[00:00:03] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And I just read right over it. Thank you.
[00:00:06] Attribution uncertain
Is
[00:00:06] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
that the poll? Yeah. I'm not going to waste time on that.
[00:00:12] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:12–00:00:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:13] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:00:16] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:00:17] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
‸ Fine. Okay.
[00:00:20] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
This actually is missing, this motion is missing part of what we talked about.
[00:00:25] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:25–00:00:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:28] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:00:31] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice
So we have what we want.
[00:00:34] Speaker 5
They
[00:00:35] Speaker 4
have what they are
[00:00:36] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
proposing.
[00:00:37] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:37–00:00:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:40] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:00:41] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Otherwise, the site plan is
[00:00:43] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
done.
[00:00:44] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
It's just the equipment side of it. You saw that, too. So we're still sitting around at 85 minutes or
[00:00:50] Attribution uncertain
something. That
[00:00:50] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
is
[00:00:50] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
on page six. Bring it up. All of it.
[00:00:53] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:53–00:00:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:55] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
Yeah, the poll. Thank you. That one
[00:00:59] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
is.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:00:59–00:00:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:01:02] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
That's funny. I appreciate it.
[00:01:05] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:01:05–00:01:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:05] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:01:05] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:01:08] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 00:01:08–00:01:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:08] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
wouldn't want you to think I didn't read
[00:01:09] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
your hard work, Lori. Say again? I wouldn't want you to think I didn't read your hard work.
[00:01:15] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
No, I appreciate it, because I don't read it.
[00:01:20] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:20–00:01:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:22] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:01:22] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:01:23] Attribution uncertain
You
[00:01:23] Speaker 6
know, council meeting.
[00:01:24] Speaker 3
I've been working
[00:01:25] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
on it for
[00:01:25] Attribution uncertain
a
[00:01:25] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
few days. I won't
[00:01:27] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 00:01:27–00:01:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:27] Attribution uncertain
it.
[00:01:33] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice
‸ I have a correction to the minutes.
[00:01:35] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:35–00:01:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:36] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:01:36] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:01:36–00:01:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:42] Speaker 6
happy new year. Happy new year.
[00:01:43] Attribution uncertain
Happy new
[00:01:43] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
year. How's your voice, man? Good? Good. Good.
[00:01:51] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Do you
[00:01:52] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
have to special order the tie?
[00:01:53] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:53–00:02:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:56] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:01:56] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:01:59] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:02:00] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:02:01] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
[00:02:10] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
before then. Mr. Mayor,
[00:02:15] Attribution uncertain
we're
[00:02:15] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
just
[00:02:15] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
waiting. Mr. Mayor, we're waiting for the city manager and city attorney to come down.
[00:02:22] Speaker 6
Thank you, ma'am.
[00:02:26] No voice detected
Uh,
[00:02:26] Attribution uncertain
what's.
[00:02:26] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:02:26–00:02:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:26] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:16]
[00:02:46] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
This sounds like they're coming in now. And doors open. That's okay. Good.
[00:02:52] No voice detected
Of course. Okay.
[00:02:56] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
All right. That ordinance is an ordinance. Yes, ma'am. Yeah.
[00:03:01] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:01–00:03:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:01] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:03:05] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:03:05] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:03:06] Speaker 2
Yeah. He's putting a card in. He's putting a card in. Mm.
[00:03:11] No voice detected
Mm.
[00:03:12] Speaker 2
Mm. Mm.
[00:03:13] No voice detected
Mm. Come
[00:03:17] Speaker 6
on, y'all.
[00:03:18] No voice detected
Okay.
[00:03:19] Speaker 6
Okay. Let's get started. You do
[00:03:21] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:03:21–00:03:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:28] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:03:28] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:03:28] Speaker 6
call this regular meeting. ‸ Everyone, please secure your cell phones and pages.
[00:03:33] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:33–00:03:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:39] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:39–00:03:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:46] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:46–00:03:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:54] Speaker 6
um, agency member. ‸ Would everyone please stand?
[00:04:01] Attribution uncertain
‸ We
[00:04:01] Speaker 6
do.
[00:04:02] Attribution uncertain
But
[00:04:02] Speaker 6
you believe.
[00:04:03] Speaker 8
We will everyone please.
[00:04:06] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:06–00:04:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:08] Speaker 8
to you on this evening for allowing us to arrive at this beautiful city hall, uh,
[00:04:11] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:04:11–00:04:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:12] Speaker 8
Coco.
[00:04:13] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:13–00:04:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:16] Speaker 8
the great decisions, only the best decisions for the city of Coco as that you continue to watch over us and guide us throughout this, uh, upcoming year.
[00:04:24] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:24–00:04:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:26] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:04:26] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
pray. Amen. Amen.
[00:04:32] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I pledge allegiance to the flag
[00:04:34] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
of the United States of America
[00:04:36] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
and
[00:04:37] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
to the Republic for which it stands, one nation on the guard, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.
[00:04:47] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:47–00:04:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:49] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
please, ma'am.
[00:04:52] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:04:52–00:04:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:54] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:04:55] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:55–00:05:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:56] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:17]
[00:05:13] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:05:13] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:13–00:05:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:19] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:05:19] Speaker 6
10th, 2023. What are the
[00:05:22] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:22–00:05:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:26] Speaker 6
the floor by Vice
[00:05:26] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:26–00:05:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:32] Speaker 6
the question. All in
[00:05:32] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:32–00:05:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:33] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:05:35] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
[00:05:41] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
made aware that we do have a meeting uh following our cra meeting
[00:05:46] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:46–00:05:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:51] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Happy New Year's to everyone. I have
[00:05:54] Speaker 2
a
[00:05:55] Speaker 6
correction. Okay, ma'am.
[00:05:56] Speaker 2
On page six, the motion uh by agency member dial and seconded by myself approving the issuance of an RFP as a hotel for the site at 603 Brevard Avenue. The as a hotel part was left out and we've specifically voted on it as a hotel.
[00:06:16] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Okay.
[00:06:16] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And I think that's
[00:06:18] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
an
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:06:18–00:06:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:06:18] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice
important part to put
[00:06:20] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
in there. So you want to reflect to have that added please? Is that what you're saying? You're making the motion yes, sir. To include that? Yes, sir. Okay, we have a motion on the floor by agency member X and a second by agency
[00:06:30] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:30–00:06:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:33] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:06:34] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:06:37] Speaker 6
Thank you for the point of clarification.
[00:06:39] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:39–00:06:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:42] Speaker 6
have a card here on the delegations. uh
[00:06:45] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:45–00:06:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:54] No voice detected
thank you sir
[00:06:55] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:06:55–00:06:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:57] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:06:57–00:07:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:58] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
[00:07:05] No voice detected
there
[00:07:05] Speaker 4
was a previous person that has recently bought
[00:07:13] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:13–00:07:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:23] Speaker 4
showed a concern about the parking that was eliminated because of the
[00:07:27] Speaker 4 · Machine re-recognized
extra
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:07:27–00:07:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:07:28] Speaker 4
footage that was provided for two businesses in town. uh There are still people saying that we can't afford losing spaces. We're talking about six just between those two places. And that's something that I highly recommend. uh The other one is about the volunteers that are available for different boards. I'll bring that up before the council meeting. and I don't think that this would be the right way to
[00:07:52] No voice detected
do that ‸ And
[00:07:53] Speaker 4
that's basically it. Please consider the subject about the parking that we are lacking. And giving it away like that, this is not ‸ Thank you.
[00:08:06] Speaker 6
Thank you very much, sir. Moving on to item number four presentations. Saying none. Item number five, hotel RFP discussion. uh We're going to have a PowerPoint presentation, if I'm not
[00:08:22] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:22–00:08:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:31] Speaker 6
too, as well.
[00:08:32] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yeah, I'm actually doing that one.
[00:08:33] Speaker 6
Okay.
[00:08:35] Speaker 9
um
[00:08:36] No voice detected
And,
[00:08:36] Attribution uncertain
um
[00:08:36] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:36–00:08:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:41] Speaker 9
um uh
[00:08:44] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:44–00:08:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:49] Speaker 9
before we actually, uh begin to develop the RFP and get, um some sort of broad guidance on
[00:08:57] Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized
there.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:08:57–00:08:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:08:58] Speaker 9
But the, the big issue for us, and as you all are well aware is actually being able to have some assurances that the, whomever the winning proposer, uh is going to be, has the, the capacity, financial capacity to do the project. And so, um just wanted to talk about that amongst a few other things
[00:09:23] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:23–00:09:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:26] Speaker 9
uh under experience. And again, we had actually, uh I did remember that the direction was to develop that site as a hotel. And so, ‸ and these are probably more in the form of questions or if you don't have any concerns, I'll just continue down the list there. So, so again, in terms of experience there, um and
[00:09:46] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:46–00:09:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:49] Speaker 9
but we're proposing that the hotel be of sufficient quality and meet standards to be rated a, uh a three diamond, um hotel. uh ‸ I'll stop at sort of the end of these in case you guys have comments or suggestions you remember the rating goes all the way up to five. And so, um you know, ‸ three diamond is, is, a uh maybe run of the mill, but, but again, ‸ wanted to get your thoughts on that.
[00:10:22] Speaker 6
um
[00:10:22] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:22–00:10:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:24] Speaker 6
ma'am.
[00:10:24] Speaker 7
So what's an example of a three diamond? So just so I have an idea in my mind.
[00:10:32] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Like, is it
[00:10:32] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
a, it's not a Hilton? I mean, is there a brand name or can you name a hotel in this area?
[00:10:40] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I don't think they're brand specific.
[00:10:45] No voice detected
um
[00:10:46] Speaker 9
Charlene, she'll, she'll Google real quick and and try to get you some examples there. um
[00:11:04] Speaker 1
‸ So according to AAA, it says the three diamond is
[00:11:06] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:06–00:11:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:14] Speaker 1
effort and it has a fresh and trendy dining out event and it, I'm still looking to see if there's any listings that they have.
[00:11:29] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:29–00:11:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:34] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
a,
[00:11:35] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:35–00:11:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:39] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:11:40] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
on the listings between one and five.
[00:11:51] Speaker 9
So,
[00:11:52] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:52–00:11:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:57] Speaker 9
in hopes that, uh the proposers would submit something higher than that. But again, just wanted to sort of set the
[00:12:05] Attribution uncertain
uh
[00:12:05] Speaker 9
the floor, if you will, that at the, uh at the, uh three diamond. um again, we're, we're proposing that, uh the parties submit written proof that they've actually successfully financed and completed at least one similar hotel project within the last five years. um uh you know, again, ‸ they, they have to have actually there, they have to be in the business and they have to be recently in the business there. So that's why we're proposing. You got to be able at a minimum to show that you've actually done something within the last five years. And I'll keep going unless you guys have any objections there. uh the,
[00:12:51] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:51–00:12:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:56] Speaker 9
um it was primarily mixed use or if it's not mixed use, then it's a sort of a standalone self-contained, um hotel with on-site food and beverage. um I think you'll still want to maintain that. uh ‸ The 107 rooms,
[00:13:14] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:14–00:13:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:18] Speaker 9
to actually meet the parking requirements or or uh Brian if we if we remember that. so So I think we're looking at
[00:13:25] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:25–00:13:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:29] Speaker 9
as a minimum. um ‸ And then proposing that you show us what you've done, you know, um again through some sort of uh proof, uh specifications, uh photographs, uh promotional videos or anything like that. Again, we just we want to see uh your product there. So so those are the bullet points that we have under experience there. And if you don't have anything to add, I'll move on.
[00:13:57] Speaker 1
‸ Agency members, I did find some uh three diamond hotels within the Brevard County area, uh
[00:14:03] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:03–00:14:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:05] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:05–00:14:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:08] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:08–00:14:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:13] Speaker 1
triple a standards. Thank you.
[00:14:15] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
so That's a positive precedent that is established. Okay,
[00:14:19] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
so are you guys good with those under and obviously We have we'll have other other requirements, but again, just wanted to get this sort of broad uh guidance there under financial requirements there up front We're saying that uh
[00:14:34] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:34–00:14:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:41] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
of 75 000 and you can read the language there. And so up front you got to put uh something on the table that sort of gets you uh in the game, so to speak, you know, I don't think we had any of those requirements in the previous RFP. And so and so that that would be there for purposes of of uh of the work that we would need to do to to the uh develop the redevelopment agreement or to actually negotiate and and prepare the redevelopment agreement. uh Each proposer must submit with their
[00:15:14] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:14–00:15:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:19] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
uh from a surety company that's licensed in the state of Florida. And that letter must be stipulate that the firm is bondable uh for a minimum of the
[00:15:30] Attribution uncertain
of
[00:15:30] Speaker 9
the estimated construction dollar amount, um
[00:15:33] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:33–00:15:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:37] Speaker 9
construction dollar amount now. And so we're sort of somewhat guessing at
[00:15:41] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:41–00:15:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:47] Speaker 9
as we get closer to issuance of the RFP. And so, these first two bullet points are, well, all of these are different for this new RFP. We're we're we're literally saying, you got to prove to us up front with the submission of the RFP that you can finance this project. uh Each proposer uh will submit, uh again, copies of previous proof of uh
[00:16:14] Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized
a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:14–00:16:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:16:14] Speaker 9
uh fund letters or other funding documents there. And so, we want to see that you you not only put it together for this project, that you you were actually successful in doing it for uh projects in the
[00:16:28] Attribution uncertain
in
[00:16:28] Speaker 9
the most recent uh past there. um And then, um a proof of uh funds of a letter from a bank mortgage mortgage company, private lender, uh no later than the date the site plan is considered for approval by the city. uh uh
[00:16:45] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:45–00:16:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:49] Speaker 9
because we're saying, upon your consideration of the site plan, you gotta you gotta again, provide this proof of financing. so So, we've sort of moved all of that to the front of the process. um Anthony, ‸ good on those explanations? uh
[00:17:10] Speaker 8
Yes.
[00:17:10] Speaker 9
Okay. um And then, under incentives, again, this is this is a pretty straight deal there. The the the land the
[00:17:24] Attribution uncertain
land
[00:17:24] Speaker 9
is a is ‸ a trade, the land for the construction and the provision of, obviously, the hotel, but the
[00:17:31] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:31–00:17:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:32] Speaker 9
uh free public parking spaces there. so So, again, and,
[00:17:38] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:38–00:17:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:42] Speaker 9
many spaces ‸ Right
[00:17:44] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
now, as is, between 85 and 92, depending on how people
[00:17:48] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:48–00:17:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:48] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:17:48] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:17:53] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:17:55] Speaker 9
taking what we have there and putting it
[00:17:57] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:57–00:17:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:59] Speaker 9
You know, obviously, the hope is is that someone can um can offer more. but But, again, the site, the size of the site probably limits what they
[00:18:09] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:09–00:18:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:16] Speaker 9
that may be vacated and conveyed ‸ as needed. I think previously those were needed for stormwater.
[00:18:24] Speaker 5
‸ Yes, they're needed for stormwater as well as the on-street parking requirements. And then on factory, the previous applicant needed it for their canopy area, the typical drop-off area for hotels.
[00:18:37] Speaker 9
And ‸ then, obviously, you know, as ‸ electric vehicles, ‸ we see more and more electric vehicles, then we want some consideration of perhaps the private and the public spots to have, parking spots to have some charging stations there.
[00:19:01] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:19:01–00:19:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:02] Speaker 9
haven't settled in on a number there, but, again, just to speak to that point and ‸ hopefully get some ‸ proposers that ‸ are going to consider electric charging stations there. Those are, again, the first two are really the only incentives. We're not talking about a reimbursement of CRA revenues or tax increment funding. It's a straight deal where the land is conveyed for building the hotel and for the provision of the public parking spaces. And, again, to the extent that some portions
[00:19:45] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:45–00:19:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:50] Speaker 9
and for ingress, egress and those sort of things. And then, lastly,
[00:20:00] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:00–00:20:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:02] Speaker 9
the proposer must successfully negotiate and execute a redevelopment ‸ agreement with the CRA within three months of being selected by the CRA board to proceed with negotiations.
[00:20:16] Attribution uncertain
You
[00:20:16] Speaker 9
know, again, we want to move quicker than we've moved before. And so, again, we've put this timeline in here where in three months after your approval of the developer, that's the timeline that they have to negotiate and bring back a deal to the CRA. And then this is fairly typical, a commitment to complete construction within 12 to 18 months
[00:20:50] Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized
of
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:20:50–00:20:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:20:50] Speaker 9
the date that the site plan is approved by the city.
[00:20:54] Speaker 6
Yes.
[00:20:55] Speaker 9
And any other suggestions that you may have? Again, hopefully we can do fairly quick work and bring back the actual RFP document at the next CRA meeting.
[00:21:10] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:10–00:21:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:16] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:21:16–00:21:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:17] Speaker 2 · Machine re-recognized
You've obviously taken our past experience into consideration and set us up for a little bit smoother, a little bit quicker completion of this project. I think all of these things, it looks like you've addressed everything that I could have thought of or the wrinkles that we ran across over the last four years. Appreciate staff's effort on this. Thank you.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:21:17–00:21:42 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:21:44] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:21:44–00:21:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:45] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:45–00:21:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:47] Speaker 6
for me. Thank you, ma'am. Agency member costs.
[00:21:49] Speaker 7
Yeah, so next month we could approve an RFP and then how long
[00:21:54] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized
with
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:21:54–00:21:54 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:21:54] Speaker 7
the RFP be out? Did you say that?
[00:21:57] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:57–00:22:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:00] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:22:03] Speaker 9
you may want to leave out more than 30. But we'll bring back that suggestion at the next meeting.
[00:22:10] Speaker 7
And then, I mean, do we have any minimum of proposals? Like if we only get one proposal, I guess we consider it.
[00:22:21] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
I think
[00:22:22] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:22:22–00:22:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:22] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
get more than one.
[00:22:25] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
‸ I guarantee you get more than one, ma'am. Okay. Guaranteed.
[00:22:32] Speaker 9
On the parking, Brian and I did talk about sort of alternative. Because you remember the city, I think the city owns, right? The Oleander lot? Yes. Yes. That's not a CRA. So ‸ we do have the Oleander lot and, you know, possibly some consideration of developing that lot as a part of the deal.
[00:23:04] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:04–00:23:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:09] Speaker 9
Maybe surface parking. But ‸ to actually say, hey, ‸ can you consider developing that as a part of the deal? So maybe perhaps for less public spots at the hotel and, again, trying to squeeze more out of that lot. Because, again, we ‸ just have the raw land and we still need ‸ to undertake some sort of design of that parking lot, design and construction of it.
[00:23:48] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice
So, are you referring to, which lot are you referring to?
[00:23:52] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:52–00:23:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:52] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:23:52] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:23:52] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:23:52] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:23:52] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
parking lot.
[00:23:53] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:53–00:23:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:58] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:58–00:24:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:58] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:23:59] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:23:59] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:24:03] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:24:06] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:24:07] Speaker 6
With addition, the bill is here to you. We even expand that.
[00:24:12] Speaker 7
Yeah.
[00:24:12] Speaker 6
We'll leave that alone.
[00:24:14] Speaker 7
Well, other than festivals, is that filling?
[00:24:17] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Say that again? Other than
[00:24:19] Speaker 7
for festivals, is that particular parking lot filling?
[00:24:22] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:24:22] Speaker 7
mean, I've noticed when I'm down here on the weekend that there may be a couple cars in
[00:24:27] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
those lots, but not unless there's a
[00:24:30] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
festival. I
[00:24:31] Attribution uncertain
mean,
[00:24:31] Speaker 9
I don't know how, unless someone's down here more often than I am on.
[00:24:35] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:35–00:24:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:39] Speaker 9
activity in that lot.
[00:24:43] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:43–00:24:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:50] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
right there,
[00:24:51] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:51–00:24:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:54] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
‸ on the weekends, I think that lot is used primarily for those two establishments since it's in close proximity. And
[00:25:01] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
I ‸ think if it was improved, you would see that use.
[00:25:04] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:25:04–00:25:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:05] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:25:05] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:25:06] Speaker 5
it would probably mirror what's happening at
[00:25:08] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:08–00:25:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:08] Speaker 5
Correct.
[00:25:14] Speaker 9
And so, again, we'll figure out some sort of way to throw that in there as you get extra credit or something, if you can figure out a way to provide some parking for us on that.
[00:25:31] Speaker 6
Any other questions for the project timeline in reference of the hotel RFP? Okay,
[00:25:40] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:40–00:25:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:45] Speaker 6
waterfront park
[00:25:47] Speaker 8
infrastructure
[00:25:47] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
parking update on priorities and project.
[00:25:51] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:51–00:25:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:52] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:25:52] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:25:57] Speaker 1
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
[00:25:58] Speaker 6
Yes, ma'am.
[00:25:59] Speaker 1
As you know, we are in a unique opportunity with the hurricane Nicole and some of the damage that was brought on by the storm to make some changes to the waterfront area, work on some infrastructure projects. And as a result of that, with the parking and everything else that we have is to consider a CRA plan update of the plan that we did update in 2018. Many of you were part of that discussion of that CRA plan update where we had several workshops and created priorities, cost measures, and goals and objectives for what the CRA would like to do over the continuum of its existence within the city of Cocoa. And as a result, we did a lot of work on the waterfront with
[00:26:57] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:57–00:27:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:00] Speaker 1
other amenities that we worked on. And Hurricane Nicole, unfortunately, took a ‸ trend ‸ to take out some of those amenities that we have. So I think it is probably a goal of the CRA to work towards creating new priorities, revising the CRA plan as it currently stands, and working to creating goals and objectives to get the CRA through its sunset in 2041.
[00:27:34] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:34–00:27:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:40] Speaker 1
‸ and work towards finding some funding to get us through the projects. Now, with some of the things that we have done over the last few months with some of the comp plan amendments that we've done with the city, working on some development within the CRA, if ‸ we see some increase in development of the five-acre parcel of the Bank of America location,
[00:28:07] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:07–00:28:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:14] Speaker 1
the next few years. ‸ And I think with what priorities we have and what knowledge we have ‸ of where we are on certain tasks, we just want to be able to move forward and do a plan amendment that would be the best measure for the CRA and for the city of Cocoa.
[00:28:34] Speaker 6
Any questions for Mrs. Nooneman?
[00:28:40] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:40–00:28:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:46] Speaker 2
of final decisions?
[00:28:48] Speaker 1
Yes.
[00:28:49] Speaker 2
Okay.
[00:28:49] Attribution uncertain
It,
[00:28:49] Speaker 1
it,
[00:28:50] Speaker 2
it, workshops or.
[00:28:51] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
There, there will be workshops.
[00:28:52] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Okay.
[00:28:53] Attribution uncertain
Um,
[00:28:53] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
one of the discussions that we've had is to actually. We seek out, uh, ‸ subject matter experts in engineering, architecture, waterfront experience to assist us with these goals and objectives to help develop the plan in a way that will take it forward to the next level. I think it's important. To
[00:29:17] Attribution uncertain
discuss the mitigation
[00:29:17] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
and everything else.
[00:29:19] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I think it's important that the public understand that we're running out of time and you think 17 years is a lot of time, but when you're talking about projects that take 2 or 3 or 4 years each, it's not a lot of time. So the more public education we can do and the more public input we can get the happier I'll be.
[00:29:35] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:29:35–00:29:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:36] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:29:38] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:29:38] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:29:40] Speaker 6
Is that it? Any other questions for it?
[00:29:45] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:45–00:29:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:48] Speaker 6
Any updates and staff reports?
[00:29:51] Speaker 1
Uh, no reports and no updates at this time.
[00:29:54] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
Thank you. Our next meeting will be held Monday, February the 6th, 2023 at 6 PM.
[00:30:01] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:01–00:30:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:05] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
And again, happy new years. And how about those Georgia bulldogs?
[00:30:10] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:10–00:30:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:17] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
Councilwoman calls.
[00:30:18] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:18–00:30:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:19] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
[00:30:24] Speaker 7
talked about the architectural, um, design. Well, it was architectural standards. Actually, it was an analysis, I guess.
[00:30:35] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:35–00:30:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:38] Speaker 7
And I know that this, um, agency, you know, voted to have that done.
[00:30:43] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:43–00:30:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:43] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:30:44] Speaker 7
And has that been distributed? And, uh, will that be taken into consideration? I mean, we still have never had a discussion on it.
[00:30:54] Speaker 1
Uh,
[00:30:55] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:55–00:30:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:59] Speaker 1
We were still in the draft phases with that.
[00:31:01] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:01–00:31:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:03] Attribution uncertain
That was two years ago, of
[00:31:03] Speaker 7
course. So, that was a decision of this body. And we put the money forward. I mean, I've been through it. It's been quite a while.
[00:31:15] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:15–00:31:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:19] Speaker 7
And
[00:31:19] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:31:19–00:31:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:19] Speaker 7
pretty enlightening. Um, is there a reason we can't make it available or discuss it or incorporate it into our discussions?
[00:31:28] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:28–00:31:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:35] Speaker 1
on accepting it or creating additional changes to the plan. Before we make it public.
[00:31:42] Speaker 7
Okay.
[00:31:52] Speaker 6
Are you finished, ma'am?
[00:31:54] Speaker 7
Yeah, I was just waiting to see if there was something else. Um, I mean, is there an interest in seeing it?
[00:32:01] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yeah. Yeah. And I think it's an important document to incorporate it.
[00:32:05] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yeah.
[00:32:06] Speaker 2
Revisit the plan.
[00:32:08] Speaker 7
Yeah, it was all about creating some consistency, you know, some look and feel within the village. So, um, and it was enlightening in that there were a number of architectural features that
[00:32:20] Speaker 3
I really wasn't aware of. Or,
[00:32:23] Speaker 7
you know, couldn't articulate until reading that. So.
[00:32:27] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized
They could
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:32:27–00:32:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:32:28] Speaker 7
be good to look at it. Thank you.
[00:32:32] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:32:32–00:32:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:32] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:32:32] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:32:32] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:32:33] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:32:38] Speaker 6
Second by vice chairperson.
[00:32:40] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:40–00:32:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:40] Speaker 6
Just gonna call the question.
[00:32:41] Attribution uncertain
All
[00:32:41] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
in favor saying aye.
[00:32:43] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:32:43–00:32:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:43] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:32:43–00:32:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:43] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:32:43–00:32:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:44] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
I just have unanimously. See you all in about 15, 20 minutes. Start council meeting. Thank you. Great job.
[00:33:00] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:33:00–00:33:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:03] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:33:07] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:33:09] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:33:11] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:33:11] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:33:12] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]