Built from draft minutes printed in an agenda packet — no AI-written textBriefing final
The City's record
What the City's record shows
Draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-05-21, pp. 9–11; approved with amendments by the Board of Adjustment according to the draft minutes of 2025-05-21, whose own approval is recorded in later draft minutes but not yet confirmed in the City's approved minutes; the approving motion: “approve the May 21, 2025, Agenda moving item B to A and A to B and the April 16, 2025, Minutes with corrections made to the Members Present and Members Absent section”; the amendment is quoted from that motion and is not applied in these records. The City has not posted the approved minutes.The approving motion, “to approve the May 21, 2025, Agenda moving item B to A and A to B and the April 16, 2025, Minutes with corrections made to the Members Present and Members Absent section”, is in the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-07-16 agenda packet (1903_Full_Agenda.pdf, packet pp. 7–14).
Built only from this meeting's draft minutes (1832_BOA_Regular_Meeting_5_21_2025.pdf, packet pp. 9–11). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.
Attendance (the roll call)
The roll call could not be read reliably from the minutes' text (the reading did not include Quattrocchi, who voted later in the meeting), so it is not stated here; the first page of the minutes is the record.
Adopted actions (3)
to approve the April 16 , 2025 Agenda as written and the January 15, 2025 Minutes with an amendment to correct the spelling of Chairperson Quattrocchi’s last name (moved by Shaia, seconded by Dyar); PASSED 5-0; ayes: Shaia, Butler, Dyar, Quattrocchi, Pacheco; nays: none — the draft minutes, packet pp. 9–11
to accept the variance as presented and the two conditions recommended by staff (moved by Shaia, seconded by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record)); PASSED 5-0; ayes: Shaia, Butler, Dyar, Quattrocchi, Pacheco; nays: none — the draft minutes, packet pp. 9–11
to adjourn the April 16, 2025, meeting (moved by Dyar, seconded by Pacheco); PASSED 5-0; ayes: Shaia, Butler, Dyar, Quattrocchi, Pacheco; nays: none — the draft minutes, packet pp. 9–11
Draft minutes, as printed in a later agenda packet
Draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-05-21, pp. 9–11; approved with amendments by the Board of Adjustment according to the draft minutes of 2025-05-21, whose own approval is recorded in later draft minutes but not yet confirmed in the City's approved minutes; the approving motion: “approve the May 21, 2025, Agenda moving item B to A and A to B and the April 16, 2025, Minutes with corrections made to the Members Present and Members Absent section”; the amendment is quoted from that motion and is not applied in these records. The City has not posted the approved minutes.
MEETING MINUTES
April 16, 2025
A Regular meeting of the Board of Adjustment of the City of Cocoa was held on Wednesday ,
April 16, 2025 in the Council Chambers at 65 Stone Street, Cocoa, as publicly noticed.
I. OPENING MATTERS:
Chairperson Quattrocchi called the meeting to order at 6:00 pm.
The Recording Secretary called the roll.
ROLL CALL:
Dan Quattrocchi Chairperson
Robert Butler Vice Chair
Robert Dyar Board Member
Pam Shaia Board Member
Jose Pacheco Board Member
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Pam Shaia Chairperson
Robert Butler Vice Chair
Robert Dyar Board Member
Pam Shaia Board Member
Jose Pacheco Board Member
MEMBERS ABSENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
Kristin Eick Assistant City Attorney
Luci Ribeiro City Planner
Breanna Earley Assistant City Clerk
Patricia Weeks Deputy Mayor
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA & MINUTES:
* Motion by Board Member Shaia; Seconded by Board Member Dyar to approve the
April 16 , 2025 Agenda as written and the January 15, 2025 Minutes with an
amendment to correct the spelling of Chairperson Quattrocchi’s last name.
Board of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
April 16, 2025
Page 2
Ayes: Shaia, Butler, Dyar, Quattrocchi, Pacheco
Motion Passed Unanimously (5-0).
III. OLD BUSINESS:
None.
IV. NEW BUSINESS:
A. PZ-25-00800002– Variance (1704 Manor Dr)
Consideration of a variance request pursuant to Appendix A, Article XI, Sec 3. (F) to
allow up to a 5’ reduction to the required 8’ side yard setback. The property is identified
as 1704 Manor Dr. Tax Parcel ID: 24-36-20-01-*-176
Luci Ribeiro, City Planner, presented a PowerPoint about the consideration of a variance
at 1704 Manor Dr.
1
Chairperson Quattrocchi asked if the applicant would like to speak.
Richard Taylor, the applicant, spoke about his variance request and thanked the board for
their consideration.
Chairperson Quattrocchi asked about a metal shed on the property.
Mr. Taylor explained what kind of shed was on his property.
Board Member Shaia asked if the home is registered with the historical society due to the
home being 100 years old.
Mr. Taylor stated it was not due to the property’s siding.
Board Member Shaia asked about the flooring.
Mr. Taylor spoke about his home and wanting to keep the Florida history.
Chairperson Quattrocchi opened the hearing to the public.
Jeff Nave, 1708 Manor Dr, spoke about the history of his property and the applicant’s
property.
1 1704 Manor Dr Variance Consideration Presentation
Board of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
April 16, 2025
Page 3
Frank Sullivan, 1705 Indian River Dr, spoke about his history in the area and the
applicant’s property.
Aleck Greenwood, 640 Brevard Ave, spoke about recognition from the Brevard
Historical Commission.
Chairperson Quattrocchi, asked which registry or designation it was.
Mr. Greenwood clarified and continued speaking about preserving historical buildings.
There being no further questions or comments, the public portion of the hearing
was closed.
Motion by Board Member Shaia; Seconded by Chairperson Quattrocchi to accept
the variance as presented and the two conditions recommended by staff.
Ayes: Shaia, Butler, Dyar, Quattrocchi, Pacheco
Motion Passed Unanimously (5-0)
V. OTHER BUSINESS:
VI. NEXT MEETING DATE:
The next meeting date for the Board of Adjustment is May 21, 2025.
VII. ADJOURNMENT:
Motion by Board Member Dyar; Seconded by Board Member Pacheco to adjourn
the April 16, 2025, meeting.
Ayes: Shaia, Butler, Dyar, Quattrocchi, Pacheco
Motion Passed Unanimously (5-0).
There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 6:24 P.M.
______________________________________
Dan Quattrocchi, Chairperson
______________________________________
Breanna Earley, Recording Secretary
Agenda (the City's wording)
No time links are shown for this meeting.
An item without a time link may still have been discussed; the link is only added when the automatic match is strong.
I. Opening Matters
1. Invocation
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Roll Call
II. Approval of Agenda and Minutes
1. Agenda: Regular Meeting of April 16, 2025.
2. Minutes: Regular Meeting of January 15, 2025.
III. Old Business
IV. New Business
1. PZ-25-00800002– Variance (1704 Manor Dr)
V. Other Business
VI. Next Meeting Date
VII. Adjournment
Transcript Partial transcript
Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have
not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard.
It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's
minutes do that (above).
A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. “▶ Play” opens the recording at that moment, as the City's file, in a new tab.
79 suspect passage(s) marked in place.
How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 9 voices separated from the audio.
6 short machine repair(s) (6 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one.
Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs, whether a voice was detected where the words are and a language review for likely mishearings.
A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 94.1% of 3,519 content words.
Dotted words (97 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading.
79 passages (21% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there.
Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:02–00:00:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:14–00:00:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:00:50–00:00:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes. So if we can get a motion to approve. Well, one small little minor thing. I have two C's in my last name. Sometimes I see two C's. Sometimes I don't. Oh, okay. It's okay. That was the only thing on the minutes.
in favor? Yes. All in favor. I'm sorry. To approve ‸ the motion to approve the agenda and the minutes. All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? All right. Both pass. Moving on to new business then for the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:02:37–00:02:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:43–00:02:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:52]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:02–00:03:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:06]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
reduction to the required eight feet side yard setback for an accessory structure. The zoning district is a single family residential and the future land uses a low density residential. So the subject
[00:03:23]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:23–00:03:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:28]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and encompasses approximately 0.3 acres. So the property was originally
[00:03:39]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:41–00:03:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:47]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
appears that the boundary line changed something between 1924 and 1964. At some point before 1964, the owner of the lodge directly to the north built part of their home over the original property line.
[00:04:03]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:03–00:04:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:04:18–00:04:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:19]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
property owner to correct the encroachment. As you can see the triangle in red. So the original delineation for the property was changed and we believe it was between 1924 and 1965.
[00:04:35]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:35–00:04:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:37]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
had an adjustment
[00:04:39]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:39–00:04:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:44]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
this property. Setback requirement for accessory structures such as detached garages or sheds are intended to prevent overcrowding, avoid encroachment into neighboring properties and maintain adequate spacing between structures. These standards contribute to preventing to preserving property values, ensuring the safety and privacy or adjacent parcels and promoting the overall character and liability of residential neighborhoods. The applicant's narrow driveway leads to an existing detached garage, which currently maintains a nonconforming side yard setback of approximately 1.95 feet. The existing garage appears to have been built around the same time
[00:05:36]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:36–00:05:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:40]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:40–00:05:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:45]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the subject property is currently only 1.96 feet from the boundary line.
[00:05:50]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:05:50–00:05:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:05:51]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
does not comply with the 8 feet side yard setback required by the zoning district.
[00:05:58]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:58–00:06:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:01]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
to the shared property line and adjacent to
[00:06:05]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:06:05–00:06:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:05]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
driveway, leaving minimal separation between the two properties as you can see in this picture. So on February 19, 2025, the property owner, Mr. Taylor, who is here present submitted a building permit application to demolish the existing garage and built a new 20 by 40 foot
[00:06:30]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:30–00:06:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:32]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
The proposed garage will be placed 5 feet from the northern property line, which is 3 feet short of the required 8 foot side yard setback. Because of this, Mrs.
[00:06:46]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:06:46–00:06:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:46]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
is requesting a variance to reduce the setback from 8 feet to 5 feet. While the applicant is requesting a reduced setback, the proposed 5 foot distance represents an improvement over the existing 1.9 foot setback.
[00:07:07]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:07–00:07:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:11]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
have listed as the factors. First is the property's history that includes the irregular boundary adjustments due to a past encroachment issue, which has affected the usable space. The existing driveway is narrow and positioning in a way that makes realignment difficult. You know, it's hard for him to have a driveway that's going to align with his garage. There are also an underground power line running near the northeast corner of the lot, about
[00:07:42]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:42–00:07:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:45]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
While this line does not serve as the home's primary electrical source, its placement further limits buildable area. The applicant has shifted the garage southward as much as possible to avoid the power line while still trying to maintain usable access from the driveway. Additionally, mature trees occupy the southern portion of the lot. I have to go back because I did not attach an illustration from the trees, but you can see in this picture that all the trees that are located on the southern portion. So staff does not recommend their ‸ removal, removing trees to accommodate a garage as they add to the site's environmental value and character. If the applicant were to comply with the ‸ full eight foot setback, it ‸ would require shifting the garage significantly of the driveways alignment, as I mentioned before.
[00:08:49]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:49–00:08:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:52]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
that would limit vehicle maneuverability in the garage's intent of use. So as a summary of the analysis that was completed and you can find in your report while the applicant is requesting to reduce the setback, we feel is an improvement because now
[00:09:11]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:11–00:09:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:15]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
And just to go back here and illustrate really quick. So in yellow,
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:37–00:09:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:12–00:10:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:17]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
any concerns or complaints from neighbors. The applicant has showed that garage would not impact his neighbor to the north. He provided letters, affidavit, is also attached to this package showing that they don't have issues with reducing the setback from eight feet to five.
[00:10:39]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:04–00:11:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:09]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
minimum side yard side back from eight feet to five feet in the single family residential IU 17 zoning district with the following conditions. The subject accessory structure shall not be expanded or
[00:11:22]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
modifying
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:11:22–00:11:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:11:23]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
in any way without obtaining a variance approval from the Board of Adjustments. So this would be limited to his 20 by 40. If he has to adjust the size for something more than that, he would have to come back and ask approval from the Board.
[00:11:39]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:39–00:11:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:43]▶ PlaySpeaker 6 (introduced as “Lucy Hibedo” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
all necessary approvals to install a metal detached garage. Our required permits must be obtained within 12 months of the Board's approval and any other conditions necessary by the Board of Adjustments. And I just want to imply that he does have a building permit on hold at the moment for this detached garage. Thank
and helping me navigate things. So, and my ‸ only effort is to, you know, follow all the rules and processes so that ‸ my neighbors are also taking care of who are here. You know, so that, so that, so the process works itself. So I just want to say thank you. But the presentation covered everything.
One thing I didn't see in here was like, it talks about a metal shed. And does it fit the character or like, what ‸ does that mean a metal shed? Do you have any pictures of that or?
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:43–00:13:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
prefabricated garage and the colors of the, what I could say, choose to, to accent with the home is the colors and the horizontal features of the side paneling. There's like a choice where you can do vertical or horizontal. So I elected to pay the extra money for the horizontal.
sir. Yeah. Because the ‸ siding is plastic horizontal siding. And the colors should be, we're actually going to match the paint to the home after the ‸ building's finished. Okay. ‸ Cool. If it all works out. So it's all that I could afford, honestly, with the prices, how they are, as far as the building material and the type of building.
Yes, ma'am. I attempted to register it through, through the Brevard registry service and they came out to review. But the, I think because of the siding, they didn't give specific reasons. It's, it's not applicable to get it on the registry officially.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:28–00:15:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:15:40–00:15:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:57–00:16:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:16:39–00:16:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:07–00:17:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:10]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Jeff Nave” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
down
[00:17:10]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Jeff Nave” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:17:10–00:17:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:12]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Jeff Nave” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
And we do believe that the two homes were built by brothers. Wow. Now we're not sure whether they were built on as of one lot or how that was done. But then at some point when they subdivided through there, they had to be able to do that.
[00:17:24]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Jeff Nave” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:29–00:17:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:32]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Jeff Nave” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the line. Um, when we purchased the home and moved in several years ago, about 10 years, 12 years ago now, uh, the garage was there. We knew it was there. And it was a, it's a neighborhood that we live in where everybody knows each other. I'm sorry. We're front porch people. We don't all retreat to our backyards and close the gates. We all know each other and I don't really see a big deal about his wanting to do something in his backyard
[00:18:07]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Jeff Nave” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:18:07–00:18:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:18:07]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Jeff Nave” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
[00:18:44]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Frank Sullivan” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and, uh, my folks live there. Of course I wasn't born there, but, uh, we didn't have a hospital here either. It looks like we're not going to have a hospital again. It's a different subject. But anyway, uh, I've been there all my life. Uh, but I've,
[00:19:00]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Frank Sullivan” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:06–00:19:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:09]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Frank Sullivan” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
So I've, I've lived in, in Cocoa all my life and I've lived in the house, either their house or our house for the last 87 years. So, and they're good neighbors. They've been good neighbors. They've cleaned the place up. They've, they've,
[00:19:22]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Frank Sullivan” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:22–00:19:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:25]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Frank Sullivan” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
they've got, but they've, they've made improvements to the, to the house. And it's, I'm amazed that it's not on the registry just because of the siding.
[00:19:33]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Frank Sullivan” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:33–00:19:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I have a house on Highland street that was built in 1901. And so I looked into it also in addition to color other properties, because that's my thing. I love old buildings that were built many, many years ago. Um, and there's two facets to getting that recognition. Uh, the second decision that the people are looking to do, um, is ‸ probably where I'm going to go as well. If you get the designation with the plaque and all that, you are very limited on any alterations you, you do to that property. You can't even change the windows out. So if you get that designation, it needs to stay exactly like it is. So there's one of the limits to it. I'm wearing, I'm wearing my builder's hat right now. So just to be
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:07–00:21:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ I'm going to guess on the actual title, ‸ but to get the designation, that's what was told to me. Okay. And the second level is where they're considering on getting it on the registry, because if I needed to change the window without altering majorly the look of the property, and I'm going to protect that integrity, just like I noticed, uh, these owners of this property are wanting to do, which I think is a very good idea. I think that they're doing everything they can to preserve it.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:45–00:21:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Uh, but that's some of the reasons for the hesitancy of not being able to get that done. You have to consider both. They even were thinking of doing that
And that was another discussion I had with another owner of a very old piece of property. Just thought I'd share that and I'll bring the car in a matter of five minutes. I promise.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:01–00:23:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:01]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Frank Sullivan” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:28–00:23:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:34–00:23:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:12–00:24:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:34–00:24:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording