truck from Sutphen Corporation for
$1,119,995. (24-637). (Finance Director)
* MOTION by Mayor Blake; Seconded by Councilmember Weeks to approve
the item.
THE VOTE ON THE MOTION WAS:
AYES: Blake, Hearn, Goins, Koss, Weeks
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0)
5. Approve the requested 2025 street closures associated with the proposed Special
Events. (24-646). (Comm. & Economic Development Director)
Ms. Senger pointed out that Council may notice that the Mardi Gras parade is not
on the schedule for next year. Staff has received complaints over the last several
years from businesses in the Village who have to shut down for the evening. Staff
has worked closely with the event organizer to try to come up with other ways to
celebrate Mardi Gras, and the organizer has been very supportive to try to
accommodate everyone.
Regular City Council Meeting 11-12-2024
Page | 13
* MOTION by Councilmember Koss; Seconded by Councilmember Weeks to
approve the item.
THE VOTE ON THE MOTION WAS:
AYES: Blake, Hearn, Goins, Weeks
NAYES: Koss
THE MOTION CARRIED (4-1)
6. To Provide Direction to Staff for the installation of speed humps in Diamond Square
on Stone Street and Blake Avenue under an exemption to the City’s speed hump
policy as approved on July 12, 2022. (24-656). (Councilman Goins) Moved to VII.1
VIII. City Business:
1. To Provide Direction to Staff for Funding and New Policies, if Necessary, for the
Indian River Drive Septic to Sewer Conversion. (24-599). (Councilwoman Weeks)
Councilmember Koss wished to point out an error in the staff report. Additionally,
she recused herself from voting due to a conflict of interest7.
Councilmember Weeks talked about the project and shared that she would like to
advocate for the proposed Option 2, which requires mandatory participation. It
requires all homeowners to connect to the sewer system once completed. Council
would need to determine how cost overruns are funded . If cost overruns , and
public infrastructure are greater than SOIRL funding and any applicable grants, the
cost above the available funding will be paid for by Utilities/Utility Rate Payers.
City Manager Whitten provided clarification and stated that it is the cost of the
project that is unknown.
Deputy Mayor Hearn asked if any differentials could be charged as a Special
Assessment to only the 88 homeowners that this would affect. In response, City
Attorney Garganese explained the legalities and requirements of a Special
Assessment.
Mayor Blake opened the discussion to the public.
Frank Sullivan, 1705 N. Indian River Dr., C ocoa, spoke about saving the Indian
River Lagoon. He explained that it is not about increasing the value of homes, but
7 Exhibit D: Voting Conflict Form 8B
Regular City Council Meeting 11-12-2024
Page | 14
how to save the lagoon 8 and hopes that Council can make a decision tonight so
the city can move forward.
Al Vasquez, 665 Seville Ct., Sate llite Beach, shared that he is here to speak pro
bono on behalf of the residents of Brevard County and the citizens of Cocoa. He
talked about toxicity and nutrient pollution. He shared that this needs to be done in
order to comply with the law and encouraged Council to get the project done
because it needs to get done.
Aleck Greenwood, 640 Brevard Avenue, Cocoa, wished to point out that this is not
a question of whether or not the City wants the project. This has been delayed
because it is cost prohibitive. He asked if it is possible to find another method that
is more cost effective and less intrusive.
Linda Dolphin, 2100 N. Indian River Dr., Cocoa, asked Council to consider
approving Councilmember Weeks’ motion, that way this project can go out to bid.
If the bids come in way too high, Council can decide at that time to not move
forward with it.
Mr. Walsh explained that he does not feel that the focus should be so much on
trying to add up the numbers, but rather ask the question if Council feels
comfortable to make the utility payers responsible for any overruns. This is a large
project and an equally large risk that has been strongly researched. He reiterated
that there are a lot of unknowns with this project.
James Smith, 2107 Clairemont Dr., Cocoa, shared he has lived here for forty-four
years. He spoke about when reuse water hookups were done many years ago in
his neighborhood. Those costs were prorated, and he wondered if that could be
done with this project. Additionally, he’d rather be on sewer than advanced septic.
Councilmember Weeks shared the example of the Knollwood community and
knows that this kind of project has been done before.
Further discussion was held on funding.
Deputy Mayor Hearn asked Council if they would be willing to send a
representative to attend a SOIRL meeting to ask if they would be willing to make
an amendment to their policy to fund any project overruns one hundred percent.
8 Mayor Blake left the meeting at 8:19pm & returned at 8:24pm
Regular City Council Meeting 11-12-2024
Page | 15
Additionally, he’d like to ask if the mandate can be applied only to these eighty-
eight homes and have enforcement measurements be brought back before
Council.
He is supportive of this project but would like to table this item so these things can
be addressed first.
* MOTION by Councilmember Weeks ; Seconded by Deputy Mayor Hearn to
table this item in order to obtain further information.
THE VOTE ON THE MOTION WAS:
AYES: Blake, Hearn, Goins, Weeks
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (4-0)
IX. Informational Agenda:
1. Approved change orders to construction contracts that the City Council has
authorized the City Manager, by resolution, to approve in excess of the City
Manager’s spending authority. (24-612). (Finance Director)
2. Data showing the relation between the estimated and actual income and expenses
to date. (24-613). (Finance Director)
3. FY 2024 August Budget Adjustment Report. (24-614). (Finance Director)
4. Any approved change orders to construction contracts that the City Council has
authorized the City Manager, by resolution, to approve in excess of the City
Manager’s spending authority. (24-641). (Finance Director)
5. Data showing the relation between the estimated and actual income and expenses
to date. (24-642). (Finance Director)
6. FY 2025 October Budget Adjustment Report. (24-643). (Finance Director)
7. Bi-weekly Report from September 23 - October 4, 2024. (24-651). (City Manager)
8. Informational Only – The City of Cocoa's Open Board Vacancies. (24 -652). (City
Clerk)
X. Reports:
Regular City Council Meeting 11-12-2024
Page | 16
City Manager Whitten shared that at the last Diamond Square CRA Conference,
the City was given an award for the affordable housing project for the Michael C.
Blake Subdivision.
Additionally, the annual food drive competition between Cocoa and Rockledge is
going on now through December 6 th. Additionally, there will be a collection event
at the Cocoa Walmart on Monday, November 25th from 10am-3pm.
Councilmember Weeks provided a brief report on her district.
Councilmember Goins shared several photos from events he recently attended,
including the recent Diamond Square CRA conference. He stated that he will be
hosting an event called Talk 2 Me Tuesday on November 19, 2024 at 6:30pm at
the Family Promise building located at 114 First Street in Cocoa.
Deputy Mayor Hearn shared that he would like to coordinate an event with the City
Council to take a tour of the entire city in order to get a fair assessment of what
needs to be addressed before the budget season starts.
Councilmember Koss provided a report on District 4. She talked about her Town
Hall meeting and its successful turnout. She gave tentative save the dates for
March 18, 2025 and October 21, 2025 for future District 4 Town Hall meetings.
She also spoke about the Brevard Museum as well as the Florida League of Cities
conference that her and Mayor Blake attended recently.
Councilmember Koss stated that she would also like to see the Utilities Advisory
Board be revitalized. She would like the vacancies to be advertised to try and
recruit members so the Board can begin meeting again.
City Manager Whitten noted that he will provide a report at an upcoming meeting.
Mayor Blake provided two photos from the Diamond Square CRA conference he
recently attended with Council.
He mentioned House Bill 619 and talked about homeowners’ insurance increases.
He thanked City Manager Whitten and Abigail Morgan for working on the
improvements that were done at the Leon and Jewel Collins Museum.
XI. Adjournment:
* MOTION by Councilmember Goins ; Seconded by Deputy Mayor Hearn to
adjourn the Regular meeting of November 12, 2024.
AYES: Blake, Hearn, Goins, Koss, Weeks
Regular City Council Meeting 11-12-2024
Page | 17
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0)
The meeting adjourned at 9:17 p.m.
________________________________
Michael C. Blake, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Monica Arsenault, City Clerk
Agenda (the City's wording)
The City's agenda for this meeting is on file (CC_Reg_Packet_11_12_2024), but its item list has not been read reliably by machine yet, so no outline is shown.
Transcript Partial transcript
Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have
not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard.
It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's
minutes do that (above).
A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. “▶ Play” opens the recording at that moment, on YouTube, in a new tab.
687 suspect passage(s) marked in place; inspection incomplete: language review; 5 stretch(es) where a voice was detected and no words were recognized.
How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 26 voices separated from the audio.
63 short machine repair(s) (71 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one.
Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs and whether a voice was detected where the words are. Not completed: language review.
A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 92.7% of 27,306 content words.
Dotted words (809 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading.
687 passages (23% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there.
Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Inspection is incomplete: language review.
Voice detected, no words recognized (5 stretches). Something may have been said here that the transcript does not have:
00:44:25 (7 s) — neither reading has words
01:32:30 (6 s) — neither reading has words
02:02:27 (9 s) — neither reading has words
02:02:48 (11 s) — neither reading has words
02:53:23 (7 s) — neither reading has words
Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.
Invocation will be performed by Deputy Mayor Hearn. Pledge of Allegiance will be performed by Councilwoman Weeks. Would everyone please secure your cell phone pages, etc., etc.
So if everyone is joining me in a prayer, you have any father, I'd like to give thanks to you for allowing us to arrive here safely tonight. I'd like to give thanks for continuing watching over this city, all the citizens, our families that's here and abroad. I know that we're day late, but I want to give thanks also to veterans around the world. Continue to watch over those guys, women and guys, and their families. Watch over the city and make sure that we make only the best decisions on behalf of the
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:01:26–00:01:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:42–00:01:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:03–00:02:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:07–00:02:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:18–00:02:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:44–00:02:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:57–00:03:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It's pertaining to the PNZ board members. One of the members accidentally was left off. So to be fair and equitable across the board, that's item number 7-1. I'm asking that that item be tabled, please.
Okay. ‸ Thanks, ma'am. His name was accidentally left off. Oh. During the preparation. And I wanted to be fair and equitable across the board. So I'm asking that we table it to the next council meeting. And we'll just proceed from there.
I'm talking about the same person you're talking about that sits on the end right down the street, right down the corner of Dixon Boulevard and Indian River Drive Road?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:15–00:05:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the machine readings disagree here · 00:05:58–00:05:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:00–00:06:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:11–00:06:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:12–00:06:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:26–00:06:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:40–00:06:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
city, cocoa village celebration of everything cocoa and holiday. We start off sip and stroll it's the Saturday after Thanksgiving ‸ we roll on through December so this is our annual presentation about hot cocoa holidays
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:24–00:07:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:32–00:07:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:07:45–00:08:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
A holiday bazaar. Amazing arts and crafts. Gifts that are original and memories that ‸ last. Arts and crafts. Arts and crafts. This is how we play. Come and see our village in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:08:22–00:08:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
most delightful way. The chocolate's nice and hot. there's lots of stuff to find a hunt through cocoa village stores is great at Christmas time Fill your tin,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:38–00:08:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:09:12–00:09:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
director. um As most of you know, Amanda has moved across the country and so we welcome Christopher Stagman uh this month to uh lead us and bring us into the next chapter of the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:58–00:10:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:25–00:10:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:38–00:10:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:10:52–00:10:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:56–00:10:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:58–00:10:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:59–00:11:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:12–00:11:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:14]▶ PlaySpeaker 14 (introduced as “Stuart Buchanan” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:11:17–00:11:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:19–00:11:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:25]▶ PlaySpeaker 14 (introduced as “Stuart Buchanan” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
the last time I spoke in front of the city council you were in the old city hall. I was previously your city planner in fact Mr. Garganese and I actually started the same year when he first graduated from law school. I'm here tonight to ask the mayor and city council's assistance
[00:11:44]▶ PlaySpeaker 14 (introduced as “Stuart Buchanan” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:55–00:11:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:59]▶ PlaySpeaker 14 (introduced as “Stuart Buchanan” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
and it still has not been placed on the advisory board, on the code enforcement advisory board. We already have a buyer, a family ‸ wants to make cocoa their home. We are going to lose this. and I have to tell you mayor and city council, if you look through all the documentation I've provided your ‸ new code enforcement supervisor is very non-responsive I will also point out to you that you are one of the only cities that does not have what's called a public access porthole. So the regular residents can simply go online and see where their case is and see the history of their case. I would encourage you to look at
[00:12:40]▶ PlaySpeaker 14 (introduced as “Stuart Buchanan” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:40–00:12:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:42]▶ PlaySpeaker 14 (introduced as “Stuart Buchanan” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
You can track everything. It eliminates all these issues. But we are here tonight to ask you, mayor and city council, to give clear direction to staff for the upcoming code enforcement board which is next Thursday the You can understand from the city clerk, they don't release the agenda ‸ until three days prior, so it hasn't been released yet. and everything else I've written down there for you
[00:13:07]▶ PlaySpeaker 14 (introduced as “Stuart Buchanan” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:07–00:13:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:10]▶ PlaySpeaker 14 (introduced as “Stuart Buchanan” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
And whatever that lien reduction hearing is, will satisfy the remainder. and then we can move a new
[00:13:16]▶ PlaySpeaker 14 (introduced as “Stuart Buchanan” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:16–00:13:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:18]▶ PlaySpeaker 14 (introduced as “Stuart Buchanan” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Thank you, mayor and city council, for allowing me to speak. I'll be happy to answer any questions that you have
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:23–00:13:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:27]▶ PlaySpeaker 14 (introduced as “Stuart Buchanan” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:37–00:13:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
cool beans alright ‸ I'm here to talk about like three instances that I've had with the Cocoa Police Department one is that on the corner of Princeton and Pineda two blocks away from Cambridge Elementary
and I invite all of you stop by there park your car there Not only look at how many children play there, but how many people, they will gasp with the children standing there. and you call and you call and you call I've never seen any of them there It's happening every single day. I invite all of you to go there And that leads me to my second thing, which is, um I'm here to address an incident involving a police officer that has raised serious concern about unprofessional conduct on
my wife and I experienced a distressing situation with our cat that was killed in our own home by an unleashed dog. When we sought help, the responding officer made an alarming commenting, stating that it is natural for
This lack of sympathy was shocking and deeply hurtful. Additionally, when my wife tried to document the dangerous dog being returned to its irresponsible owners, the officer obstructed her access out of the driveway, seemingly preventing her from recording the incident. This raises serious concerns about accountability and respect for victims. We felt treated, we felt like we were treated as perpetrators rather than victims, while the actual aggressors received sympathy. I urge the council to investigate this behavior and ensure that future interactions ‸ prioritize the dignity and rights of victims and my third one was that I had a guy follow me home and you know I stopped in front of Cambridge Elementary because I didn't want him to see where I was living I guess it was road rage I didn't even know why he was following me and he bumps my car so I'm like dude I get out and I go to take pictures I take pictures of him I take pictures of his um of his uh tag as he's trying to hit me with his car
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:54–00:15:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:15:58–00:16:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
body cam footage I can prove all of this like you know he was my 15 year old cat a dog ran in my house my house and killed my cat and I ‸ just don't even know what to say anymore and thank you for your time I'm nervous
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:49–00:16:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:07–00:17:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:15–00:17:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
have a three digit number in the event there is a water main leak. um My thought is what we know water as H2O, hydrogen, two parts hydrogen, one oxygen. So if you go on your phone and you look up the letter or the number
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:56–00:17:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:59–00:17:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:02–00:18:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um About a month ago, I was coming from Merritt Island on 520, and as I was approaching the village, and I got to around just the east side of the old sun trust I noticed some water on the south side along the curb, and it was standing water, and there was no rain. But as I went further west, then I saw flowing water right there at Brevard and Willard. So I
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:33–00:18:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:41–00:18:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:51–00:18:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
dispatcher about the leak, and I did a public records request with city clerk's office. Come to find out, I was the only one who called it in. I'm not sure how long the leak was going, or how long before the supervisor got there, and when he got there, I'm not sure how long it took for a crew to get out there to, you know, slow it down, or whatever it ‸ is they do. But
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:28–00:19:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
kind of feel, though, folks who went by and didn't call, maybe they didn't know how to go about reporting it. So I'm coming to you all, and you all may know if something already exists, or maybe this
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:44–00:19:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:50–00:19:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:52–00:19:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
area until later, but this could be something that could be a national phone number. um And just one other thing due to uh Veterans Day yesterday, I took the word home and I made it into an acronym. And to me, it's Honor Our Military Every Day. So it's just something I wanted to share with you. And
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:20:28–00:20:29 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
or what, but it ‸ just, every time I go by that intersection, I just think of what I saw that evening. And it was like, you know, here we went all those years with the road being rough. And then it was finally nice and smooth. And now we got a water main.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:55–00:20:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:56–00:20:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:12–00:21:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:39–00:21:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:41–00:21:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:21:45–00:21:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
yeah Yes. Thank you. Yes. I got my paper right in front of me. So we've asked that this particular item, which is number six, um our number seven dash six, pretending to provide directions for staff for an installation of speed humps
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:22:21–00:22:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:33–00:22:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:40–00:22:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:22:59–00:23:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:39–00:23:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
church school, ‸ think two churches, one school. A lot of kids walk in this area. And so Blake Avenue, Stone Street has become more of a cut through to get to either to hurry up and get to 520 or to
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:58–00:24:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:11–00:24:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:24:22–00:24:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
so many speeders that come down the road ‸ down Blake Avenue. So he put things in the middle to try to force people to slow down. And so I'm asking council to, to waive our current policy that we have, which is a long, drawn out process. We did something similar on Michigan Avenue. Unfortunately, a man was killed while he was cutting grass. And my, my goal in this is let's not react until when someone gets killed. Um, let, let's try to react, be proactive in our processes. I'm not saying the process that we have is bad or either to change it. Um, I'm asking for the council to, um, waive the process based on, on safety and based on our current, um, facilities that we have in that area.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:23–00:25:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:33–00:25:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:39–00:25:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:41–00:25:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:48–00:25:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Let's talk about safety. I'm usually the first one to get on campus in the morning and ‸ last one to leave. So I see the traffic flow. Uh, unfortunately we have members in our community that either they don't care or they're not aware. Uh, we have scholars that come in early in the morning. We don't have crossing guards that early in the morning. We have scholars that stay after hours and we don't have crossing guards after hours. It is imperative. It is imperative that we slow the traffic down on Lake Avenue and surrounding streets leading to our academy. I would say this is better for us to put up signs saying speed bump ahead speed hump ahead, speed table ahead, then signs that says in memory of thank you for your time.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:51–00:26:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:58–00:26:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
crossing guards, excuse me. I'm in favor of providing that venue for them in reference of a speed hump or table, anything to slow the speed down. Because like on Sunday when I was a kid growing up, zooming down the street, loud music on Sunday was a slap in the face. You get your butt toe
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:28:03–00:28:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
elders and what the church still stands for today. But my thing is, yes, I'm all about that safety first and foremost. ‸ I know we're talking about response time. My greatest concern is just trying to collaborate with public works that would, you
address the best way to meet the safety needs of the school and the churches. Not only just on Blake, but also on Stone because there are a couple of churches on Stone Street too as well as we know. So I'm about that and I do support that.
So ‸ this video, this video don't work probably the next one probably won't work as well. But regardless, I will have them send it to you guys emails so you can at
hear what the students have to say. So this video were is coming from the SGA. We always try to get them involved in government processes. And so these are ‸ all the members from the SGA just pretty much saying the same thing about what they see walking to school, ‸ how they feel about being proactive as well. So that's what really the video was about. And so I know you have a light as well, but I would like to make a motion to to waive the process. I will get with along with the city manager to discuss maybe where they
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:39–00:29:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:42–00:29:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:07–00:30:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:16–00:30:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:30:26–00:30:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:33–00:30:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:43–00:30:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:57–00:31:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:22–00:31:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:35–00:31:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I wonder and, um, my concern with speed humps is the response time for police and fire. I know I talked with them before and asked because people in my own neighborhood were requesting that we get speed humps and it definitely does slow down response time. And I wonder if there's any other options to slow traffic in that area.
anything other than speed humps since you don't want somebody, uh, to die because the police couldn't or the fire could not get, especially the fire could not get there in time because of the speed humps. That's my concern.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:27–00:32:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:24–00:33:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:44–00:33:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
speed hump, especially, uh, in that area with everything. I mean, I just, I have a problem with them. So I, ‸ I would say at this point, I'm not in favor of it. Not that I don't think we need some safety there. We definitely do, but there's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:34:09–00:34:09 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:21–00:34:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:34:41–00:34:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:39–00:35:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Or humps. Right. Um, you know, one of the issues was that they're not exactly associated with better neighborhoods. So there is an image issue. Secondly, there seemed to be other alternatives that were, uh, traffic quieting that were had less impact on our emergency vehicles. And we're actually less expensive. So, um, ‸ there were more stop signs put in. One of them has flashing.
But looking at every alternative before going to speed humps. I wish we could say that there's at least in district four, there is not one neighborhood in district four, rich or poor, where I don't get the main complaint I get is people speeding down the street. There is just a culture of speeding. Yeah,
And, um, you know, we have a, we have a community. We have a, a state really that has grown up, um, serving the vehicle, the vehicle serving us and we're serving the vehicle. Everyone is, is everything is built for the vehicle, but creating those bike lanes, uh, putting in additional stop signs. I know in neighborhoods I've lived in previously outside of this state, the stop signs were very helpful.
mean, a stop sign at every corner in an urban area is pretty standard. And, um, you still have speeders every once in a while, but it's a ‸ little bit harder to do it.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:47–00:37:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the stop signs we do have on Stone Street, they're blowing through them. And so, you know, maybe that's a traffic enforcement conversation as well. Um, but, and I'm pretty sure that's not the only neighborhood that has these issues. Um, but, but, but I think
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:07–00:38:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Everybody is just trying to go around to cut their time. It's not like a, just a normal neighborhood. Like they're actually truly using this as a detour constantly over and over.
after a tragedy happens. That's my only, um, so whatever that conversation, however that, if it's a table, if it's a cushion, if it's a, uh, whatever that may be. Um, we, we, we have to do something because ‸ image ‸ right
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:20–00:39:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:51–00:39:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:13–00:40:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:22–00:40:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:40:36–00:40:36 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:40:39–00:40:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:42–00:40:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:45–00:40:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
On the stop signs. So, so I can remove that conversation about, uh, speed tables or whatever that is on Stone, but Stone Street still needs some of those traffic calming, um, devices.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:08–00:41:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:41:11–00:41:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:41:25–00:41:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
have speed humps where there shouldn't be. So that's, that's more frustrating driving an emergency vehicle. But as far as Blake, I can witness, I witnessed a vehicle. I think maybe this was earlier this year that flipped over
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:38–00:41:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:56–00:41:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:35–00:42:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:42:40–00:42:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. Thank you very much. We have direction now. Mrs. um Wilkes, ma'am, please take this valuable information back to the proper authorities, Principal Cole and staff. We sincerely appreciate what you all do with the children of the community and the advancement of their education. It's indicative of the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:25–00:43:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
what we are. Okay. Proceeding on to the next item, 6-1 consideration for approval ordinance 13-20. well Am I reading that right yes land development code text amendment appendix a article 11 section
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:47–00:43:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words the first reading may have missed · 00:44:20–00:44:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:24–00:44:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:43–00:44:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, sir. This is just a change to the road closure that you all approved last year for the Space Coast Marathon due to the closure of Lee Winter Park, which they typically utilize as part of the route. So they've just rerouted and those changes are included in the agenda item. And I'm here if you have any questions. We
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:10–00:45:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:16–00:45:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:21–00:45:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:24–00:45:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:36–00:45:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:46–00:45:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:58–00:46:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:03–00:46:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:26–00:46:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Passenger Rail Grant Program. um As you may have heard, uh we were not selected to receive Chrissy funding for the station, but we are still determined to uh move forward. Brightline is still committed to ‸ having the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:43–00:46:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and so we are going to continue to find new ways to uh secure funding. So this is a grant that became available, and we are going to uh repackage our Chrissy grant application.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:11–00:47:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:12–00:47:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:14–00:47:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:15–00:47:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:21–00:47:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:23–00:47:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
from the Space Coast Office of Tourism. uh That is still in that is in the approved DOT work plan. um That is the TPO portion of the funding. uh So that is still moving forward and and secured. So now, um again, we will be reworking our application and submitting that for this new grant uh that is due mid-December. And I'm available if you have any questions. No,
ma'am. I'm happy to say I've had a dialogue at the time as he was making preparations just like myself. Representative ‸ Mike Herodopoulos, I strongly feel he's on board with this as well. But now that he's the House of Representatives, I do we like to get confirmation. But D,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:24–00:48:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:33–00:48:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:37–00:48:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh Yes, I i just want to put this out to the public. um Often when these decisions are made, uh ‸ majority of the public aren't here to hear the ins and the outs. um I just want to put the uh to bed any rumors of uh the application being denied due to possible incompetence of staff. That's not true. uh That uh now the taxes are going to be raised even more due to the application being
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:14–00:49:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh denied. None of that is true. um As the mayor alluded to, I'm even more optimistic that we're going to get this money uh and get this station built. um All parties, as stated by
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:24–00:49:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
table to assist in this. uh uh Brightline, f dot um Federal, State, everybody's coming to the table on this project. So uh I'm still optimistic on this as well. And uh some of the things that's being put out there is just simply far-fetched. So uh you have my approval on this. So is that emotion uh I made a motion. I'll second. uh Councilwoman
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:51–00:49:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:56–00:49:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:12–00:50:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:42–00:50:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
ma'am ‸ council did previously approve an agenda item for the purchase of the fire truck, um allowing the city manager to pull the purchase order for it. However, that was dependent upon us getting uh some debt ‸ financing in place. I am working with a financial advisor on uh reviewing bids and terms to um get that figured out and be brought to you in December.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:18–00:51:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So I am requesting approval to put a budget amendment in place. And then when we get the debt financing in place and I bring the agenda item to you, we'll bring you a budget
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:38–00:51:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that we know of for the year. um So this is our annual request for street closure approval. I just wanted to make one note. Most of these are annual events that happen year after year. So you may be familiar with them. I do want to just make one note that
We are not. We are planning this year to not have a Mardi Gras parade. They are still doing the concert in the park, but will not be shutting down the streets of the village with fences and
because that you may hear about that. So I wanted to make sure you knew it. um We've we received for many years complaints from businesses being shut down for for the evening during the event. And so we are going to and have asked uh the organizer of the event um has worked with us and tried to find other options as well to see how we could work together. And he's very supportive. So I just wanted to make note of that. And
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:53:45–00:53:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:56–00:54:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
can either continue on and just end up with public hearings, or would you like to just move forward to city business? What are the wishes of council? What would you like to do, council?
to staff for funding new policies, if necessary, for Indian River Drive, septic to sewer conversion. Councilwoman Weeks, that's the reason why I'm asking. I understand. Yes, ma'am. So we will go in that direction. The ‸ floor is yours, ma'am.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:35–00:54:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that in the agenda? Because with the agenda, we are going to go to public hearings and then do the... ‸ just asking because people that may have planned to come for something that was going to be the last item may not be here at this time. I
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:55:01–00:55:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:15–00:55:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:27–00:55:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:40–00:55:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:48–00:55:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
By amending section 2-326, cost of living increase, amending section ‸ 2-331, deferred retirement option plan, providing for codification, providing for severability of provisions, repealing all ordinances in conflict here with and providing an effective date. This is first reading, public hearing item. Thank you very much,
‸ Okay. All right. Thank you, sir. Okay. um So this came up um during union negotiations this year. ‸ We finalized our three-year contract. And as a result of that, we negotiated pension changes. And it's been a common practice in retirement plans to increase the term of the drop, which is a deferred retirement option. And right now
And what a drop is, is where you're still actively working, but your pension payment is going into an account. And so it's um a common, like the Florida retirement system just adopted this. And so this came up in union negotiations that um it'd be popular to do. There's no impact to the city to do this. So um we negotiated those changes. We wrote the ordinance with the pension attorney and our pension attorney and the fire pension attorney. And then that was one of the changes. And another one was the cost of living increase. This really isn't a change in benefit. the This is really just fixing a language that if there was a decrease in the CPI, that we wouldn't take benefits away from a retiree. So their pension benefit would just remain the same. So.
if he wants to do the drop for eight years. So that was to give them the option for current or future um firefighters to go to eight years in the drop.
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:08–00:58:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:20–00:58:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I know I'm gonna ‸ make the motion, but I hear from the public. I'm looking for a second to approve this particular item here. Second. Okay. We have a second on the floor by Deputy Mayor Hearns. Okay. Any other questions for Mrs.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:57–00:59:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Just to let you all know in the public know, tomorrow the Division of Management Services, which is the retirement system for Florida for local law plans, which is the fire and police, they're having their annual conference in Daytona. And tomorrow's session is for new trustees or council members who want to get an understanding of a local law plan, defined benefit plan. So it starts at 8 30 tomorrow. And I just wanted to share that with you.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:01–01:00:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:07–01:00:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
favor ‸ saying aye. Aye. in the nays. Ayes have it unanimously. Proceeding on to the next item. Approval ‸ of ordinance number 16-2024. First reading related to Chapter 2 Administration Article 7 Police Officers Retirement Plan. Amending Section 2. 196 Benefit Amounts and Eligibility. Amending Section 2-198 Disability. Amending Section 2-218. Deferred Retirement Option Plan. Providing for incorporation into the code.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:00:56–01:00:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:06–01:01:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:13–01:01:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
By amending Section 2-196. Benefit Amounts and Eligibility. Amending Section 2-198 Disability. Amending Section 2-218. Deferred Retirement Option Plan. Providing for codification. Providing for severability ‸ provisions. Repealing all ordinances in conflict here with and Providing an effective date. And this is public hearing item. there Thank ‸ you very much.
Okay,‸ And this item is almost identical. The only thing different about this one, the police, was we added an additional disability pension benefit in the event if there's an active shooter scenario.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:02:03–01:02:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:11–01:02:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay, seeing we have no questions for her, we'd like to close this portion to Council, ‸ to the public. Please come forward and state your name and elaborate on this particular item. Going once.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:04–01:03:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
okay cool I just uh finished my term on the police pension board uh end of September so that was something that I was curious about so thank you very much
of the great things we're doing in the great city of Coco sir we stand ‸ with uh employees Any other ones? From the public, please come forward and say your name. Seeing none,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:38–01:03:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:41–01:03:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:03:51–01:03:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I said unanimously ‸ okay the next item and I'm just trying to make sure my because my paper has something a little different but we a-okay consideration of a
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:08–01:04:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:13–01:04:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:25–01:04:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:26–01:04:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um this past legislative session the live local act was amended to allow certain properties, basically properties that are affordable housing properties to be exempt from, uh
taxation or property taxation. um and so, as you know, um uh ‸ we've, uh concentrated on building the city's tax base. And so, this recommendation is for the city council to, to elect to not exempt those properties from, uh
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:25–01:05:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of affordable housinghousing in the metropolitan statistical area and so we're recommending that you that you uh approve the staff recommendation to approve the resolution electing to not exempt certain properties from
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:05:50–01:05:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:05:55–01:05:56 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:00–01:06:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:08–01:06:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:36–01:06:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:46–01:06:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:52–01:07:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:29–01:07:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:31–01:07:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
chairs will call the question. All in favor, saying aye. Aye. And the nays, eyes have it unanimously. Proceeding on to item number six, consideration of zoning text amendment, appendix A, article 13, section 22 of the city of
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:48–01:07:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Code, amending tree protection and preservation standards and procedures related to the waivers of these requirements. Okay, and I will listen to the planner.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:08:18–01:08:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:08:20–01:08:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in the audience would like to um address this concern about the the Byron Memorial Justice Assistance, better known as JAG grant program? My apologies. I'm just so, I believe in this. This has been a great, um JAG grant program and it's helped the city.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:08:41–01:08:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:08:55–01:08:56 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:08:58–01:08:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:23–01:09:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
amending procedures related to waivers of tree protection and preservation requirements, providing for the repeal ‸ prior and consistent ordinances and resolutions, corporation into the code, severability, and an
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:51–01:09:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
preservation code that will be overseen by Planning ‸ Zoning Board. And the treatment irrigation requests that had any monetary value will be heard by the City Council. So in summary, the changes that we have for this new preservation ordinance will be the revision of the tree definition, revising replacement standards for palms, increasing the minimum land donation size requirements for um land and conservation will be lands they're conveying to the city as conservation. So we're raising that from one half acre and it will be one acre now on and from 70 feet, 75 feet will be increased to 125 feet. And also we are revising the waiver process that will be discussed today. ‸ So as you can see, um the definition that we have for the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:21–01:11:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the replacement criteria for palm trees for every palm tree measuring 12 inches or more in diameter of breast height, a replacement tree with a minimum size of
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:48–01:11:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:00–01:12:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:15–01:12:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
acre in a width of 125 feet unless the city council approves otherwise. ‸ This amendment encourages larger conservation spaces and rewards tree preservation. So currently all waiver requests go to the board of adjustments, including those regarding landscape code requirements and tree preservation. Under this new revision
will be heard before the planning zoning board. however if that request involves an elimination or reduction of any monetary value, will be heard before the City Council, who will make the final decision. So, the amendment aligns with the City of
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:13:08–01:13:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
comprehensive plan, particularly in areas related to sustainable development in urban beautification. By refining landscape and tree preservation standards, this ordinance will enhance compliance with local zoning codes designated to support the City's environmental and community health objectives. so staff
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:13:35–01:13:36 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:13:44–01:13:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and replacement requirements with specific guidelines for palms. And to clarify the waiver requests to the above section of the zoning code will be overseeing by the planning zoning board. And
As we discussed before, the proposed changes will include the revision for the tree definition, the replacement standards for palms, increasing the minimum land donation size requirements for conveyance of land for conservation. And
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:14:40–01:14:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:14:44–01:14:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:56–01:15:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
If they have available normally this is more associated associated with multi-family developments there are PUD. Right. So when they're um you know so normally the the they have the acreage to make it available to try to negotiate and and a good example would be Adamson Creek. Right. They have a huge conservation area in that area that was dedicated to the city in the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:15:49–01:15:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Mayor if I may. Yes sir. that They again they're not required to make any donation but if they choose to make a donation of land then they don't get credits until um under this revision until it's a one acre and a minimum of a 125 feet. uh in size there so okay
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:16:13–01:16:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
there so again it goes from uh currently if they choose to donate for purposes of receiving credit towards tree mitigation it's currently one half acre and 75 feet this would be raised to one acre and 125
‸ Okay. And my other question is about when you say they get credit how much of a credit do they get what what is a credit equal to in dollars? go back a couple of slides.
uh well normally uh every development they have to have a tree inventory that is done so there's you know they provide landscape plans a tree inventory so there's a whole analysis that is done before they we can take these credits in consideration. Right.
I just didn't know um what a credit was equal to in in dollar value you know I mean it's eight credits eight hundred dollars or what what does is that is that how it works?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:17:22–01:17:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:17:28–01:17:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:17:33–01:17:33 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:17:34–01:17:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:17:44–01:17:44 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
and and that part I understood I just didn't see anywhere what a credit would equal to in dollar and uh back to the developer as far as that goes. ‸ I was just curious on that score as to how these credits add
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:11–01:18:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:25–01:18:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:18:38–01:18:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. And so that's a three to one ratio. So every tree whatever the whatever the inch diameter is there that's in the conservation area you get credit for three trees times whatever the cost that Lucy just went over.
Well I'm in favor of the um the palm tree because I do think they are trees people moved to Florida for our palm trees. So okay thank you very much for your answers. Appreciate that. I'm done. Is
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:16–01:19:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
right. um okay first of all I want to say thank you for increasing the minimum area and the reason that's really important is that we see this when they're
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:19:39–01:19:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
for wildlife that you have to have uh from an environmental management standpoint you have to have kind of a minimum amount of land for it for it even to have any ecosystem benefit. So yes. So that's good and uh also I think um uh ‸ leaving the mitigation to council and moving um the others to the uh tree board is is more appropriate. um
was concerned initially because it seemed like we were downgrading the palms because they did not have they were not as we were prioritizing ecologically beneficial tree species. ‸ and palm trees do have ecological benefit and therefore provide ecosystem services to us.
a 12 inch diameter. um But my real concern is the, probably my biggest concern and more of a concern since we spoke earlier, is the three inch replacement tree.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:21:20–01:21:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:21:47–01:21:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
replacement for palms it's all, it's all in the ball, the size of the ball is, is how they, uh how they measure those trees and determine if they can transplant them or not. um okay
What is the value of the mitigation banks? Because I understand that's the issue that there was a fairness issue that some developers say, uh say the framework group, say, uh the, the cirrus development did not have a tree mitigation. I don't believe they did because they were developing developed land. They were redeveloping land versus,
do what you want on private property provided you have the right approvals, but we have the opportunity to encourage a certain kind of development. Our comp plan makes really clear that we want, that we want to encourage low impact development
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:24:10–01:24:11 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
pushing building. But this is an opportunity for us to encourage the right kind of building and also that mitigation bank becomes an opportunity to create, uh you know, our streets with arbors and and more trees in our city where they're appropriate.
I want ‸ to be realistic. And I don't want to short change the palm trees because, um as was explained to me today, they are the pollinator hotspots. And there are certain birds that only like those kind of, a certain kind of palm. And they really attract the bees and they, um they're good at absorbing the storm water and breaking the, the storm energy, um as well as, absorbing carbon dioxide, producing the air we breathe. So, um so I'd like to hear the analysis, please. Yeah.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:25:39–01:25:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you're correct. So we, we, we revised last year the landscaping ordinance, um made a number of revisions. We've, we've had time to live under that ordinance. um and so, uh we, we, as staff really, really had one recommendation as, you
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:17–01:26:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Those are, those are the properties that, that are, uh uh 200 plus acres. um they, they, um they the palms are identified, but not the species of palms in those, uh in those two projects there. And so, ‸ the palm issue is, is trying to strike a balance between, uh protecting, uh the environment and, um meeting the objective of the comprehensive plan and at the same time not discourage development.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:00–01:27:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in terms of protecting the environment, meeting the goals of the, uh of the comprehensive plan. And, I, and ‸ I'll do that by way of, of, uh comparing us against, if you will, the competition, uh Brevard County does not require ‸ replacement of palms. And so in Brevard County,
here. We still have a requirement to replace a palm and we're not requiring you to replace it with, um with a palm like for like. You can replace a palm with an oak ‸ tree. um and if you decide to replace a palm with a palm, then that can't be any greater than,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:05–01:28:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:16–01:28:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:21–01:28:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:31–01:28:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:32–01:28:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:51–01:28:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and so again, we're, we're trying to present something that, uh does not discourage development and again at the same time uh protects the environment. We believe that this actually achieves that.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:29:27–01:29:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
and and we, and again, we we've not removed them. Again, again okay so I'll compare us to the competition. The county, again, doesn't require you to replace palms. We still do. We just... uh We believe that, and again, if you look at this chart, in the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:23–01:30:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:49–01:30:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:53–01:30:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
tree protection, preservation standards, and procedures related to waivers of these... Requirements. And I'm looking for a second. Second. Got a second by Councilman going. Okay, now, chair, would like to close this portion to Council over to the public. If you have any concerns, please come forward. State your name. Submit a card. Going once. Going twice. Thank you,
Proceeding on to the next item. um Let me make sure I'm squared away here. Consideration of zoning. Text Amendment Appendix A, Article 5 of the Code of the City of
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:31:52–01:31:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to define transportation terminals. A permitted use applicable to the properties located in the M-1 zoning district, and as a special exception use in the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:32:04–01:32:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
properties located to general commercial district and commercial mixed use pud's And this is the first reading of this. Esquire Garganese, would you like to expound on this before we turn it over to the plan?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:32:29–01:32:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:32:41–01:32:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:32:42–01:32:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
effective date. This is ‸ first reading of this ordinance, also a public hearing item. that was pretty self-explanatory. There's been some interpretation issues regarding
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:08–01:33:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:28–01:33:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:34:13–01:34:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
general explanation, uh special exceptions allow certain uses not typically permitted under certain zoning districts and are granted under center conditions and criteria by the board of adjustments The transportation terminal is a permitted
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:34:32–01:34:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:34:36–01:34:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to include less intensive intensive activities. This cumulative zoning approach helps limited heavy industrial traffic, offering added protection for nearby residentials in no commercial areas. As you can see, um actually I don't have a highlight
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:34:57–01:35:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:35:11–01:35:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
zoning. the So, it would be uh the main idea was to affect those areas, and of course, uh the special exceptions under the CG and mixed use PUDs also will be affected. um I just have a quick um request for Monica, if you can just please verify the ordinance has the right definition, because I'm not sure if you was included with the agenda,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:35:41–01:35:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
oh the last sentence, ‸ Okay. Facilities used primarily for short-term or long-term parking of vehicles should not be considered transportation terminals.
So here we have the definition, let me know if you have any questions about transportation terminal. I just want to highlight that um the proposed zoning tax amendment is anticipated to assist in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:36:40–01:36:41 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:36:44–01:36:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
plan, following the future land use element and the transportation element. So staff concluded that the proposed ‸ changes will align with the goals set
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:53–01:36:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:37:09–01:37:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:37:33–01:37:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
right there we go saying that Chair, like to close this portion to Council over to the public. Please come forward and state your name. You have three minutes to elaborate or expound on this particular item right here. yes going once And the Zoning Board approved this unanimously. Going twice. children close this portion to the public and return of the Council. What are the wishes of Council? i'll move to approve. We have a motion on the floor by Councilwoman Weeks, second by the Chair.
gonna ‸ call the question. All in favor, saying aye. Aye. aye eyes have a unanimous. Proceeding on to the next item, which is the last and final item of public hearing, consideration of the first reading of expedited State Review Comprehensive Plan
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:36–01:38:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:37–01:38:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:40–01:38:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
relating to the mixed use future land use category to provide an additional flexibility for allowable use on the ground floor of the vertical mix use building eligible for density bonus under the Comprehensive Plan.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:35–01:39:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
building and up to 125 long units per acre for vertical mixed use projects in a very limited geographic area identified a policy 1.1.2.6 of the comprehensive plan
development agreement by the City Council under certain terms and conditions being necessary and acceptable to the City Council for the repeal of prior and consistent ordinances and resolutions the cooperation into the Comprehensive Plan so everybody had an effective date with
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:40:22–01:40:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:40:36–01:40:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:40:50–01:40:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the record. uh Again, this is a city initiated text amendment uh to the mixed use future land use category policy 1.1.2.6 f to allow greater flexibility of ground floor uses In vertically integrated mixed use buildings. To simplify vertically integrated mixed use buildings is a combination of different uses in the same building. The current policy requires ground
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:41:22–01:41:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:41:40–01:41:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
non-commercial residential uses. the mixed use future land use category is primarily in the southeast portion of the city. This area outlined in purple is approximately 110 acres in size. The objective of this amendment is to encourage infill redevelopment while ‸ activating street frontages.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:18–01:42:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:42:25–01:42:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:43:08–01:43:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that would require a development agreement. This authorizes no development. uh Lastly, the policy does not change the allowable uses and limits allowable uses subject to the underlining zoning.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:35–01:44:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:43–01:44:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the bottom floor of a vertically integrated mixed-use building. uh The proposed amendment complies with the land development code review criteria for the comprehensive plan amendments. As noted,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:01–01:45:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
no impact on existing public facilities has no impact on environmental or historic resources has no effect on surrounding neighborhood compatibility. and is consistent with the city's comprehensive plan as well as the state's comprehensive plan. Staff recommends approval. In addition, the planning
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:24–01:45:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
with the city's vision. uh I want to note again, this does not change the density or intensity of a mixed use. And any development that's utilized, this amendment will be subject to site plan review and approval. Happy to answer any questions. We
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:55–01:46:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
doesn't affect the density. um But the five units in a mixed use development, you get five additional units per acre. Right? And it's a bonus. You get that bonus if you provide the benefit of mixed use on your first floor.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:22–01:46:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
just wouldn't get the bonus. Because we give the bonus because we want to encourage that mixed use. Because that mixed use serves the density, serves the vitality of the surrounding area.
Correct. Yes. And that's, that's, that's the point of this amendment is to, um vitalize and activate the street frontage. This ‸ amendment only, uh reapportions the requirement for commercial uses versus residential uses
um and, and I don't have a big problem for this overall with a lot of the areas in our city. But I know Nick Herring from the framework group was here at the planning and zoning meeting. And I know that he really wants this. This is, um and
And before anyone tries to paint me as someone that doesn't like the framework group, I love the framework group. I love the serious development. I love the fact that they try to do mostly what they do is redevelopment. So they're the kind of player we want here, but on that bank of America in front of our park in, I mean, that is our most precious space in the village. And
the question again. Okay. When we do a PUD and someone comes to us for concessions, concessions that take away from the social use of that area that take away the benefits to the everyday
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:49:10–01:49:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we have that negotiating power. And all these conferences we go to they encourage us to use that negotiating power to get what we want. To get a city that we want to live in because of course
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:03–01:50:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:50:17–01:50:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um and we we do a lot of negotiating a lot of asking up front. if I think the first question I ask is okay what do you have that benefits the city you know‸ and that may be in terms of land donation. I mean we've done quite well in the last couple of developments um and so again just in terms of understanding your
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:46–01:50:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
certain requirements open space requirements all those other requirements there. I don't know that you you can negotiate a development agreement that puts you in conflict with the comprehensive plan. which what your fingers
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:10–01:51:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:13–01:51:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:51:16–01:51:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that All the developers, they have to follow comp plan. In the past, since I've seen all the developments, the major developments that we have, all the development agreements, um the the main exchange sometimes is related to trees, right? So, tree credit, for mitigation in exchange for amenities or um elevations or things like in that nature, ‸ there are
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:51:51–01:51:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:57–01:51:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Even with the tree, now those will come, if if it's if it has anything to do with the fee, the mitigation amount, it comes to it comes to you guys. the um the the And so, and so
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:53:02–01:53:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:53:12–01:53:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
okay so getting back to the purpose of mixed use, to create vitality. I'm like, you know, ‸ most of the properties we have, this would not bother me. But with Bank of America and the fact that it's, that is our main drag. I mean,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:53:45–01:53:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:54:01–01:54:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
overall. And here's another place I'm coming from. And that is, um you know, when I lived in dc and had to walk seven blocks from the metro to work, I would always avoid those blocks.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:54:25–01:54:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
feet and whatever. I would avoid those blocks that were, they were either, ‸ I don't know, covered parking or whatever they were. That's where the homeless hung out. That was, for security reasons, I would avoid it. It created that.that
So it's another thing to consider in terms of this, this policy and this policy being in uh probably our most traveled couple of blocks, most important center within the village. And again, trying to keep the character of the character of
trying to build the vitality of the village to serve that more dense population. And we're looking at, you know, once that's built, once the uh rock ledge development is finished, and once we have something on seven acres, I mean,
area. And having those storefronts, having those services, keeps them there, keeps it walkable, keeps it viable, and keeps us an attraction and not just a high-end apartment building. So that is what I don't like about this. Like I say, it's that Bank of America property in regard to this
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:56:07–01:56:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh tax abatement. um ‸ We've already done their bidding to bring the height up. So, I mean, I think we've been pretty amenable with them. I think we're going to be a great location for them.
Yeah, ‸ just a, just a, ‸ couple of things there. Patrick, can we go over the last bullet point again? And then, and then let's talk about, I'm looking, yeah, you
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:56:32–01:56:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:56:38–01:56:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:56:48–01:56:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:56:57–01:57:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:57:18–01:57:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
restricted to residential uses. This all, this. Is included for non-commercial uses. So this, in this includes, uh residential fitness centers. So if, ‸ a department complex has a fitness center or they have a leasing office or a maintenance building, those two could be on, on the bottom floor as well.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:57:59–01:57:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:58:04–01:58:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:58:18–01:58:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:58:32–01:58:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:58:52–01:58:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:58:58–01:59:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:59:01]▶ PlaySpeaker 26 (introduced as “Linda Dolphin” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:59:32–01:59:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:59:33]▶ PlaySpeaker 26 (introduced as “Linda Dolphin” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:59:46–01:59:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:59:49]▶ PlaySpeaker 26 (introduced as “Linda Dolphin” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
30 or 60 40 just so that that majority rings a little bit truer? That would be my only recommendation. Thank you. Can
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:00:13–02:00:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:00:28–02:00:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:00:45–02:00:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I just had a quick question so with this any project that came before came in it would still have to be approved as far as what they're going to do with that mixed-use correct? Yes, ma'am. It still goes to the same through the same
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:01:54–02:01:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:02:00–02:02:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:02:12–02:02:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and and she had limited to expound on anything what's the rule on that because I know I had to leave the room I know once upon a time she said ‸ the back of the room I'm just trying to get this understanding.
elected officials, is an opportunity to participate if they so choose I ‸ generally advise not to participate when you have a voting conflict. But if a councilmember feels that it's necessary to contribute some sort of factual information to the discussion discussion ‸ you know I think that would be be permissible. Define factual. Something that's not advocacy. Okay.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:03:24–02:03:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
go ahead yep because I have to recuse myself before I did that I wanted to offer facts that are incorrect in the agenda item, and that would be the amount that
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:03:44–02:03:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:04:01–02:04:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:04:05–02:04:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
okay so, this septic to sewer, has been before the council a number of times, and obviously I'm new I'm trying to get to my there it is and so I wanted to start off by saying that I want to move to approve the option two in the plan in the J&K area with cost overruns to be paid by utility ratepayers Now from my rationale on this is, sewer makes the most sense. advanced septic
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:05:14–02:05:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
at least to maintain talking to people who've already put this in and they can break and then they need replacing sewer is a one and done. we have a state and county mandate for it. The
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:05:40–02:05:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
out and the actual cost to hook their home up to sewer would have been about half of the estimate but of course you always want to figure high better to have too much money than ‸ Not enough. Also with this sewer the homeowners home values will increase because homes with sewer are worth more than homes with septic. And again the state and county have already mandated that they want everybody to either hook up to sewer or go to the advanced septic
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:06:28–02:06:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:06:42–02:06:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as in the past I've been an advocate of this project as well um I definitely see the reasoning why we need it um it's always been an issue with the funding um recently I spoke to a resident over on cocoa place um they're on septic as well in that location. And, uh there was a concern to them
I I did say that yes um although I know from looking at the numbers before there was enough money to pay for all the, all the homeowners to get hooked up. The sorrel money will cover that. So.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:02–02:08:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the additional dollars that that we uh lobbied for. um Remember, those were going to be a match to uh whatever funding that had an expiration date on it, so so I wouldn't count those dollars there so if sorrel has 7.2 sorrel has 7.2 for the project project what is the project cost is an unknown number at this particular point in time.
yeah so uh those costs uh just being fiscally responsible is is definitely a concern I'm taking that into consideration, uh especially after dealing with the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:54–02:08:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:09:26–02:09:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that popped up. So uh just me being uh fiscally responsible and hearing from other citizens um I'm just trying to make sure we're weighing out every uh detail uh to this project um the last time we brought this up I had a couple legal questions and I'm hoping
on that. uh One of my questions were as far as the mandatory hookups, are we able to designate that only to the 88 homes along India River Drive and not to the rest of the uh city? That's on septic. one of my questions there
I mean that's uh ‸ you know we've talked about that before that's that's a that's a possibility um based on the tetra tech report I mean the council would have to make a legislative finding that just this group of 88 should be treated specially,
Now, the question is whether or not we as I understand the councilman's question is whether we could the city can just impose a mandate just on the 88 homes. It's not a question of whether they get sewer or advanced septic. It's a question of if you go sewer, can the city mandate that they hook up? Because obviously, um if the city was going to go to city council were to decide to go forward with sewer
as I understand it 100 participation will be required so 100 participation is required not only for funding purposes. um it's going to be, if it's going to be required,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:11:49–02:11:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
needs to be an enforcement mechanism. So the city council will have to establish not only the mandate, but in the enforcement mechanism, ‸ perhaps, um to, cover any differences. If the council's decision is, that the homeowners would cover the differences, not the general rate payers who don't stand to benefit from this particular. um
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:12:16–02:12:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:12:21–02:12:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:12:27–02:12:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
into my second question, which was the, uh if there was any overages on this project, uh obviously the one way to get that, uh that funding would have to be like a special, uh ‸ special assessment on the rate payers of utilities. um is there any way that there were overages, just that location receiving this project, the benefits from this project, uh could that fee, uh a special assessment fall only on those 88 homes and not the whole city or even our, uh
and that legal test first and foremost requires a special benefit to the property owners that are, that ‸ have to pay. So ‸ you know, I would get, I would take, uh you know, an educated go on the limb here that if, if you, if you have a differential for this sewer project that only benefits the 88 homes,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:13:57–02:13:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the city's going to be in a position to say that other property owners receive a special benefit and therefore should pay part of an assessment. um because special, you know, special assessments require special benefits to the property owners You know, they have to be receiving the benefit directly. It's a legal test. gotcha
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:14:27–02:14:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:15:05–02:15:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 02:15:33–02:15:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
just have to put the pipes in that way to hook up to it. So it's already there. It's just, we need the sideways stuff and then to hook up to the homes. And again, I just really feel strongly that this is something that we need to do. For us and for the future. And it does make their homes more valuable.
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:16:20–02:16:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. um First on the list is Frank Sullivan, then Al Vasquez, then Alec Greenwood. If you have a card, please submit your card. I already have your card. That's why I'm calling your name. thank you sir
I'm 87 years old now. You leave your boat in the river and the next morning you'd have six or seven mullet. Dead in the bottom of it because they jump around at night. If you wanted a good shrimp dinner on the weekend, if you had a dip net,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:17:11–02:17:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
kind of confused because I'm hearing you all start talking about the benefit ‸ to raising the cost of the house, the value of the house. We're not talking about
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:17:30–02:17:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:17:32–02:17:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
on everything you paid you bought. We've been arguing about this for the last year and a half with you all. It's not the value of the house. It's the value of the lagoon and
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:17:47–02:17:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:17:54–02:17:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:18:04–02:18:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ to uh get rid of the septic tanks. And the answer he got back from Tallahassee was, we've already put a couple hundred million dollars out there and they haven't taken advantage of it. We're not giving them any more money. So somewhere along the line, uh
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:18:30–02:18:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
months ago. And uh all these other questions didn't come up then. I don't know where this is coming from, but I was hoping that we might get a legitimate council vote tonight to get this behind us and do something not for the value of your house, but
evening. i'm uh It's nice to see some familiar faces. uh I am a managing partner for Close Waters LLC. We're a firm that does forward-looking economic impacts and we did the uh 2016 economic impact for the referendum that uh that was passed uh and and uh I recognize some faces from that activity. That was one of the best things I've ever seen in government. uh I was here two and a half years ago when this was discussed before and uh I found out it was still being discussed. uh that That's a concern to me. And I'm here uh pro bono uh on the on behalf of
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:20:01–02:20:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:20:04–02:20:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:20:09–02:20:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
was in 2016 dollars the downside of not addressing these nutrient pollution problems was uh 4.3 billion of that So, toxic algal blooms which can happen near sources of nutrient pollution where these houses are that you're considering today can have a very devastating effect.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:20:52–02:21:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:21:09–02:21:09 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
This project is just the beginning of some 400 houses, as I understand, but it is a beginning and uh it'sit's it's critical. There are only three ways to reduce this nutrient pollution from septic septic tanks. One is people leave. That's probably not something that you want to look at, but that's one way. The other way are these uh systems that are called advanced septic to uh advanced septic systems. those are That's the most expensive way to go. i I know some people that have done that on their own on
uh They require a lot of maintenance. It's very, very expensive to go that way. And the third way is this connection to the uh you know to the city sewage processing system, which is a very refined uh system that is, uh we know it works. So the situation for uh
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:22:05–02:22:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
is that these have to be done in order to comply with the law, with the uh you know administrative law. If it is not done, there will be fines. But the fines are nothing compared to the uh economic impact of not doing it. So I urge you to take advantage of the fact that there's money being offered right now and do it because it has to be done. Good luck. Thank you.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:22:35–02:22:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:22:52–02:22:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and I just have a simple question. It's not an issue of whether we want this to be done. The reason why it's been delayed is because of doing it in a way that is not so cost prohibitive and also other ways of solving this issue about the nutrients that go into the river.
uh for this advanced septic tank systems that I need to contradict what was stated earlier. It is not the most expensive way to go. I have a lot of people that prefer to go that way that have told me about solving this. They also have suggested that they'd like to be responsible for it.
for the advanced septic tank system, and work with them or uh assisting them in some way of uh helping that to be installed rather than a complete brand new system, which means, and a lot of people don't like talking about it,
to a lot of the costs. But the main thing is you're going to alter permanently what we have now on any river drive. And I'm talking about trees. they The majority of them are in the way. Some of the septic the septic tanks that we're talking about is in the rear of some of these properties. They're not in the front. These are homes that were built in the 1920s. And that can really add up. Now, the advanced septic tank systems, they last lifetimes. Now, there is maintenance on them and all that, but it doesn't equal in the multi-millions. ‸ There's the difference. The other problem is where they're located. These are very old, established homes, and you're going to be ruining not just River Road about how you're going to have to get it installed there, which means removing trees and things like that that are even on the ‸ property that's not even on River Road. So is it possible that there could be another method that could be less expensive? It's always best to go where you go to the route where you can get the problem solved and corrected without having to spend a lot of money. And I think really that if that's something that could be looked further into, I think that's the route that we need to go because uh
It's less expensive. uh And you're working with the citizens because a lot of them flat will not be happy having to pay like what they're seeing other people that are going to have to pay that can afford it and not everybody can. I really feel that we need to pursue this a little further. uh
and all that. That's not how you make decisions. We need to actually find something that could actually be beneficial financially for everybody to get this done without altering permanently the way
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:26:17–02:26:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:26:40–02:26:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:26:43]▶ PlaySpeaker 26 (introduced as “Linda Dolphin” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I would be asking you to do today would
[02:26:45]▶ PlaySpeaker 26 (introduced as “Linda Dolphin” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:26:45–02:26:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:26:49]▶ PlaySpeaker 26 (introduced as “Linda Dolphin” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
us to do would be to go out and get the project to bid and
[02:26:54]▶ PlaySpeaker 26 (introduced as “Linda Dolphin” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
bid maybe it'll come in at way more than the 12 million that we have the high estimate for and then the Council can say this makes no sense. We have to reconsider but until we get a bid we're just continuing to push these numbers around. My second um thought would be I forgot it. um Let
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:27:20–02:27:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:27:22]▶ PlaySpeaker 26 (introduced as “Linda Dolphin” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
um thinking about the fact that then there's going to be a lot of cost overruns and that could be the case um because even though we get a bid in, you know, once they start the project, they could run into problems. But as Pat mentioned, we have a lot of opportunities to get money for this project. It's something that the state and the county are really pushing and the money is all free to us now and it won't be for long. So I really would encourage you to approve Pat's motion. thank you
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:27:57–02:28:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I i don't ‸ you know I've never built a perfect project where it went in and came in exactly on budget. um And there's been a number of projects that have gone way over budget for different reasons. every Every project is unique. Every project takes risk. It's just that simple. I mean, I think overall, in my opinion, for this project, I think we should less think less about the numbers and think more about what
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:29:11–02:29:11 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
kind of been talking about, which is how Councilwoman Weeks brought it up, which is policy. It's this is really the numbers will be the numbers. The agenda item wasn't updated. We didn't spend a lot of time with this. We brought it back at her request. But
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:29:37–02:29:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
don't know. I mean, they went up by a couple ‸ percent, but did construction go up by one or two or three percent? These are these are tough questions to ask ‸ You
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:29:48–02:29:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:29:56–02:29:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
percent or less with something as high risk as this, which is on the coast in Coquina Rock that we've researched and done geotech work on and know that it's there, even though that
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:30:18–02:30:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:30:20–02:30:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:30:21–02:30:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:30:22–02:30:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
percent overrun, those numbers can get can get out of control. But again, I don't think it's about trying to add up the numbers because to one of our citizens points that
have to do it. We have to, you know, go out, make an estimate and then go out and then take these you know, take these projects on. i I think it still comes back to whether or not this council is comfortable adopting a policy that would say allow or require the utility to pay for any overages that occur on this project that we
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:30:53–02:31:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
talked about in some of the earlier sessions. That's really what we're talking about. And if we're not comfortable with that, are we comfortable with putting that cost on ‸ on the ‸ Homeowners themselves specific to the area generally in the basin map or generally citywide. Is there a citywide requirement that we would want everybody to eventually connect to sewer and water if it's available and in front of their property. Another policy question that needs to ‸ really be thought about
but just the numbers are going to move and they're going to shift around a bit. And I guess I think fundamentally the council has to come to grips with where these costs should lie. And I would just only just quickly remind you that you are a regional council making a regional water decision about a sewer project where we get, you know, probably 10 or less of our general revenues for projects such as this and 90 come from water. So when the pro when the water project goes over, typically, and there was some sewer in there, but water was driving part of the problem, right? We had a big line on Fisk and had all kinds of things. 90 of our water, our revenues come from water.
to do the capital and get the project done. Not necessarily the same on a sewer. If it's a small change and we have it budgeted, those things can can often be managed. But when we put something in in play this large and this at risk, it has a tendency to have a completely different rub on it. And
this project, and that would be the, if that was the policy that this council would choose. I think that that could raise some eyebrows outside of the city limits of the city of Coco because the other citizens who live outside this area require and rely on this council to act on the city's behalf.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:33:22–02:33:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh one of the workshops that we did. And it was really a number of questions that they asked. But the primary one was that if uh if it was free, there were a lot of people that were up for it. But if there was any
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:33:36–02:33:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:33:39–02:33:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that showed up, said no. We werewe were not supportive. There were costs ‸ And I can understand that. Nobody wants to get hit in the pocket for additional costs. It hurts. And maybe some people can afford it. Maybe some people can't. you know some‸ Some of the homes along there people have inherited or or elderly or on fixed incomes, whatever. And and
with the house was affordable 20, 30, 40 years ago when they bought it. But you know to hit them up for a large. And again, there's also an unknown. we you know You go forward with this policy. We don't know what we're if we were to say we were ‸ Just like it would be for the utility with the citizens. We don't know what the end point would be. If it goes to the citizens, you're basically asking to create a policy and not know what the impact individually to those
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:34:28–02:34:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:34:30–02:34:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:34:31–02:34:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We just, you know, we really don't know. um So, so that again, don't want to get into the dollars, but only the implication of what you have to decide up front here about this
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 02:34:51–02:35:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:35:12–02:35:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:35:15]▶ PlaySpeaker 19 (introduced as “James Smith” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
off. um my name is James Smith. I
[02:35:18]▶ PlaySpeaker 19 (introduced as “James Smith” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:35:18–02:35:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:35:21]▶ PlaySpeaker 19 (introduced as “James Smith” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
uh I've been there for, um over 44 years. And so, uh one of the things I was concerned about is that, or was thinking about was that, uh at one point we didn't have reuse water and the just city decided to, give it to the citizens. But there was a an initial hookup fee that was, um
[02:35:48]▶ PlaySpeaker 19 (introduced as “James Smith” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:35:48–02:35:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:35:50]▶ PlaySpeaker 19 (introduced as “James Smith” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and most people turned it down. So the city went back and said, well, uh it would be better if we just paid for it up front and prorated it to, so they had a, the city by having the citizens use that water and the hookup was virtually free. ‸ the citizens are now paying for that expense, um forever. And so I don't know if they've ever paid that off, but, um I don't see why the same thing couldn't apply here. The other thing I've heard, and I don't know if this is true, is that if they hooked up the 88 or whatever number that is, um people from this area to the sewer, that
[02:36:36]▶ PlaySpeaker 19 (introduced as “James Smith” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:36:47–02:36:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:36:51]▶ PlaySpeaker 19 (introduced as “James Smith” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
that are now on this the sewer system from all the, uh development we've put in. And now these people that have lived here in this neighborhood all this time, now they, you can't, we can't uh afford to give them the sewer
[02:37:10]▶ PlaySpeaker 19 (introduced as “James Smith” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:37:58–02:38:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:38:38–02:38:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we passed the half cent on the Indian River Lagoon and the money is there and I know we can go back and get more if needed because they want us to do this. So, but no wood was done and in the same same vein right there with Coquina it can be done
They want us to come get this money. Right. Well, well, how about the sorrow make a commitment to 100% fun all the overrun or the potential overruns I ‸ mean is it has, have they
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:39:36–02:39:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:39:46–02:39:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
think that's that's I will support it 100% if that's done it is very hard for me to to support it when when we don't know how much commitment that they will have to the funding that can come
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:40:09–02:40:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
because okay I hear that I heard in the last two years about they want us to get this money, but then ‸ we go in and ask for 14 million, then there's a murmur about how much funding they're going to give so I just
I haven't been to the sorrel meetings I don't know the answer to that question but that that's something that the citizens I'm for sure are asking that
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:40:44–02:40:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:40:46–02:40:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
came up and if you read the Tetra tech report, it goes through a methodology that they needed to create. In order to fairly distribute these millions of dollars that they're collecting for this. So think about
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:40:58–02:41:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
proportional to the distance to the Indian River Lagoon and so on and so as you move further and further away the influence of nitrogen and phosphorus diminishes. And therefore the folks that are directly on Indian River Drive within I forget how many 65 yards or whatever it was, get the most reimbursement that divided by or multiplied by the number of units is how we come up to the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:41:27–02:41:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:41:36–02:41:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:41:40–02:41:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
do we wrap up all the funding? And he said, it's all proportional, you know, related to the study so that, you know, everybody has a fair component. Not just, it's not just our component.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:41:59–02:41:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
metrics that have been developed in this big fat text detector tech report. And our section is in there, but it has a methodology that talks about the contributions for nitrogen and phosphorus
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:42:09–02:42:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:42:15–02:42:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
along the coast. And they came up with a metric, you know, is it perfect ‸ you know I don't know I think it's a it's a method in which I think that they all agreed to and adopted so that they would have a way to say, okay, we got
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:42:30–02:42:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
how it's going to apportion to these pots of money and to these particular projects. This is how we're gonna ‸ fund it. so I think to say that you know there's additional monies available I don't know Maybe if the committee decides they want to change that policy, then yes. As it stands today
can get per lot. And we've also chased and grant and asked them for the contingency because they tucked away a little contingency and we said, hey, we you know we think we're gonna ‸ probably need that right up front. And they wrote us a letter saying that, yeah, you could go ahead and use that contingency money as well, add that together to what you have. So, but, but based on today, that's max that I think we're gonna get does that mean it couldn't change no ‸ potentially could change next year the year after but but it's not it's ‸ as far as I know and maybe they didn't in Brevard County
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:43:43–02:43:44 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
‸ so from the feeling I'm getting this motion sounds like is on the verge of dying but I want to prevent that from happening and keep this going so here's a solution I want to offer there are some questions that I need to have answered and
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:44:18–02:44:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:44:25–02:44:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:44:31–02:44:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:44:52–02:44:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
have brought to the council because this although it was put on the agenda it was not much new information added but I see the importance why I needed to come on the agenda there can be some options for the council to choose as ‸ control mechanisms or, enforcement mechanisms for the mandatory hookups. because right now we're saying mandatory hookups, but what is the enforcement? we know there are some people on, on the 88, homes that don't want to go to this. we heard a couple ‸ meetings ago when we discussed this as well.
so if that can be brought back to the council as well as within that same language only having ‸ the mandatory hookups to that 88 homes only as I stated
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:46:03–02:46:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
distance and they just, they, they can't imagine the hardship of having to, have that increase in their utilities right now although we haven't raised taxes taxes go up because property values going up
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:46:29–02:46:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
love to table this and have that action I just stated happen immediately not something six months from now we can get that axe and have those findings come back to the council I would appreciate it so
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:46:55–02:46:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:46:59–02:47:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I.e. if they would commit to funding any cost overruns associated with our project We would come back and advise you of potential enforcement actions. and the mandatory hookup, of more of
all the residents along that location as well to attend those meetings and express the same sentiment if you you bring to the council the importance of why we need this to happen
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:47:52–02:47:53 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
power in numbers so the same way we come to this council with the passion I would ask that you attend that meeting as well and and let them know why we need this is done. And we need the extra funding. So it's in the council hands at this moment.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:48:16–02:48:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the machine readings disagree here · 02:48:27–02:48:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:48:42–02:48:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
enforcement mechanism mechanism mechanism gonna ‸ be twofold. One is gonna ‸ be a, you know, if this council decides to require homeowners to pay the difference, then you got a cost financing enforcement issue. ‸ then the other enforcement issue of course is, requiring the property owners to actually do, the capital work on their own property required to hook up so I mean those two issues I will be happy to look
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:49:14–02:49:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:49:15–02:49:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:49:38–02:49:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 02:49:39–02:49:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
ma'am. So, so you're gonna ‸ amend your motion to table this item? Yes. Again, for additional future information that will be applicable to septic to sewer conversion.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:50:24–02:50:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the machine readings disagree here; a language review questioned the wording · 02:50:32–02:50:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:50:42–02:50:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
if the answer comes back and it's still the same. Booyah. Okay. We have a motion on the floor. Just gonna ‸ call the question. All in favor saying hi all right nana's eyes have a unanimous just the fact finding information correct correct all right okay you may come
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:51:01–02:51:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:51:18–02:51:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:51:26–02:51:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:51:28]▶ PlaySpeaker 14 (introduced as “Stuart Buchanan” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
um these are the reports from staff um I think you guys previously announced this out this I don't recall that this is our first meeting back from the CRA conference ‸ said but again just acknowledging that we did win an award for our for our ‸ our affordable housing project over in the
in our in our annual food drive I think we are winners the last two out of the three years or maybe three years in a row and so that collection event happens at uh the Walmart on Monday November 25th from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. and again that's in support of the annual competition that benefits the ‸ sharing center for the food drive competition between cocoa and Rockledge
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:52:54–02:53:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:53:05–02:53:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:53:10–02:53:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:53:19–02:53:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; words the first reading may have missed · 02:53:22–02:53:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:53:34–02:53:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:53:39–02:53:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:53:57–02:54:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:54:01–02:54:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and that was hard to do because they're all so cute. You know, you want to give them all a prize. So, uh but it was an honor to do that. And um so I was glad, you know, to be asked to do that. And uh I've attended all kinds of things, and but I will get into all that next week because I'm short on sleep at the
just got a couple things. All right. This was uh this past Saturday. uh The youth football team that I coached they won the Super Bowl uh championship. um
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:54:54–02:54:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:55:00–02:55:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:55:10–02:55:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
along with council members as well along and Mr. Brown. uh As you're aware, ‸ winner of the um um Housing Initiative Award, um and that's for the Michael C. Blake subdivision.
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; words the first reading may have missed · 02:55:40–02:55:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:55:49–02:55:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:55:50–02:55:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I think they're they're based out of somewhere out of state, um but it was kind of neat that I kind of ran across it, but it just shows how a small town is uh on the lips of a
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:56:01–02:56:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
took them down to uh Miami Dolphin game, and we all took the uh bright line uh from Orlando. And uh it was neat for the kids five and six years old to um
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:56:28–02:56:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to do something after the election um and i in my district, but also um for other council members to come as well, if they had anything to share with the community. um Only people would probably have there is uh law enforcement, code enforcement, um solid waste, which would be public works, um at the Family Promise building, uh which is the old fire station
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:56:58–02:57:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:57:31–02:57:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:57:43–02:57:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:57:51–02:57:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:57:52–02:57:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:57:57–02:57:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:58:03–02:58:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and his family. um also, I wanted to put this in the air now. It's something I'm going to be looking for uh at the beginning of next year and I'm bringing it up now because I think it may take some coordination for it. But, um as we talk about our vision and uh accomplishes some of our initiatives for the city next year, um I would like to coordinate, um some type of event for the council. I don't know if you have to put us all in different vehicles and we each ride with the city staff, ‸ if we could be uh put in the same van, but i would like for us to take a tour around the whole city all 15.4 miles of the city of coco
um Everybody takes ‸ take notes. and We bring it back when we uh have our meeting, um ‸ you know when we want to make our improvements, what our uh our goals are. um I think that's the only way we're going to really get a fair assessment of what needs to be done in the city if we're all putting eyes on it at the same time.
but somehow I'm sure we have a great staff that can coordinate that. And uh so, like I said, I'm putting it out in the air now because I ‸ really want itwant it to happen at the beginning of the year before we even get into budget talk, anything like that. So, um
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:59:33–02:59:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:59:37–02:59:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:59:42–02:59:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:59:48–02:59:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:59:58–03:00:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:00:04–03:00:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 03:00:13–03:00:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:00:23–03:00:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:00:40–03:00:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
was gonna ‸ say, I'm just to add a fact to our last conversation, the last item. And that fact is that many municipalities have gone after this money, have had money, have gotten matching grants from the state. And citizens, not one citizen has had to pay yet. now That's just a fact. uh
is based on the amount of nitrogen that is prevented from going into the lagoon. That is in the language of the referendum. okay um And it's a fact that there are lots of contingencies available. okay um district
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:01:40–03:01:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And there was, but it was really unsuccessful because it was impossible to communicate in that particular facility. um It was not set up for facilitating a meeting like that. And so these are tentative dates, but um we're going to do
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:02:10–03:02:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:02:21–03:02:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
attendees and there is a lot of interest. So you have to be in a place where the meeting can't be taken over and where people that are there to genuinely listen have the opportunity to do so and ask questions. So, um oh so I know that next year we will do it in the Florida Solar Energy Center, which has great facility for that, but attracts a different kind of audience. And that's why I've been playing with the different facilities because it seems like I get different people according to where I am.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:03:05–03:03:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Day. So that was great. And they're in the midst of a fundraising drive right now. So it's really happy to get the word out for them. We had flute players, uh Native Plant Society ‸ was there, um a lot to appreciate in the
And this was actually, this is two months old, that figure. So, I'm not sure what it is now, but they've had almost 4 000 visitors. Yeah. And they have big groups coming in. on the left hand side Yeah. Yep. and um anyway, so, and that's without any kind of publicity, really. That's without having any sort of ability to capture visitors names and addresses to be able to market to them. So, if we had, you know, even uh mildly, even a mild effort to uh promote it would uh increase those numbers, I'm sure. And then lastly, last week, uh the mayor and I went to the Florida League of Cities Legislative Committees, and I am on the Utilities and Natural Resources Committee. the uh probably This is likely, we we chose two different issues, then in December we'll choose one issue, but I'm sure this is the one that we will land on. um the This will, um this legislation will probably,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:04:33–03:04:33 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
been coming up every year, every couple of years, but this time the uh the folks that we're actually pushing against it are no longer in office. So um we expect it will have legs. I don't think it's a threat to
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:04:49–03:04:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:04:51–03:04:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:04:59–03:05:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:05:38–03:05:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um well, let me just go back to this and say there's so many utility issues. The one we discussed tonight, the lead and copper rule, the, uh you know, the water issues. We have the storm water issues. um we have lots of things coming up. And we no longer have an operating utilities advisory board. It was allowed to sunset just by not meeting. I would like to see it. We never, as a council, we did not make the policy decision to get rid of the committee. And there is no other time where we have needed it more than now. ‸ I would like to see a concerted effort to put that committee together. Because it gives us additional eyes on the issues. It gives us, a additional, another place where questions can be asked and the public can learn about it. And um so anyway, that's what do I need to make a motion?
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 03:06:58–03:07:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
utilities advisory board, which I served on since 2014. And it just expired because the members, that there was not called to meet. i was meeting quarterly. And um the members uh terms expired.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:07:59–03:08:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 03:08:36–03:08:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 03:08:41–03:08:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
okay but I need we need to recruit members so that means it goes on the list to recruit members I would like I would hope that we all understand the importance of the issues and that we looked to recruit members to serve on that board so that it's reflective of the entire city okay so I can expect then that it will be on the next, it will be on social media, we'll start recruiting that way.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:09:29–03:09:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
number of revisions. That committee consists of, there may be some public members there, but there's also members from county staff city staff and so yeah I'm ‸ not ‸ county staff and city staff sitting in a committee talking about our rates, is ‸ was not the goal of there. So let me let me give you a report on on that committee and the committee doesn't
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:10:08–03:10:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
sunset because terms expire I don't you know I don't think that it prescribed regular meetings I think the meetings were as necessary or as called by the council or by the manager. And so, just let me give you staff perspective on that. ‸ not saying that the committee doesn't exist,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:10:29–03:10:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this consult Okay. the reason this comes up now is because throughout these discussions, one of the issue that came up time and time, again and again, in our two-hour discussion last week with other council members from across the state was the whole, what was
I just think that creating more transparency is going to be a good thing for our utility as well as talking about these really complicated issues. ‸ yeah that's it
and I just want to say kudos to everyone that attended and took the photo because that was the pinnacle point of the overall event to me, to be recognized by your peers and have that photo up. It's imperative that we, uh even my grandmother would tell you, a poor frog would praise his own
And if we don't acknowledge the men and women that volunteer their time there, and you, and they go that extra mile I think we should recognize them and acknowledge them like I say Larry from the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:12:52–03:12:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that's uh this coming Friday at 7 p.m what uh beautiful Dick Blake Stadium yes sir uh and the track is by James Folston and eventually I'm assuming um uh coach Snyder he gets him another state championship coat uh
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:13:26–03:13:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:13:43–03:13:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
parents talked to me about uh Mr. City Manager and and Mrs. Morgan as well um about some crosswalks near the school the elementary schools and I'm sure we'll talk about that for the Cambridge location
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:14:03–03:14:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:14:16–03:14:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
budget item whatever you want to call it homeowners ‸ insurance and also I want to talk to you about something very important which is uh sovereign immunity that's where we have to provide a certain um financial obligation from the city to protect our interests And that can be a a healthy, healthy feat. And
meaning municipalities as well and this is house bill 619 I think if I'm not mistaken And it's coming back, ladies and gentlemen. homeowners insurance, get ready. to get ready to escalate.
because that's just the way of the world right now absolutely um last but not least I want to say thank you for the improvements uh Mr. City Manager and Mrs. Morgan for Leon and Jewel Collins Museum um the kids are proud of the improvements I saw
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:15:33–03:15:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
ballot it was clear and concise and you you you know the area of victory and last but not least I want to say thank you to the green and white machine because we do things decent and in order and I'm a firm believer in that and all the unions that supported our campaign from from
to real estate which I'm very proud of too as well first time ever in my 17 year history. And that goes to show you we're moving in the right direction. And ladies and gentlemen, rest assured, we're going to get that contract or that grant from the various organizations, federal agencies, so that
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:16:26–03:16:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
last one to let you down and the last one to throw dirt in your face so I'm a firm believer in that and I believe in staff I believe in council I believe in city manager the city attorney and all the great citizens of COCO
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:16:39–03:16:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:16:46–03:16:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:17:00–03:17:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 03:17:10–03:17:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:17:18–03:17:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I got a lot of people coming. I just didn't know if there was a marine act Yes. Yeah. Same reenactment. You know, i they said sometimes there's refreshments. Do we need to provide refreshments? No, no. They'll take care of
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:17:51–03:17:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:17:58–03:18:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording