Built from the City's minutes records — no AI-written textBriefing final
The City's record
What the City's record shows
Built only from the City's minutes (260_CE_Reg_Minutes_11_16_2023.pdf). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.
Attendance (the roll call)
Listed present when the roll was taken: Lloyd Roberts, George Brown, Chris Davis, Verna Hughes, Sharri Scott, Josue Otero, Melissa Acosta, Dik Muller
Arrived after the roll: Michael Simpson (the minutes note: “6:02”)
(Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
Listed absent: none (the minutes record no absences)
Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Dennis Bunt (Code Enforcement Manager), Augusto Gonzalez-Ruiz (Code Enforcement Officer), Michael Folger (Code Enforcement Officer), Debra Babb-Nutcher (City Attorney), Darla Crowl (Recording Secretary)
Named on at least one ballot later in the meeting: Brown (participation, which can differ from the roll: arrivals and departures are in the minutes' text)
Adopted actions (12)
to approve to the agenda of November16, 2023 (moved by Davis, seconded by Hughes); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
to approve to the minutes of October 19, 2023 (moved by Davis, seconded by Brown); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
to approve Staffs recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Brown, seconded by Scott); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Scott, seconded by Otero); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 4
to approve Staffs recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Davis, seconded by Scott); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 4
to amend Staff's recommendation and give them (60 days) January 16, 2024 and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Davis, seconded by Simpson); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 5
to amend Staffs recommendation and give (60 days) January 18, 2024 and a fine of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) per day and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Davis, seconded by Scott); CARRIED 6-1 (result not printed; worked out from the count); ayes: not named in the minutes; nays: Brown — the City's minutes, p. 6 Corrected to match the minutes, page 5.
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Brown, seconded by Davis); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 7
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Davis, seconded by Hughes); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 7
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Simpson, seconded by Brown); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 7
to approve staff's recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of three thousand seven hundred fifty- six dollars and thirty-seven cents ($3,756.37) (moved by Otero, seconded by Hughes); CARRIED 5-2 — the City's minutes, p. 10
to not have a meeting in December (moved by Roberts, seconded by Davis); CARRIED 5-2 — the City's minutes, p. 11
Money named in the minutes' motions (what each motion did with the amount, in its own words)
$3,756.37 — Code Enforcement: recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “approve staff's recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of three thousand seven hundred fifty- six dollars and thirty-seven cents ($3,756.37)” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (260_CE_Reg_Minutes_11_16_2023.pdf, p. 10); fiscal period not recorded)
$250.00 — Code Enforcement: named in a motion for which no result was read. “amend Staffs recommendation and give (60 days) January 18, 2024 and a fine of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) per day and find the Property Owner in violation” (motion result: none read; the City's minutes (260_CE_Reg_Minutes_11_16_2023.pdf, p. 6); fiscal period not recorded)
Agenda (the City's wording)
The City's agenda for this meeting is on file (CE_Reg_Agenda_11_16_2023), but its item list has not been read reliably by machine yet, so no outline is shown.
Transcript Partial transcript
Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have
not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard.
It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's
minutes do that (above).
A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. No recording can be started from here.
486 suspect passage(s) marked in place; inspection incomplete: language review; 2 stretch(es) where a voice was detected and no words were recognized.
How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 18 voices separated from the audio.
51 short machine repair(s) (65 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one.
Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs and whether a voice was detected where the words are. Not completed: language review.
A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 89.9% of 20,898 content words.
Dotted words (526 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading.
486 passages (25% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there.
Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Inspection is incomplete: language review.
Voice detected, no words recognized (2 stretches). Something may have been said here that the transcript does not have:
00:00:31 (17 s) — neither reading has words
00:23:41 (1 s) — neither reading has words
Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:47–00:01:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:35–00:02:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:29–00:02:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:02:43–00:02:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
You all right? And I'd like to welcome Mr. Otero as a regular member of the board. Thank you, sir. Thank you. Yeah. Congratulations. And I'd like to welcome
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:03:31–00:03:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:03:35–00:03:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:03:38–00:03:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:51–00:03:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:55]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[00:03:56]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
property address is 412 Prospect Avenue. For the record, I'm Augusto Gonzalez, code enforcement officer. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos actually depict the property during my visits and show my findings of exterior general condition. Section
[00:04:12]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:11–00:04:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:16]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
disrepair of the roof and the fascia. Permit required, Appendix A, Article 15, Section 2A for the unpermitted roof repair, which was started but never finished and currently has an expired and closed
[00:04:27]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:27–00:04:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:30]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I
[00:04:31]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:30–00:04:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:34]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
violation of the above-mentioned sections of the city code. I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last
[00:04:41]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:40–00:04:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:44]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the property remains in violation.
[00:04:46]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
I've
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:46–00:04:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:04:47]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
been working
[00:04:47]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:47–00:04:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:51]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
contact with a property owner. I
[00:04:53]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:53–00:04:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:57]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
I've
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:57–00:04:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:04:57]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
brought this case
[00:04:58]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:58–00:04:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:59]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
have been working this case for 429 days, and the
[00:05:03]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:03–00:05:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:05]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I sent the notice
[00:05:06]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:06–00:05:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:09]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
posted on the property in violation. Due to the longevity of this case and no progress made, staff finds in case 22-629 that the owner is in violation and recommend 30 days be given to come in compliance, or a fine of $25 for exterior donor condition and $50 for payment required. be imposed for each of the violations remain until compliance is achieved. and the property owner is not present.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:41–00:06:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:09–00:06:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:24–00:06:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:24–00:06:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:28]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:06:31]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos actually
[00:06:36]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
depict
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:06:36–00:06:36 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:06:36]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the property during my visits and show my findings of storing outdoors, section 6-900 b11 for the outdoor storage items in and around the carport. storagestoring junkerado
[00:06:48]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:06:47–00:06:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:48]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
6-902 B1 and 2 for the storage of an inoperable and or unregistered vehicle. Weed section 6-1001d for the overgrowth on the property exceeding 12 inches in height. I
[00:07:01]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:59–00:07:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:04]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
violation of the above mentioned sections of the city ‸ code. I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as my last inspection this
[00:07:11]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:11–00:07:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:15]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I've been working this case since
[00:07:17]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:17–00:07:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:23]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
owner having several medical issues. Several extensions were provided, including the final 30-day extension provided in October of 2023. I
[00:07:32]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:31–00:07:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:35]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
for 415 days. The violation has not been fully resolved. I sent the notice of hearing on on November 2nd, 2023, and it was sent certified and posted on the property in violation. Due to the longevity of this case and no progress made, staff finds in case 22-687 that the owner is in violation and recommend three
[00:07:54]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:54–00:07:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:54]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
be given to come in compliance or a fine of 25
[00:07:57]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:57–00:08:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:04]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
of the violations remain until compliance is achieved. The property owner is present.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:11–00:08:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:12]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:08:19–00:08:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:08:29–00:08:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:38–00:08:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
under the garage. There's nothing sitting out around it, nowhere. The only thing setting out is my motorcycle and it's covered. So if he goes by in the morning, I guarantee you that ain't
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:08:59–00:09:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:09–00:09:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:29–00:09:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in that, nothing in that yard. I assure you. So whatever y'all do to me for having it there, I guess I got to deal with, but I'm sorry. Well, sir, it's not about
Can you hear me now? Yes, sir. Okay. All right. So you have three violations, one for storing outdoors, storing junk and autos, and one for weeds. You said everything is cleared up. Yes,
Okay. So 30 days is, well, you said it's cleaned up. So the only thing you would have to do now is get ‸ with Mr. Bunk and everyone else to find out when would they be able to come out to check it out and see what can be taken off.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:11:31–00:11:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:43–00:11:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:51–00:12:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:10–00:12:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:31–00:12:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:38–00:12:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:51]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
right. So the property address is 1310 Jackson street. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos actually depict the property during my visits and show my findings of temporary storage. Appendix a article 13 section 30 a3
[00:13:06]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:06–00:13:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:07]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the unpermitted comics container on the property storage of recreational vehicles. Appendix
[00:13:12]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:11–00:13:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:16]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
vehicle exceeding 22 feet. And stored in a housekeeping state. And is on a vacant residential lot with no primary structure. I visited
[00:13:24]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:24–00:13:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:27]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
property in violation of the above mentioned sections of the city code. i have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case. That is my last inspection on November 16, 2023. The property remains in violation. i've been working this case since September 27, 2022, and have had contact with a property owner. I've brought this case
[00:13:45]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:44–00:13:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:49]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
violations have not been fully resolved. I sent the notice
[00:13:51]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:51–00:13:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:54]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and it was sent certified and posted on the property ‸ violation. Due ‸ longevity of this case and no progress made, staff finds in case 22-691. that the owners of violation, and recommend 30 days be given to come into compliance or a fine of 25
[00:14:08]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:07–00:14:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:12]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
imposed. for
[00:14:13]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:12–00:14:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:14]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I moved my camper. I mean, i I mean, my lot is 187 feet long and 107 feet deep, and then I owned 250 feet behind that, and I had it parked on there, and iI didn't think there was anything wrong with it, but I guess it is. I mean, I've got tags and insurance on it, so I moved it today, ‸ sir. The only thing I have left is the ‸ connex, and I have it halfway empty, and that connex is, I've
in it for the last 20 years, or so it's hard to get it all out, sir, but I will have it out in another few days, sir, and it will, I've already got it gone. It's already been sold. The gentleman's just waiting on me to get the stuff out of it.
Yes, sir. Well, the same thing goes. Those gentlemen right there, your best friend, um you get with them. They can come out there um probably tomorrow, so if you get with them. Okay, sir. All right. Yes, sir. So, I mean, other than that, you still have 30 days, but if you get out there tomorrow, you'll see what progress you've made, and they can guide you from there.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:40–00:15:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:45–00:15:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:01–00:16:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:16:12–00:16:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
enforcement officer I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits and show my findings of permit required, Appendix A, Article 15, Section 2A for the carport canopy that was installed with no permit, storing junker autos for vehicles stored on the property in various states of disrepair storing outdoors chapter 6
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:13–00:17:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:15–00:17:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:17–00:17:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:27–00:17:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:29–00:17:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:15–00:18:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and no progress being made, staff finds in case number 23694 that the owner is in violation and recommends 30 days be given to come into compliance or a fine of $25 for the permit required, $25 for storing junk or auto, and $25 for storing outdoors, $25 for accumulation of trash and litter, and $25 for business tax receipt be imposed for each day. The violations remain until compliance is achieved.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:55–00:19:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:13–00:19:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
and this has happened to me two or three times in the past two years I get like one letter and I try to talk to somebody can't find them can't get nothing and the case is just gone so with him I got the first one I got one letter and then I got the notice of the hearing on my mailbox and that was it Anyway, the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:20:11–00:20:11 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:12–00:20:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:35–00:20:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
them every day as far as anything else that is the corner of my house that was like that a little bit ‸ but it hasn't been like that in months I see people code enforcement I saw three of them drive by two days ago and just right past me I I
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:10–00:21:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:18–00:21:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
For a canopy like this, it depends on what she comes with for the application. She'll have to fill out an application. Because she did her own straps and anchors, she's going to have to have some sort of engineering to show how it's anchored in the ground, that it would meet 220 mile an hour wind loads, um 30,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:46–00:22:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:42–00:24:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:24:43–00:24:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
were other cars there ‸ when I started the case. Okay. Okay. There was a car on the right side of the canopy. There was one this morning by Mercedes, I believe it was. Okay.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:04–00:25:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
No, that's not actually written in the building code. That would be up to a building official and it refers to small ‸ canvas type canopies. If you can take them down within 24 hours, a lot of times they'll call it a temporary structure and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:25:35–00:25:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
is not designed to be a temporary structure. It's ‸ designed to be permanent. And if it was temporary, she'd only be able to have it for 120 days and she'd
just like a shed and he said, and it's, it's for the strapping of what's in the ground. So like when you get a shed, you have to have it anchored so that it will withstand 220 mile an hour winds means the winds not going to blow the shed down, you know, like across your yard. So it's the tie downs that require the wind load. So
That's what she has to show. She's got, says she's got pictures of the footers and the anchors and how they strapped it down. That's what the building official wants to see.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:36–00:26:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:42–00:26:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:45–00:26:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:22–00:27:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:27:38–00:27:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
has usually has metal and other items leaning on it. As you can see in some of these other pictures, see, they have like pipes and that's what led to the business being run out of there. The fact that there was a box truck.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:31–00:28:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:42–00:28:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:28:48–00:28:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:29:27–00:29:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:29:59–00:30:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
‸ There's no business. And, but that's for them to do more investigation. She said it's not, uh, they said it possibly is due to those items that are there. So as to right now, it's still here and that's what they believe until it's proven otherwise.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:40–00:30:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
or you're going to make these products at your house. As long as it meets the zoning requirement, you fill out an application, you pay $74. They give you a business tax receipt. Well,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:37–00:31:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So we don't want to convolute it. If you decide to do something, just same place you get the permit, just apply for a business tax receipt. That's simple. That's over the counter. You can have it done in a day.
Okay, well, it doesn't have to make money if you're generating a business and you're having product and stuff at your house. That's what the business tax. It's a simple process, but if you're not doing it, don't get one. But you ‸ know, that's all I'm letting you know. If you start to run a business of any kind, just go get a business tax receipt. It's
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:22–00:32:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:34–00:32:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
they presented it to them. So they commissioned me to make some samples for them and to help them set up their warehouse. And then they asked me to manage it and I couldn't do that because I can't drive all the way to Disney Springs with a little girl.
her testimony. She did in the past, but she's not now. So that's why I said, if you decide to later, go get a business tax receipt. As of ‸ now, we're going to go with what the chairman stated and we're concentrating on the permit.
So basically what I was trying to get to was I also weld. I also used to race cars. We do a lot of stuff. We play. So there's a lot of wood. There's a lot of, I mean, I grew up, I grew up, my mom owned a craft store and my dad was an engineer. So we play, I got welders.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:33:32–00:33:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you to have this property taken care of. We're not trying to tell you what to do or how to run it with anything, but we're just trying to ensure that you're following the code. So now then you're out of here.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:34:11–00:34:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:34:23–00:34:24 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:27–00:34:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:09–00:35:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:35:11–00:35:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:19–00:35:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:39–00:35:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:36:05–00:36:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:50–00:36:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Opposed? ‸ Motion passes. All right, ma'am. So like I said, um, you need to get with these gentlemen. Um, you hit, you see them now, so please get with them to ensure that you're in constant communication to help you with less headaches, um, going forward to get yourself in the right direction.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:35–00:37:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:41–00:37:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:37:44–00:37:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits and show findings of, uh, tree protection and preservation. Appendix a article 13 section 22 E one through four for the removal of an oak tree from the city right away. I visited the site four times during my first inspection.
found the property in violation of the above mentioned sections of the city code. I've attempted to gain voluntary compliance ‸ in this case, but as my last inspection November 16th, 2023, the property remains in violation. I've been working this case since July 19th, 2023, and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:38:24–00:38:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
had some contact with the property owner. I brought this case before the code board as I've been working this case for 120 days and the violations have not been resolved. I sent notice of hearing on November 3rd, 2023, and it was sent certified and post on the property in violation. Due
The tree was removed. We got a complaint from public works and planning and zoning. Um, as you can see in the front here where they were grinding the stump of the tree down, they cut the city's oak tree and then they ground the stump out. So
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:41–00:39:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:54–00:39:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:14–00:40:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, the tree was destroying my property, sir. Um, they replaced the sidewalk three different times. I paid $10,000 to have pavers put in my front yard. It was literally lifting up the pavers, destroying everything. My kids have tripped multiple times on the sidewalk. Um, I
The neighbor next to that don't have a tree. Um, I did cut the tree down, however. So ‸ I am responsible for cutting the tree down. But like I said, my kids have fallen multiple times from the sidewalks being like this from the roots. I don't know why. Yeah, it's a beautiful tree, but why do you plant a tree in a three foot easement? A big oak tree. And it wasn't nearly big as any of those trees there either. I mean, it was half the size of the tree you see right now in the picture.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:41:46–00:41:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:10–00:42:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:30–00:42:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:42:38–00:42:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:42:47–00:42:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:57–00:42:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:43:14–00:43:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:43:19–00:43:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I needed to go down to the city and apply for a after the fact permit. So that's what I did. I went to the city and I said, I'm applying for an after the fact permit. Now they couldn't figure out what kind of permit.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:59–00:44:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:09–00:44:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:18–00:44:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:44:42–00:44:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:43–00:44:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:57–00:45:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:03–00:45:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:19–00:45:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you don't have a reason. I'm just telling you what the code is. So that's the whole paper issue. In the process of doing that, he cut down a tree in the city right away, which was a city tree.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:33–00:45:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:45:45–00:45:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
And because he cut down a tree, the tree was already cut down. There's no way to measure it. There's no way to look at it and it's not his tree. It's on city property. So then public works came back and said, they cut down our tree and we can't have it back. So based on the new penalty system in the tree section, that's an irreversible, irreparable violation. And that's what we cited them for.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:46:31–00:46:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:46–00:46:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And we were talking about, you know, diameters and stuff like that. They've recently upgraded the ordinance and simplified the penalty stage, making this an irreversible, irreparable violation for removing. So we don't necessarily have to look at the caliper of the tree and the size of the tree. The fact is there is no tree. The tree's gone. It can't be put back the way it was. It's irreversible, irreparable.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:17–00:47:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:23–00:47:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
ago was still irreversible repairable because the tree was already cut down and removed. Okay. What we did though is we asked him to get with planning and zoning and get with public works and try to remedy this situation so that code wouldn't have to cite them. Okay.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:47:58–00:48:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So there has been no mitigation of, Hey, give us a tree for the, none of that happened. So therefore we had to step in and then we cited it, but either way, it was irreversible ‸ repairable from the moment he cut the tree and ground the stump into the ground. Okay. And it's
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:48:45–00:48:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I've been to the one here. I've been upstairs for the third or the second floor. I've been all over. I've done everything. I've ‸ emailed and talked to Mr. Augustus multiple times trying to, to, to fix this problem.
and say that I have not done nothing. I have, I have emailed, I have gone, I've talked to people. Nobody knows how to fix the problem. So now here I am. Now I'm going to get hit with another $5,000 fine that I really can't pay. Okay. I went to, to, to public works. I went upstairs. I tried to pull the permits. They told me that the permit was pulled and everything was fine. Then it went away. I
And I said, well, I thought it was all done. So he told me to go back. So I went back upstairs to the second floor again and said, what is going on? The lady said, well, so-and-so is not working here no more. So now I'm in charge of this. So
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:50:40–00:50:41 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
discussion, please. Mr. Von. On these trees. Say there's a big tree there. ‸ All of a sudden it's growing into his property. It's pushing the sidewalk up. The tree overhanging the property makes a mess on it. It kills the grass.
I mean. Again, there's procedures to that. So what you would do is not run out and cut the tree down. You would go to public works because it's their tree. And you would speak to public works. And public works could replace the sidewalk. They could cut the roots out. They could do whatever. That's the biggest problem here is that tree is not his tree. He walked
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:51:25–00:51:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the city right away and he cut down the tree. If that was on my property, I'd go to public works and make public works, trim the branches, do whatever they need to do.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:35–00:51:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:41–00:51:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I don't think you were here at the time, but right here in the village, the trees that were really close to the street and the sidewalk were growing into the buildings and all. We had a heck of a time with figuring all that out. Right down there in Delanoi, up towards going south, they were a problem. So
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:35–00:52:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:42–00:52:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:52:49–00:52:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
What I'm saying is when he had these problems in the beginning and the sidewalk ‸ lifted, you go there. That's what the tree ordinance is about. If you want to cut the tree down, you go there. You have the public works arbors go look at it. They issue a permit. You can cut the tree down, trim branches, do whatever. This is not the first time we brought this to the board. Like I said, we had a case on Tulane back in 2017 where a lady did the same thing. She didn't even cut the tree completely down. We also had Swanee where the gentleman cut the trees and we brought that before this board. So this is not new. And I don't want to see the guy get punished either if the thing is messing up his yard, but there's a procedure that needs to be done. You
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:09–00:54:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, that part is a mess. But again, if we didn't put the cart before the horse and we followed regular procedures, we wouldn't necessarily be in this predicament.
With the remedy in reference, because it's coming before us now, he was supposed to get with public works in reference to how to remedy it, correct? Correct. Because, yes, can't
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:03–00:55:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
right. So it's been going, ‸ been doing all this time. So I don't see why we couldn't give him a little more time to find out who he would need to go to, to see what he could do to help remedy this in reference to, because, you know, us
Yes. It's my understanding that the city has a tree bank and had public, and he went to public works and said, look, the tree looked this big. The arborist looked at their aerials and came up with a diameter and said, look, you provide us X number of trees in lieu of this. We'll take them. Or sometimes you can do a cash mitigation. That's the way I read in the ordinance that it can be done.
And so that's what they should do. They should say, you can either donate this many inches of tree to the tree bank, or you can donate financially this much money to the tree bank.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:29–00:56:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:35–00:56:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:39–00:56:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
got charged 2,500 per tree instead of the 5,000, but she didn't cut the trees all the way down. Um, so there's circumstances. So yes, he could probably mitigate this through the tree bank. I would imagine and get back the inches that were removed so that they could plant trees. Somewhere else. Um, I don't know if they'd be planning in the front of his house. You know, from a personal standpoint, I agree that the oak trees on throughout the city on
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:57:25–00:57:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:44–00:57:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:01–00:58:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
know, you use the tree canopy to estimate what was gone versus what was there now. And I'm just curious why that same methodology wouldn't be appropriate in this case. Well, because the same
attorney that was present then, Kristen Ike, that's ‸ the way the ordinance was written then. But now to streamline it because it's hard to do aerials and calculate, they kind of made it more simple and they did it per tree per acre per this and they did it all at $5,000 per tree. Now the irreversible part has always been in effect. That's not new. That's been around forever. But they did modify that. After that case to make it a little easier ‸ to calculate, because if you remember,
were going back and forth on the price of the permit versus the price of all the inches versus this. And it was kind of convoluted. So they streamlined it and basically said, just like everything irreversible, repairable. Now, if we cut down five trees, we would have an irreversible at 5,000 per tree. And they took away the inches. That was one of the cases that actually started. And it was ‸ also another subdivision from what I understand.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:43–00:59:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
permit, which they ended up getting the permit. But in order to get the permit, they had to pay into the tree bank, also plant trees on the property. And then the permit was issued. And they actually did that at the very, very end of the situation. So they actually ended up still paying off the top of my head. I
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:08–01:00:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that he's willing to do it real ‸ quick. So what I'm saying is if we use that case as a precedent and we allow him a 30 day period with a tree mitigation plan or a fine of $250 a day, that'll give him an opportunity to hop on it real quick and avoid the fines. You know, but
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:35–01:00:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:44–01:01:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:06–01:02:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that's built to the lady upstairs in the second floor of the permitting department. I'm very familiar with pulling permits. I pull them all the time. So I went to the permitting department and I said, okay, I need to pull a permit for this tree and these pavers. This gentleman told me it was going to be two different permits. So I very much told them it's two permits, one for a tree. That was an after the fact one for pavers. That's an after the fact. She said, okay. Another lady came from the side, spoke to me for a minute. She was a Hispanic lady. She said, okay, I'm gonna take down your information and we'll get back with you. Then I called back and I spoke to how they
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:54–01:02:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that both permits were on the same permit. ‸ And I didn't understand that. I said, no, this is supposed to be two permits. She said, no, we just put them all on the same permit. Okay. So then now, now, now I'm under the impression that the permits are pulled, that we're done with the situation. So I went in, I think submitted my drawings for the pavers. I went and pulled up all my pavers filed for the, for the finish of the permit. They came out, did their inspection is done. I didn't think nothing else of it. Then ‸ we're getting a letter several months later saying that this case has not been followed through with, there was never a permit for the tree. This whole time. I'm
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:42–01:03:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:03:49–01:03:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:54–01:03:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:04:06–01:04:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
after the fact. The permit for cutting down trees is done prior to, you can't cut down a bunch of trees and then necessarily get an after the fact. So that's where all the hubbub came. And then, like I said, then they sat down and they revised the ordinance and the penalty phase. Nope.
to pull permits so I could finish the grinding of the stump because I didn't know that I wasn't supposed to do that. So I stopped. I returned the machine went and did what I had to do and then when I was told that I was okay I went and finished the stump. So I didn't like
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:15–01:05:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:31–01:05:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:05:46–01:05:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
this? Because that would give him the time to speak with whoever needs it needs to go to as far as trying to get some clarification because it seems like there's a lot of uh cloudy water in this case.
as Mr. Davis was mentioning um then it would already be set. Um of course staff would prefer that but we'll go either way. Our goal is compliance. Our goal is not to
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:29–01:06:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Our goal is to get him into the right place where he can negotiate that with public works andand make the city whole for taking away the tree that was on the city right away. So that's where we stand.
to clarify I think that the burden has been met here as far as proof um he's admitted to taking down the tree. So I think we just need to at this point decide what the board feels is appropriate as a remedy. Um no one here believes that he didn't ‸ cut down the tree because he's admitted to it. We know that that was wrong. So we need to decide what the appropriate punishment is going to be that we're going to impose. I don't see why we would need to wait. Um
I just need to make sure that our Cocoa homeowner is very clear on the understanding they are not looking for you to get a permit. They're looking for you. That's
There's a big big difference ‸ based on just hold on, based on sitting here listening to everything that you've said, everything that he said, the attorney and everybody on this board. I feel like you have really gone above and beyond trying to get a permit. But please understand where they are at is looking for remedy. I understand. So you've got to get with public works to remedy the situation. Absolutely. You
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:08:25–01:08:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:08:31–01:08:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I feel like it's not clear over the fact that you you need to put the permit out of your mind and you need to talk about remedy. That's fine. So when you go to public works in the morning you need to talk to them about remedy the situation. All the ‸ other filler information let it go. You need to talk about remedy. Y'all can y'all can do whatever you want with the finding thing but I'm I'm I feel like he's also the the the officers have gone above and beyond to prove their their side and I feel like he's kind of gone above and beyond also. So I'm kind of straddling this one. I'm I'm I don't
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:13–01:09:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:16–01:09:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that will give him the 30 day period to do the tree mitigation just like she's saying the remedy. Okay. So if you can get that done within 30 days you can get off with no fine.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:09:47–01:09:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:26–01:10:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the machine readings disagree here · 01:11:01–01:11:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:03–01:11:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
again I have no problem I'll meet him tomorrow morning and do whatever they say I have to do on my end there's no problem but I'm telling I've been going through this with the city for a long time, trying to fix this problem. Not with just a permit, trying to fix it in general period to get it behind me I have told them I would do whatever you guys want me to do
should be and that's what I'm saying if he gets with me I'll set up an appointment with Abigail and we'll sit down together all of us and then that way becauseyou know you get the answers to the questions that you ask. So if you go up and you ask somebody questions and you're not asking right, you get those answers. And sometimes communication gets scattered so if he wants to meet with me Monday I'll be more than happy to you know translate between public works and we'll get it done.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:42–01:12:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:52–01:13:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:13:09–01:13:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:14–01:13:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:21–01:13:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:13:45–01:13:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:14:02–01:14:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
have to vote for it if you don't agree with it but I think the city council passed this to these changes because they want us to know how ‸ important the trees in the city are. and I think we have to respect that
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:14:24–01:14:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:14:39–01:14:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:43–01:14:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:14:53–01:15:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:15:10–01:15:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:15:56–01:15:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:26–01:16:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:16:31]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the address is 213 factory street I'm submitting photos that took your my re-inspections of the property. They actually depict the property during my visits. This case is brought to the Code Board on April
[01:16:44]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:43–01:16:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:16:47]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
of site plan approval required appendix a article 13 section 1b for the alterations made to the property without a site plan. The property owner was given two separate board orders to comply the first board order
[01:17:01]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:17:01–01:17:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:17:05]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the
[01:17:05]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
millings
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:17:05–01:17:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:17:05]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
from the property this case
[01:17:07]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
was
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:17:07–01:17:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:17:07]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
brought to the
[01:17:08]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:17:08–01:17:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:17:11]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and was tabled by the board. The
[01:17:13]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:12–01:17:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:17:17]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
on this same date former code member David Lightholder also provided the
[01:17:21]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:21–01:17:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:17:24]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:23–01:17:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:17:30]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:29–01:17:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:17:37]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
board the second board order compliance date with October 20th 2023 and was to obtain a site plan approval for the alteration made to the site, changing the property used from a federal consent decree, low density, single family, and multiple family to a parking lot. The fine amount for this board order was set at $50 per day I sent the notice of hearing for non-compliance on November 2nd 2023 and it was ‸ certified and posted. At this time, the only progress made has been some removal of millings to the outskirts
[01:18:09]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:18:08–01:18:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:18:12]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the
[01:18:12]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:12–01:18:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:18:16]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
property remains in violation, and the property owner former property owner is here
they sat with the mayor and there was a big meeting about it and is this that I
[01:18:32]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
think
[01:18:32]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:32–01:18:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:18:35]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
believe it was planning and zoning or the city manager okay
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:18:52–01:18:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:18:59–01:19:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
all right sir okay as you spoke as you noted we have had several meetings on this and I've made a lot of progress I think I gave I was to a written update on what I had done so I
one of the things I had to do that we discussed with Mr. Bunt was that I had to merge the problem title merge the property to my apartment building which is right there in the picture of the yellow building so that's been done so I have uh
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:20:04–01:20:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um so we had a pre-application meeting I think you call it for the permit uh with Bowman associates that was done uh we've gone to construction drawings now uh I
he said that the project drawings uh ‸ construction drawings will be done by the end of the month and then we'll submit for the formal permit but we have had a formal pre-permit application meeting with the city so there's been a lot of progress um and like I said I think
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:20:46–01:20:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:20:48–01:20:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
city told me it was a parking lot and I could use it for the same thing which we don't need to go over all that again but I've made a lot of progress spent a lot of money and uh I guess ‸ all I can do is wait
submitted from the property appraiser that he put an application to adjoin the properties. It didn't say it was already done. So we don't have that. um This is also a non-compliance hearing. um And he has not even applied for the site plan yet because he needs his drawings and everything to go with it. So has he made some
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:21:51–01:21:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And even if he submits for the site plan, they may not okay it as a parking lot based that it's in a consent decree. So we we have not advanced as much as what's there. But at the end of the day, it's still in non-compliance. um We did discuss the millings in detail what needed to be done with the millings. That's why there was a separate order done. When it came back, it was said that the millings would make a good base for his parking lot when he gets ready to do it. That's why he didn't scrape all that. But he had to find an engineer. An engineer was given to him. um I
is where I am. He might have another six months with the way things go to do that. But we've we've had this case open. um You know, the hearing for this the first time was in April and then we
I just wanted to mention that it is a non-compliance hearing. And right now we do not have a site plan and we still have millings. And I mean, this picture is from this morning. You can see where the apron is and I'm not going to rehash the parking lot issue because it
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:22–01:23:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay, well, I i go back to your first statement The county the county has approved it. It is the title is merged now. It's it's listed as 699. hewlettthere has been
so. Well, I think it has, but that's a matter of fact. That's fine. But the pro the thing that worries me what you say now is at this last meeting, you know, I I was instructed what I had to do. I
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:24–01:24:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:26–01:24:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:28–01:24:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
was stated, let me let me clarify, okay because I'm pretty standard the whole way across. You can't just make a parking lot in the consent decree. So, it was brought up that you would need to join them together to make it one property to have a parking lot. It still doesn't mean you're going to be allowed to. That was always discussed. You only cited to get a site plan. Based on your testimony, it
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:25:16–01:25:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:15–01:26:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
instructed to ‸ here. I'm not saying it's in compliance. yet I agree with it, but I'm, I have a path and I'm doing what I have to do. It just takes a lot of time.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:39–01:26:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you very much. I'll take a motion. But I need, well, I need to know from, I need to get an inspection. I guess ‸ if I've got to continue to scrape and sweep, obviously I can't get every little piece of milling, but I'm
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:07–01:27:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:17–01:27:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:25–01:27:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:33–01:27:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
go out there and discuss whatever. But at this juncture, I think he needs to go through the site plan approval, get approved, and then put the parking lot in if he's approved the way it should be done. But at this juncture, he's still in non-compliance and he's always been worried about time. But if we make a motion here today, then there is no more clock. Mr.
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:07–01:28:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:42–01:28:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
just go ahead and follow through with everything you're supposed to do. ‸ Get your site plan approved. Get all that. When you do, we'll comply the case, and then you can come back to the board on a lien reduction based on what has a call What
then And then because the millings are still there and it's still designed that way, you get that fine. But don't worry about the fine. You can always come back. Now you need to concentrate on getting your site plan approval push through and okay with planning and zoning and go from there. Just
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:29:29–01:29:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:30:21–01:30:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:40–01:30:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:44–01:30:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
during testimony, it was brought up that he put down the millings and put installed the gate and did the parking lot that way. And we started to discuss that he could close the case. If he just restored the property to the way it was, he didn't want to do that. And he kept talking about joining the property. So ‸ the board said, well, look, we'll tell you this, remove the millings and restore the property. And that, and you have this length of time to do that. And this would be your fine. And then you need to get your site plan. We're going to give you 180 days to go get your site plan. So the board divided our case in to
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:31:28–01:31:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:31:35–01:31:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:31:44–01:31:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:31:48–01:31:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:32:12–01:32:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:32:43–01:32:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, once again, you're gonna ‸ have to get with Mr. Bunk on Monday. And then you guys can talk about that and get whoever he needs to get there or whoever you need to get there. But ‸ at this time you even admit it you're in non-compliant.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:33:36–01:33:36 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:37–01:33:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:50–01:33:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:57–01:34:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:34:10–01:34:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:10–01:34:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:34:15]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[01:34:19]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
took through my re-inspections of the property. They accurately depict the property during my visits. This case is brought to the code board on September 21st, 2023.
[01:34:26]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:26–01:34:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:34:28]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
exterior general condition section 6-1003
[01:34:31]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:13]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:30–01:34:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:34:44]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
done to the property. roof
[01:34:46]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:17]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:44–01:35:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:35:03]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
property owner has a road permit issued an
[01:35:05]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:35:05–01:35:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:35:05]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
permit and review status, but the property remains in violation. and‸ property owner is not present
the ceiling has been falling in and they've been just kind of painting over it and putting up different tape and trying to paint over it because the roof actually leaks into the building. And that's another picture of the same.
Yes. This is the overhangs. The wood on these overhangs are rotten. You can see here where this balcony ‸ starting to erode and decay. And then this is what the exterior of the building looks like with mold and mildew um all the way down the sides. And then here you got some rotted wood at the overhang. And then this is runs along the whole top of the building, the mold and mildew.
have one permit that's been issued, sir. The other one's under review. One's for electrical. And then the roof has been actually issued. So hopefully they will fix the roof.
[01:36:19]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I do have contact with the owner. He's aware of the status and what's going on and he's going to keep work on everything. And when he's ready to come in for production
[01:36:25]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:36:25–01:36:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:35–01:36:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:58–01:37:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:37:01]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[01:37:06]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
took through my reinfections
[01:37:08]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:37:07–01:37:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:37:08]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the property. They accurately depict the property during my visits. This case is brought to the code board on September 21st, 2023
[01:37:14]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:14–01:37:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:37:16]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the exterior general condition. Section 6-1003
[01:37:19]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:37:18–01:37:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:37:23]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
of the roof protective treatment and exterior structure. The board order compliance date was October 21st, 2023. I sent the notice of hearing for non-compliance on November 2nd, 2023 and it was sent certified and posted. I have not had contact with the property owner and at this time the property remains in violation. The
[01:37:40]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:39–01:37:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:37:52]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
That
[01:37:53]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:52–01:37:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:22–01:38:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:38:25–01:38:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:51–01:39:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:38:56]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[01:39:00]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Lane. the
[01:39:02]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:39:01–01:39:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:39:07]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
found the
[01:39:07]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:07–01:39:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:39:10]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
following. Exterior general conditions. ‸ Section 6-1003A. Maintenance of the interior structure. Section 6-1004A. Pools and spas. Section 6-1002A. Accessory structure Section 6-1001G. Weeds. Section 6-1001D. Failure
[01:39:30]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:29–01:39:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:39:38]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Premises identification. Section 6-1009C. Wrongful disposal of exterment
[01:39:44]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:39:43–01:39:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:39:45]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
1. Section 22-4. The
[01:39:47]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:39:47–01:39:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:39:52]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
with the Code Enforcement Board's order, a non-compliance hearing
[01:39:54]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:54–01:39:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:39:56]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:55–01:40:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:40:01]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
until compliance was achieved. On August 10th
[01:40:04]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:40:04–01:40:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:40:05]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Code
[01:40:06]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:40:05–01:40:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:40:12]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
case was closed, leaving
[01:40:14]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:40:14–01:40:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:40:14]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
fine of 52 660 The
[01:40:18]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:40:17–01:40:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:40:28]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
making recommendation its
[01:40:29]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:40:29–01:40:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:40:34]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the time the violations occurred, no. If the applicant resides ‸ the property,
[01:40:49]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
property taxes the
[01:40:50]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:40:50–01:40:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:40:54]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
year. The taxes were paid on October 16, 2023, and no amounts are owed at this time. Other liens records
[01:41:02]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
show
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:41:02–01:41:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:41:02]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
no outstanding liens in the property, no water liens. Property inspection this property was inspected this morning, November 16, 2023, and was in compliance before the Code Board hearing. An inspection will also occur prior to the Council meeting. The
[01:41:17]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:41:15–01:41:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:41:26]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
a single family residence. The property was cited with a home, and staff submits their cost sheet in the total
[01:41:33]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:41:32–01:41:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:41:41]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
right,
[01:41:41]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:41:41–01:41:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:41:42]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:41:46–01:41:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:41:52–01:41:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You have the floor. Thank you. uh Yeah, I was here 30 days ago, and I was grateful to be here because I got to listen to other homeowners who are dealing with the same lien reductions. And I noticed all of them said, you know, I didn't know, my property manager didn't tell me, and that type of, uh I'm not gonna ‸ say excuses, but those type of statements. In my case, I've been aware of these things the entire time since about this property, since day one. So what happened on my end is that I bought the property on October 30th, and my first contact with the officer, Katie Craver was November 19th. I
have proofof every of every single contact, of every text message, of every photo, of every permit. So if you, at any moment, you want proof, I can provide that now. um After meeting with them, I asked for a walkthrough so they can, I was, let me, let me back up. The day of closing, I knew of the violations, and I bought the property regardless. So
bought it, I set up the time on November 19th to meet with the officer to walk the property so I can then clean out whatever needed to be cleaned out and bring the property back to compliance. um I met with the officer. We walked through the entire property, um
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:39–01:43:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
never ended. So finally, um well, let me, let me, let me, let me say this. So that was November 19th. My first meeting, according to the paperwork that I have, the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:43:54–01:44:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:15–01:44:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I want to let you know that I have text messages. I have permits that were pulled during that entire time. So how was, how is it possible that I had no idea that there was a lead running yet? I've been talking 100 with code enforcement all the time, building department, pulling permits, doing all. But yeah, I have no idea. Now I have a, um I think I have an idea what happened. I have a, which I pulled from public record, a letter that was sent to the previous owner while the property was mine on December 19th. I have here the letter that was sent. It was a notice letting them know that there was going to be a lien imposed on the property, but I
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:45:10–01:45:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the lien. I didn't know about the lien, but they were mailing the previous owner. When I found out, I found out maybe a month before the, the,‸ lien stopped at that point. The
beautiful as you can see. um but by then I, when I, I got a letter in the mail, I don't remember how exactly I found out, but immediately I called court enforcement. Isaid Hey, what's going on? Why do I have this fine for 52
said, okay, well, let's meet at the property. We did our inspection and they stopped the lien. And ever since then, after that, i mean trying to get into this
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:46:16–01:46:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:46:20–01:46:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
So that's why I request that it should be zero because it wasn't i was ignoring it. It wasn't that it wasn't present. It wasn't that my property manager, manager didn't tell me. I've been aware of this. I've been meeting with the city manager. I've been meeting with, uh talking with Mr.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:47:04–01:47:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
knew about these violations, but they were just violations. So ‸ I bought the property anyways. I told title to let's go ahead and close and i that I was going to take care of those violations once I bought it. Does that
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:47:20–01:47:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
done. And after that was just a nightmare because it required more meetings and more walkthroughs ‸ every time they added more to the list and it never ended. And here I am three years later.
of time and there's a lot to it. And some of it pertains to the actual violations and corrections and then other things pertain to him getting here for a
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:03–01:48:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the property. So between the, before the non-compliance hearing. But after the first hearing, he purchased it. miss Carver submitted the notice of violation to the new owner. And he was actually the person noticed to come to the non-compliance hearing. um because he took ownership of the property. Once he took ownership, he began working. And what he's referring to is he had to get window permits to replace those windows that were smashed out. He
That took time. But when his case complied at the 50 000 mark, he was done. He'd applied for a lien reduction. But as we know, the property must be in full compliance in order to come before this board. And he had little things like a hot water heater that didn't get permitted. He
in compliance with this original notice ‸ for quite some time. It just took him this long to get to the board because of things like outdoor storage on the property when we did our inspection. Or like I said, the hot water heater needing a permit. Or he would have been here last month, but they had a plumbing issue and he fixed it. And he didn't have a permit to do so. So I just wanted to be clear that the length of time for the actual lien was not substantial. It was not three years. Once he took over the property, he began working on it and fixing it. But the
the other meetings and stuff that he's referring to was him trying to get here to ask for the lien reduction. But we can't hear a lien reduction unless the property is in 100 compliance with all city code. So he was running into problems with that through tenants and stuff. But what pertains to the lien, he wasn't the owner in the beginning. He took the property. He fixed it up to what it looks like today. But he did not own the property in those first pictures that you've seen. That
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:35–01:50:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:51:04–01:51:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:51:21–01:51:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
and the title company told you before purchasing the property that there were violations committed to that. um ‸ but you said you didn't know the amount of the fines. Why did it not occur to you to figure that out prior to purchasing? I'm just wondering.
So there are different things to my understanding. The violations did not have a number attached to that. There was just violations that needed to be corrected. And that I, if, if I correct it on time, I was able to get them removed. And I've done that before. So the, the numbers I started occurring once the lien got imposed to the house, that was 225
the moment that I bought the property, I will not have bought the property if there was a lien on it or if there was already a violation or a fine imposed on, on the property. because
you said that you knew that there was violations, but you bought it anyway because you were going to fix them later, quote unquote. That was your testimony here earlier. Yes. I'm,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:52:29–01:52:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:52:50–01:52:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:53:06–01:53:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:53:08]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Augusto Gonzalez” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
her that I needed to refinance my house and that I needed to clear the violations. It's been too long to please, you know, let's walk that house one more time and do it. What I'm trying to say to you today is if I knew. That this was happening, I will not have that conversation with her and I don't know
we, we've been talking for many months with this, uh agent yet. I was never told in person or in writing that this was happening on my back while I was working on the property while I was trying to comply with you guys. So that's the thing I've never seen this paper in my life. First
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:54:16–01:54:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I have a finding of fact. I don't know if Darla has the order imposing. um his compliance date was December 19th. Of course, we don't have a board meeting in December. um officer Carver left and officer
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:54:45–01:54:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:55:14–01:55:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:55:20–01:55:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:55:53–01:56:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it was empty for a while He, he did not put tenants in. um and then in 2022, he did install some tenants, but by then you ready to do the lien reduction. Of course they leave stuff underneath the carport. They leave items in the backyard. These things all delayed Mr. Silver from getting here. But I ‸ wanted to focus on where the lien actually was. The lien was not in all these inspections that we have been doing with him. Most recently, he corrected them in a fairly timely manner. um that's why his
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:56:37–01:56:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
on the inside of the living room. The laundry room had electrical issues. He had to get an electrician. um so once he took over the property, he worked pretty hard to get it
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:57:13–01:57:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, I mean, it's kind of unique that we have someone come in here and say, hey, I did a title search and I knew about these violations, but I bought it anyway. Yeah. um I have a problem with that because this is the taxpayers money, to be honest. You understand
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:57:59–01:58:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And you knew before you bought the property. You were noticed to come to the hearing, even though you say I didn't get it. You have a piece of paper in front of you and they say they mailed it. That's not my address.
standard is to send the certified as the primary, but then we automatically post all the properties as well. That way if it doesn't get delivered certified, the property in violation is posted. We do that on every code case.
So that means in theory, if someone's working on their property, they have to walk by that sign that says this property is in violation. Is that what you say?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:58:54–01:59:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And that's, that's one question you're asking. And ‸ the other one is that how long you've been doing this, uh silver enterprises services? Since 2020,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:59:42–01:59:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:59:55–01:59:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh Yes. With the city of Sanford, it was violations, no money attached. I bought the property. We clear out, made it the most beautiful property on the street and
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:00:08–02:00:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:00:16–02:00:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So you are familiar with with issues when they come to code enforcement and yes issues that they come in and let you know that there's something on permits and all that. Yes. you know You know the process. Yes. And
Yeah. What I'm saying is the sign was if it was posted, it got removed. We never saw it. It wasn't like it was there and I ignore it. I walk by it. ‸ What here's here's what please listen to this and you can make the decisions that you want that you need. But listen to this. How is it possible?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:01:08–02:01:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
communications with this court enforcement agents and building departments? And I will let this link go through all that same at the same time. Do you think I would have known? If I would have allowed that to happen? If that's that's ‸ why I'm trying to explain to you and show you that I'm being honest with you. i
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:01:29–02:01:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
what you I don't disagree with any of your arguments about yes. the value I knew about about the violations. Yes. I know the process. But at the same time there was things that they were done ‸ on my back. Not because of ‸ their fault or not because they were doing it on purpose, but it was incorrectly. Can I share a little experience building department went to my house to do an inspection that same house and they, um they failed the inspection because they found other work that was done without a permit. You know what happened? The other work that was done have been done with the permit under the old system that they used to have. the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:02:39–02:02:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:02:57–02:03:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:03:26–02:03:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:03:35–02:03:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:03:56–02:03:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:04:01–02:04:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:04:12–02:04:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:04:28–02:04:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I would just like to let Mr. Silver know that this is a ‸ recommendation to city council. So this is the board's recommendation. The council will still have to hear it and then they can alter, you know, higher lower whatever they decide. They're the final say. So I just wanted to let you know that this
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:05:38–02:05:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you. I appreciate you coming. all right so We have some other business we need to discuss. We have a, have to take a vote on a December meeting. all right. So I am making a motion to not have a meeting in December.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:06:19–02:06:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So I am making a motion that we enjoy our December holidays, uh without having a meeting with the notion and understanding that we look forward to a nice lengthy meeting on January to bring the year in. Well, hopefully not.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:07:18–02:07:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:07:22–02:07:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:07:44–02:07:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:15–02:08:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:58–02:09:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:09:02–02:09:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:09:07–02:09:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Security and he worked on the border in Laredo, but he's back in town and we happen to have the opening. So we're lucky enough to have, um Mr. Michael Mack come back to us and you guys will be seeing him. who
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:09:24–02:09:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:10:13–02:10:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:10:33–02:10:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:10:53–02:10:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording