Board of Adjustment

Board of Adjustment Regular Meeting

Date
2024-01-17
Status
City minutes and machine transcript available
Source
CivicClerk event #1158
Built from the City's minutes records — no AI-written text Briefing final

The City's record

What the City's record shows

Built only from the City's minutes (1621_BA_Reg_Minutes_01_17_2024.pdf). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.

Attendance (the roll call)

  • Listed present when the roll was taken: Pam Shaia, Patricia Weeks, Dan Quattrocchi
  • Arrived after the roll: Kaitlyn Aliano (the minutes note: “arrived at 6:1 1pm”)
  • (Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
  • Absences: the minutes print an “ABSENT” heading with no names under it.
  • Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Luci Ribeiro (Planner), Abigail Morgan (Public Works Director), Kristin Eick (Assistant City Attorney), Monica Arsenault (Recording Secretary)

Adopted actions (4)

  • to approve the January 17, 2024 Agenda as written (moved by Weeks, seconded by Quattrocchi); CARRIED 3-0 — the City's minutes, p. 1
  • to approve the November 8, 2023 minutes as written (moved by Weeks, seconded by Quattrocchi); CARRIED 3-0 — the City's minutes, p. 2
  • to approve the waiver request from Appendix A, Zoning, Article XIII, Section 19(1) of the City of Cocoa Code to waive the requirement to provide stormwater retention facilities to retain the runoff of water resulting from a ten-year storm experience to include the conditions recommended by staff (moved by Weeks, seconded by Quattrocchi); CARRIED 4-0 — the City's minutes, p. 2
  • to approve a variance request from Appendix A, Zoning, Article XIII, Section 6 of the City of Cocoa Code to reduce the required 5-foot accessory structure setback in the rear yard by approximately 2.5 feet and the required 8-foot side yard setback by approximately 5 feet for an approximate 16-foot by … (moved by Weeks, seconded by Aliano); CARRIED 3-0 — the City's minutes, p. 4

Agenda (the City's wording)

The City's agenda for this meeting is on file (BA_Reg_Agenda_01_17_2024), but its item list has not been read reliably by machine yet, so no outline is shown.


Transcript Partial transcript

Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard. It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's minutes do that (above). A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. No recording can be started from here.

Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.

[00:00:00] Speaker 1
Roll call, please.
[00:00:07] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Pam Shia. Here. Patricia
[00:00:09] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:09–00:00:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:16] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:00:17] Speaker 1
If a law rise for the Pledge of Allegiance.
[00:00:20] Speaker 3
Patricia,
[00:00:20] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
would you
[00:00:21] Speaker 3
like to leave it, please? Certainly. Thank
[00:00:22] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
you.
[00:00:22] Speaker 3
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America
[00:00:28] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:00:28–00:00:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:34] Speaker 3
liberty and justice for all.
[00:00:36] No voice detected
Thank you.
[00:00:43] Speaker 1
So the next thing we need to do is approve the agenda in the minutes. Our agenda is attached. It's the regular meeting tonight. Any questions on the agenda?
[00:00:53] Speaker 3
No, I move we approve the agenda.
[00:00:56] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Thank you. Do I have a second?
[00:00:57] Attribution uncertain
I second.
[00:00:57] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Thank you. All in favor? Aye. Wonderful. All right. And then we have our minutes from our special meeting on November the 8th.
[00:01:06] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:06–00:01:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:08] Speaker 4
Yes. Yes.
[00:01:09] Speaker 1
And any questions?
[00:01:10] Speaker 3
No.
[00:01:11] Attribution uncertain
Nope.
[00:01:11] Speaker 1
Do I hear a motion to accept? Yes.
[00:01:13] Speaker 3
I move a motion. I make a motion to accept the special meeting minutes.
[00:01:17] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Thank you.
[00:01:18] Speaker 3
Second.
[00:01:19] Speaker 1
Thank you. All in favor?
[00:01:21] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Aye.
[00:01:21] Speaker 1
Wonderful. All right. We don't have any old business. We'll move on to the new business. Item number A under new business was withdrawn. We don't need to do anything with that. Correct? Thank you. Okay. We'll move on to item number B. Okay. That's
[00:01:40] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:40–00:01:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:48] Speaker 1
Okay.
[00:01:57] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
Good evening, everyone.
[00:02:14] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:14–00:02:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:17] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
appendix A zoning article 13 section 19
[00:02:21] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:21–00:02:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:24] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
provide stormwater retention facilities to retain the runoff of water result resulting from a 10 year storm experience.
[00:02:32] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:32–00:02:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:38] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
The property is located on
[00:02:39] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:39–00:02:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:44] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:44–00:02:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:49] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
The future land
[00:02:50] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
used
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:02:50–00:02:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:02:50] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
for this property is commercial with general commercial zoning and is
[00:02:54] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
leased
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:02:54–00:02:54 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:02:54] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
to a window tinted business. The applicant made an agreement with
[00:03:00] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
brightline and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:03:00–00:03:01 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:03:01] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
the general contractor
[00:03:02] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:03:02–00:03:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:03] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
signal responsible for installing the new train tracks. The applicant
[00:03:08] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
agreed
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:03:08–00:03:09 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:03:09] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
to allow bright line to use a portion of the property in question. 2705 North Coco Boulevard in exchange. They would provide construction services that included setting old
[00:03:20] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
castle
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:03:20–00:03:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:03:21] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
concrete blocks on the property and elevating the existing grades behind the concrete curb on the south side of the property.
[00:03:32] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:32–00:03:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:37] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
Coco code of ordinance for performing construction without a permit and for the new grading that require a site plan amendment. During the review process for a site plan amendment application public works in accordance with the city of cocoa. Code requested that the applicant provided storm water retention. Proportional to the square footage of the imperial impervious area on site in addition to the storm water runoff resulting from a 10 year storm event.
[00:04:14] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
Waiver analysis. This is not a new development project and
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:04:14–00:04:21 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:04:21] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:04:21–00:04:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:22] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
area on site is pre-existing. The property which has
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:04:21–00:04:26 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:04:26] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:04:26–00:04:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:26] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
one acre was developed around
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:04:26–00:04:28 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:04:28] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:04:28–00:04:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:30] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
parcel is 0.58 acres or 25,265 square feet of
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:04:29–00:04:38 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:04:38] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:38–00:04:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:38] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:38–00:04:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:42] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
area. To meet
[00:04:44] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:44–00:04:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:47] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
the stormwater retention facility would need to retain the stormwater runoff from impervious areas resulting from a 10-year storm experience, experience within the limits of the property. The precipitation frequency estimated for a 10-year, 24-hour storm event is 7.47 inches or 0.6225 feet.
[00:05:12] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:16]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:12–00:05:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:29] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
The stormwater runoff is typically retained in a stormwater pond. If the pond were two feet deep, which is typically for a dry retention area, the area of the pond would be approximately 5,000 square feet. This would leave little to no room to maneuver on site safely. There are no major safety concerns associated with the request. The changes on site created a minor drainage disturbance to the property to the south, which the property owner will address as a condition for approval. The site grading and blocks installed created a minor water flow to the south property and with further evaluation, the property owner began to install a curb cut to redirect the flow
[00:06:20] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:20–00:06:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:26] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
right away. As requested by Public Works, Mr. Tomasco initiated site improvements that include the following,
[00:06:39] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:39–00:06:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:42] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
avoid ‸ erosion, create a curb cut, grade designated area to assist flow direction towards curb cut, indirect stormwater runoff from the driveway to the
[00:06:57] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
storm or
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:06:57–00:06:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:06:57] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
inlet within the public right away. Outside
[00:07:00] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:07:00–00:07:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:02] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
be completed in a few weeks.
[00:07:07] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:07–00:07:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:12] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:12–00:07:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:14] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
section 19 one stormwater retention facilities regulations with the following conditions. The waiver should not be effective until after the applicant has secured all the permits and approvals necessary for any development related to the waiver, including applicable site plan amendments and building permits.
[00:07:34] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:34–00:07:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:39] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
The applicant should coordinate with the city engineer and obtain approval of the agree upon site improvements as follows. To create a four-inch to six-inch berm soda to avoid erosion, to create a curb cut, grade designated area to assist flow direction towards curb cut,
[00:07:59] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
indirect
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:07:59–00:08:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:08:00] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
stormwater runoff from the driveway to the stormwater inlet, locating within the public right away. If you have any questions, we do have the applicant here, Mr. Tomasco and also we have our city engineer, Abigail Morgan for any questions you may have.
[00:08:16] Speaker 1
Thank you very much.
[00:08:18] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:18–00:08:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:23] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:08:24] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:08:26] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:08:28] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:08:28] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:08:31] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:08:33] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:08:38] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
The
[00:08:39] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:08:39–00:08:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:41] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:08:42] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Does the applicant have anything to say in addition? You don't have to if you don't want to.
[00:08:48] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:48–00:08:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:54] Speaker 7
We
[00:08:54] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
understand that. All right. Thank you, sir. Okay. Do I hear a motion?
[00:09:01] Speaker 3
I move that we accept the recommendation with the agreed upon improvements with the weight. What was the? With the conditions.
[00:09:12] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:12–00:09:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:16] Speaker 1
Thank you. Do I have a second?
[00:09:18] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:18–00:09:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:18] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Thank you. I'll call for a vote. All in favor. Aye. Aye.
[00:09:22] No voice detected
Thank
[00:09:22] Speaker 1
you very much. It passed. All right. We'll move on to the next item, which, let's see. C on the agenda was withdrawn. Okay. We'll move on to item D. And it
[00:09:37] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:37–00:09:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:43] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:09:43] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:09:44] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Meridian.
[00:09:45] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:45–00:09:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:46] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:46–00:09:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:47] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Right. Bye-bye. Okay.
[00:09:49] Speaker 4
Yeah. I have to recuse myself from the vote for this because I know the applicant
[00:09:55] Speaker 3
personally.
[00:09:56] Speaker 4
I just saw that not too long ago. So I'm sitting down. Okay.
[00:10:02] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:02–00:10:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:04] Speaker 8
Yes.
[00:10:07] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Thank you for
[00:10:08] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
coming.
[00:10:09] Speaker 6
‸ For the board,
[00:10:09] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:09–00:10:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:16] Speaker 6
and that will become part of the minutes for the next meeting. Thank you. Thank you very much.
[00:10:24] Speaker 5
We're ready when you are.
[00:10:25] Speaker 1
Okay. Thank you.
[00:10:27] Speaker 5
A variance request from Appendix A zoning, Article 13, Section 6 of the City of Cocoa Code,
[00:10:33] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:33–00:10:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:37] Speaker 5
rear yard by approximately 2.5 feet, and the required eight-foot side yard setback by approximately five feet, for an approximately 16 foot by eight foot.
[00:10:53] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:53–00:11:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:01] Speaker 5
in
[00:11:01] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:01–00:11:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:05] Speaker 5
which was planted in 1924. The property is located on the north side of the intersection
[00:11:11] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized
and Meridian Avenue in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:11:11–00:11:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:11:12] Speaker 5
Fairmont Drive. The applicant's original home was built in 1959, and lies on a substandard legally non-conforming lot. The applicant is seeking a variance to accommodate a shed on the property's northwest side corner.
[00:11:29] Speaker 8
The
[00:11:29] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
applicant is seeking a variance to
[00:11:31] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
accommodate a shed located...
[00:11:33] Speaker 5
I repeated myself, I apologize. I said... So the applicant is seeking a variance to accommodate a
[00:11:43] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized
shadow
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:11:43–00:11:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:11:43] Speaker 5
located on the northwest side corner of the property, which was erected without a building permit. ‸ So the waiver analysis. Due to the drain field and shed location, it appears that the request bears no significant special ‸ circumstances that imposes a hardship on the applicant. The location of
[00:12:05] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:05–00:12:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:10] Speaker 5
shed, does not ‸ prevent the shed from moving the required five feet to the south side to comply with the code. The location of the septic drain field does not prohibit the shed from being moved 2.5 feet east to comply with the code. Despite being a non-conforming law, the applicant has enough acreage to meet yard and accessory structure setbacks.
[00:12:37] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:37–00:12:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:45] Speaker 5
which changed the rear setback ordinance from what was originally 15 feet to 5 feet. This shed
[00:12:53] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:53–00:13:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:00] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:13:05] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:05–00:13:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:10] Speaker 5
Staff believes the
[00:13:12] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized
applicants
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:12–00:13:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:13:12] Speaker 5
has failed to justify the need for a variance as there, and here we show that there is a space on the property for the shed to be installed properly,
[00:13:23] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:23–00:13:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:24] Speaker 5
with Ordinance 08-2023, granting that a shed may be installed five feet from the rear property line and eight feet from the interior property line. As of October 2023, the City of Cocoa Building Department decided to set the minimum size requirement for property owners to request a permit to install a shed to be 120 square feet. Based on the most common permit applications received by the department, there are sheds,
[00:13:57] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized
their
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:57–00:13:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:13:57] Speaker 5
size 8
[00:13:58] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:58–00:14:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:00] Speaker 5
The applicant installed an 8 by 16
[00:14:02] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:14:02–00:14:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:03] Speaker 5
without a permit, and as a result received a code violation. The City initiated
[00:14:08] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:08–00:14:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:12] Speaker 5
changing the rear setback from 15 to 5 feet to accommodate most property ‸ owners. And I should highlight for corner lots. Based on the review of the application, according to the stringent evaluation criteria contained within the City Code, Staff recommends denial of
[00:14:35] Attribution uncertain
a
[00:14:35] Speaker 5
variance request from Appendix A zoning, Article 13, Section 6 of the City of Cocoa Code, to reduce the required five-foot accessory structure setback in the rear yard by approximately ‸ 2.5 feet, and they require
[00:14:50] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized
a foot
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:14:50–00:14:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:14:51] Speaker 5
side yard setback by approximately five feet for
[00:14:55] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:55–00:14:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:00] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:00–00:15:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:03] Speaker 5
That's Monica Pascal and her husband.
[00:15:07] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:07–00:15:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:10] Speaker 1
Yes, I have a card.
[00:15:12] Speaker 6
I
[00:15:12] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:12–00:15:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:15] Speaker 6
The, I think at one point in the PowerPoint, it said it was a waiver. Just want to clarify, make sure for the record that it is a variance that you're being asked to approve or deny as the board deems fit. And also, just wanted to clarify for the record as well, that the ordinance 08-2023 that was adopted by the City Council, it reduces the setback only for purposes of accessory structures.
[00:15:43] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:43–00:15:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:49] Speaker 6
example, sheds. But that, the ordinance didn't change the setback, the rear setback generally for all structures. So I just want to clarify that for the, for the board. Thank you. Thank you very much.
[00:16:03] Speaker 1
Mary Jo Riddle, are you in the room? Thank you.
[00:16:09] Speaker 6
Sorry.
[00:16:10] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:10–00:16:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:11] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:16:14] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:14–00:16:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:14] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:16:18] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Mary Jo.
[00:16:19] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:19–00:16:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:19] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
I apologize. If the applicant would like to speak,
[00:16:22] Speaker 5
I
[00:16:23] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
‸ apologize team.
[00:16:24] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:24–00:16:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:24] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:16:27] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
[00:16:33] Speaker 5
do you want to change the slides? Do you want to do your presentation?
[00:16:36] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
Oh, yes.
[00:16:37] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:16:37–00:16:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:38] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yeah. Here.
[00:16:40] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:40–00:16:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:40] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:16:41] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
Oh, okay. Thank you. Okay. Um, hi, my
[00:16:48] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
name is
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:48–00:16:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:16:49] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
Kirk Passwall.
[00:16:50] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:50–00:16:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:52] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Um, first of all, I thank you.
[00:16:54] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:54–00:16:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:55] Speaker 2
Before you begin, I'm sorry.
[00:16:57] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:16:57–00:16:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:58] Speaker 2
Sure. I need to swear both of you. And if you're both going to speak.
[00:17:00] Speaker 9
Yes.
[00:17:01] Speaker 2
If you could just raise your right hand. You swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
[00:17:06] Speaker 9
I do.
[00:17:06] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Thank you very much. Do you want
[00:17:07] Speaker 9
us one at a time or both?
[00:17:09] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:09–00:17:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:10] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:17:11] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:11–00:17:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:11] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:17:13] Speaker 9
Okay. Uh, as I was saying, thank you, uh, planning zoning for, uh, listening to our variance. Um,
[00:17:19] Attribution uncertain
uh,
[00:17:20] Speaker 9
first of all, this, this is our home when we bought it. As you can see, there's no, uh, carport or garage. That's a screen in ‸ porch chair. Uh, when the house was built in 1959, there was always a shed there. I, I imagine from old records we've seen, there was always a shed and, um, we replaced that shed.
[00:17:40] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:40–00:17:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:41] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:17:41] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:17:42] Speaker 9
When we first bought the house, as you can see how close it is to the house. And it was on the property line, uh, which the neighbors here today, uh, with that property line there. ‸ So in 2020 we had it replaced and, um, basically
[00:17:58] Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized
we're
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:58–00:17:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:17:58] Speaker 9
just asking for grace here.
[00:17:59] Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized
because
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:59–00:17:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:17:59] Speaker 9
I guess we're off by one or two and that's the new shed right there.
[00:18:05] Attribution uncertain
We
[00:18:05] Speaker 9
have it's in the backyard. Okay. And, uh, but what we're concerned about, ‸ I heard what they said about the drain field. Um, but it takes equipment to move this thing. And
[00:18:18] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:18–00:18:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:22] Speaker 9
usually ‸ the shutter people or the shed people,
[00:18:25] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:25–00:18:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:28] Speaker 9
uh, anchored in this one here.
[00:18:30] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:30–00:18:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:34] Speaker 9
where they placed it. So, is
[00:18:37] Attribution uncertain
there
[00:18:37] Speaker 9
any questions?
[00:18:41] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I have a question. Yeah. It sounds like the concern was not only the setback, but also the size of the shed and the fact that there was no permit for it.
[00:18:50] Speaker 9
That's correct. Uh, we were under the impression that we didn't need a, uh, permit at the time when we bought from the, uh, superior sheds. They said no problem. Like I said, this was 2020 when this thing was built. So, um, okay.
[00:19:08] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:08–00:19:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:09] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:19:09] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:19:11] Speaker 10
And
[00:19:12] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:19:12–00:19:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:12] Speaker 10
um, the five years today, I spoke to him actually, and
[00:19:16] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:16–00:19:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:21] Speaker 10
the five years that he's been selling these sheds.
[00:19:24] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:24–00:19:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:27] Speaker 10
have come up to him and said that we have any issues. But he said that for the
[00:19:31] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:31–00:19:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:36] Speaker 10
you don't need, um, a permit. So I said, well, that's the state of Florida. And I know that's what you told us when you sold us the shed. We did not know. We didn't knowingly like break the law of, of going over the shed that with the permit, because we were trusting this guy knew what he was doing. ‸ This is his business. They don't pull shed permits for anything.
[00:20:00] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:00–00:20:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:01] Speaker 10
So, meanwhile, I'm not the mathematician all the time. So I realized that we're about 28 feet over the 100, but that's like water under the bridge. And also then realizing, had we known, we didn't realize, we just kind of trusted and were thrilled to get a shed in there. But Carlos
[00:20:21] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:21–00:20:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:25] Speaker 10
but that we're being
[00:20:26] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:26–00:20:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:29] Speaker 10
him and, and say, that there's issues with
[00:20:33] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
this
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:20:33–00:20:33 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:20:33] Speaker 10
Now, with the setbacks,
[00:20:36] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:36–00:20:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:46] Speaker 10
than if we ‸ would have done it the first time. I understand that ‸ paid a lot more, probably a lot more doing it this way.
[00:20:53] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:53–00:20:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:58] Speaker 10
that space that we would have to move it four or five feet to the right and then, um, about 20 inches forward is what would be in complete completion and come in compliance to your, ‸ to your setbacks.
[00:21:12] Attribution uncertain
So, um,
[00:21:15] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:15–00:21:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:17] Speaker 10
but the way that the lots are cut, they're very odd. If
[00:21:23] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
we
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:21:23–00:21:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:21:23] Speaker 10
go back to, go back to that one. This one, see the shed is tucked into the right, top, top right, which is actually the width wise. We don't have a lot of width. It's wider in the front with the curve, curvature of the, of the corner lot.
[00:21:43] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:43–00:21:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:46] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:21:46] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:21:47] Speaker 10
asked them, unknowing of the permit, like, like, mind you, really oblivious, not knowing anything of, we moved here in 2017. So maybe three years prior to that, we've not had anything, you know, knowing about what, what exactly all the rules are.
[00:22:06] No voice detected
Honestly,
[00:22:06] Speaker 10
part of us thought also through COVID that everything was shut down.
[00:22:10] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:10–00:22:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:15] Speaker 10
as a she sheds and making, you know, Airbnb's and stuff, or, you know, just little cottages and she cottages. We're not
[00:22:20] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:22:20–00:22:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:22:20] Speaker 10
our intent is just to hold our bikes and extracurricular sports stuff.
[00:22:31] Speaker 1
‸ So when did you put this shed in what year?
[00:22:36] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
November of this year. Oh,
[00:22:38] Speaker 1
2020. So you installed, you had this shed built on your property in 2020. November
[00:22:44] Speaker 10
of 2020.
[00:22:46] Speaker 1
And that's when you remove the old shed.
[00:22:49] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Well, a
[00:22:50] Speaker 9
little bit afterwards.
[00:22:52] Speaker 10
The shed that is in the location right now, there was nothing there before. There was nothing there before.
[00:22:59] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:59–00:23:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:05] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:23:07] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:23:07] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:23:10] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:23:13] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
That one is still there?
[00:23:14] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:14–00:23:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:14] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:23:15] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:23:15–00:23:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:17] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:17–00:23:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:21] Speaker 1
2020?
[00:23:22] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:22–00:23:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:23] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:23:24] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:23:25] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:25–00:23:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:28] Speaker 1
new shed put in in 2020.
[00:23:30] Speaker 7
That's correct.
[00:23:31] Speaker 1
And then you removed the shed.
[00:23:32] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:32–00:23:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:33] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:33–00:23:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:37] Speaker 1
you? Was it a local company? Superior Sheds built the blue,
[00:23:41] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
the other... The new one. Yeah. That one.
[00:23:44] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:23:44–00:23:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:44] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:23:44] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:23:44] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:23:44] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:23:44] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:23:45] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:23:46] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And if I
[00:23:46] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
understood you correctly, when you had them come out and give you the quote and build the shed, they were unaware that there was an ordinance at the time in place to say where the shed could be placed and that you had to go in before the city and get a permit.
[00:24:00] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
Correct. They said that they didn't do permits and that ours shouldn't be needing one because it's
[00:24:05] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:05–00:24:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:06] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:06–00:24:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:09] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
with it. We trusted them.
[00:24:11] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:11–00:24:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:15] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:15–00:24:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:16] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:24:17] Speaker 10
So with that, that's why I was trying to reiterate that Carlos Santos is the one that said that we're the first case that we, as of our, as our has ever come up to say that the city of Cocoa is now pointing out a certain, we're the first ones. So anyway, he is willing to get on the phone just to verify that as something to just
[00:24:41] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
so
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:24:41–00:24:41 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:24:41] Speaker 10
it's not hearsay.
[00:24:42] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:42–00:24:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:45] Speaker 10
And I did tell him between six and seven. He said he would be on call if, if he needed to.
[00:24:51] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:51–00:24:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:53] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes.
[00:24:54] Speaker 9
That's correct.
[00:24:54] Speaker 1
Okay.
[00:24:56] Speaker 8
Can I ask city staff something about a code enforcement? I'm assuming they're the ones who surfaced this issue.
[00:25:03] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
Um, I believe the, the applicant here, we see the call violation and then just solve the code violation. They submitted for a building permit at the time when they submit a building permit was around March, 2023. And the application was incomplete. It was missing a survey. And so we never seen the location of the shed at a time, but because there was a lot of issues going on throughout the city for corner lots because of the 15 feet setback requirement for accessory structure, we decided to, so it was a city initiated change of code to accommodate most of the residents that had a shed in corner law.
[00:25:47] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:47–00:25:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:48] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
So at the time there was another, um, local resident that had an issue. So we changed the code, you know,
[00:25:56] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
passed
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:25:56–00:25:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:25:57] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
the ordinance 08 2023. And I believe, uh, the applicant here never saw, never, um, proceeded with the permit application.
[00:26:07] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:07–00:26:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:13] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
They had to resubmit for a permit, but they still, the location of the shed does not meet code. And that's why now they're asking for a variance.
[00:26:24] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
My question about code enforcement is when they were first hit with the violation, how did the code enforcement officer know when it was built? How close? Like to my knowledge, code enforcement officers don't walk through property, right? So this is visible from the street. Was the code enforcement officer able to get all the information they needed to know that
[00:26:46] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:46–00:26:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:49] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:26:49–00:26:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:49] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:26:51] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:51–00:26:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:53] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I don't know if how there is their procedure, but I know it was a complaint. So they went to the property because someone complained about it. Gotcha. ‸ Okay. Thank you.
[00:27:04] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
Can I just reiterate the oddities of all the lot sizes? They're all different. Ours is technically 53 right there. And that one doesn't do it really justice because that gets narrower in the back. of the corner.
[00:27:20] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:20–00:27:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:27] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
the grace
[00:27:27] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:27:27–00:27:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:28] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
variance.
[00:27:28] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:28–00:27:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:28] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:27:28] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:27:28] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:27:28] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:27:30] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:20]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:30–00:27:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:50] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:27:52] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
on, um, I can't see. I didn't bring them up. 21 and 20. They're. I can't see. So whatever you think. These are
[00:28:02] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
my
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:28:02–00:28:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:28:02] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
neighbors here. And I do have some other letters from other neighbors that just would be, um, if you, if I can bring them up so you guys can see them.
[00:28:10] Attribution uncertain
It
[00:28:10] Speaker 10
just
[00:28:10] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
turn them into the book for me.
[00:28:12] Speaker 10
Oh,
[00:28:14] Speaker 3
I do have a question. Um, in what you were saying, do you know who filed the complaint initially?
[00:28:20] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:20–00:28:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:21] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:28:21] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:28:23] Speaker 3
And when was that? When did the complaint come in?
[00:28:25] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:25–00:28:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:26] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:28:26] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:28:28] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:28:29] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes. So the shed had been
[00:28:31] Speaker 3
there all that time.
[00:28:32] Speaker 9
Right.
[00:28:32] Attribution uncertain
Oh,
[00:28:32] Speaker 9
2020. Yes. But we
[00:28:34] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:34–00:28:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:37] Speaker 9
coming into meetings here to get everything changed to five feet to where it is now. That before it
[00:28:43] Attribution uncertain
was
[00:28:43] Speaker 9
15 feet,
[00:28:44] Attribution uncertain
10
[00:28:44] Speaker 9
feet, which is
[00:28:45] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:45–00:28:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:02] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Give us just
[00:29:03] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
a minute.
[00:29:10] No voice detected
Now
[00:29:11] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:29:10–00:30:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:34] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:29:42] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:29:43] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:29:50] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:29:50] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:29:53] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:29:53] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:29:54] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:29:56] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:29:57] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:29:59] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:30:04] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Less well for the yard, but if, you know what I mean, I know right now it's the most ideal for what everything is, but because we have some trees that we would have to possibly, we have two oak trees, one fell ‸ over
[00:30:19] Speaker 6
a
[00:30:22] Speaker 10
year ago in March, and the windstorm knocked it down. So we have ‸ a few, that one tree is in the way of it really, probably having been moved or else it's on the drain field also. And then there's another ‸ foliage of some sort, I don't know what kind of tree it is.
[00:30:43] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:43–00:30:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:46] Speaker 1
Thank you very much. Okay, I'm sorry. Now, Mary Jo Riddle, if you'd like to come forward, please.
[00:30:55] No voice detected
Thank you.
[00:30:59] Speaker 11
Mr. Riddle,
[00:31:00] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:31:00] Speaker 11
just need to swear ‸ in before you speak, please. If you could raise your right hand. Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
[00:31:06] Speaker 12
Yes, I do.
[00:31:07] Speaker 11
Thank you, ma'am.
[00:31:08] Speaker 12
Yes, the corner lot is very small and it's problematic with the way the lots have been drawn all through that whole ‸ area. And because the tree is located where it is, it's very, I don't think it's possible for a machine to come in and scoop underneath and move it.
[00:31:33] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:33–00:31:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:36] Speaker 12
So they would have to pay to disassemble it, to move it, to meet the code, and
[00:31:42] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:42–00:31:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:44] Speaker 12
So ‸ when they
[00:31:47] Speaker 12 · Machine re-recognized
showed
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:31:47–00:31:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:31:47] Speaker 12
that beautiful picture, it's pretty much
[00:31:50] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:50–00:31:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:52] Speaker 12
So
[00:31:53] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:53–00:31:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:56] Speaker 12
a horrible shed. I would suggest that if they make an exception to the code or whatever, that it be well maintained. If it's not well maintained, then it would be an understanding that it would come down. Lot number 10, when we first moved here, put a fence in front of their yard. And it caused a big uproar. And so the city at the time, that was years ago, decided that as long as the fence was well maintained, they would let them have a fence in the front yard, which they have done. And if you look at lot number 10, if you can imagine the house on it, there was not a backyard for them to utilize for their pet. And that was a number of years ago, because I'm old, and that was right around when we first built the house. When they bought the house, this is just my thought.
[00:32:56] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:56–00:33:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:01] Speaker 12
was either permitted or not permitted or the restrictions that the realtor could have made. But apparently they weren't aware of that.
[00:33:12] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:33:12–00:33:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:15] Speaker 12
And what is the impact that
[00:33:18] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:18–00:33:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:24] Speaker 12
it look bad within the neighborhood? Like I said, if you could make an exception like we did with the fence, it's well maintained with the understanding that if it's not well maintained, they would have to take it down. Now, the picture, I think, shows that it's a very well maintained built sturdy shed. It's not like one you buy at Home Depot and that type of thing. I think it would be a financial burden on them to have to pay to disassemble it and haul it all away. Okay? Thank you for my time.
[00:33:58] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes, ma'am. Thank you. I do have another card.
[00:34:01] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:01–00:34:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:06] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:34:07] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:34:07] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
[00:34:13] Speaker 13
I don't take oaths. Jesus' Sermon on the Mount said don't take oaths. It says let your yes be yes and your no, no. Anything else is from the evil one. It's repeated again in the Gospels. So I will tell the truth. I affirm it. If that's sufficient for you. It's a temporary structure. You've got a lot of people here in the
[00:34:43] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:43–00:34:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:47] Speaker 13
There doesn't appear to be a problem with anyone. The shed seller didn't advise that there was a problem. In fact, just the opposite. ‸ No objections.
[00:35:03] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:03–00:35:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:03] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:35:06] Speaker 13
And any additional money required to remediate would be a financial burden. So I just thank you.
[00:35:15] Speaker 1
Thank you very much. Any more comments from the floor? All right. The chair will close the audience and I'll move on to the board. Any discussion from our board members? No.
[00:35:32] Speaker 3
I want a motion.
[00:35:36] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Caitlin, do you have anything? For staff, can you just clarify ‸ if we're approving or denying the variance versus, I think you mentioned the other word, waiver or something? Right. So this isn't a waiver. This is a
[00:35:50] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
variant
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:35:50–00:35:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:35:51] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
So can you just clarify ‸ the
[00:35:53] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
difference
[00:35:54] Speaker 8
between the two since we were clear about the fact that this is a variance?
[00:36:00] Speaker 5
Well,
[00:36:01] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:01–00:36:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:06] Speaker 5
requirements for, um, I don't have to read the code, but there's different requirements for variance and waivers.
[00:36:15] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:15–00:36:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:21] Speaker 5
a variance, not a waiver.
[00:36:23] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:23–00:36:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:25] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
That's all it is. Well, there's different criteria. Essentially, there are two different types of requests.
[00:36:31] Attribution uncertain
A
[00:36:31] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
variance has essentially more stringent ‸ criteria that need to be met.
[00:36:37] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:37–00:36:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:42] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
All I was trying to do is make sure everyone was clear ‸ what was being requested. And it is a
[00:36:47] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
variance.
[00:36:48] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:36:48–00:36:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:48] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:36:48] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:36:48] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:36:48] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:36:49] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Thank you.
[00:36:49] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Okay. So I have a question. Let's see if I can get this out right. So staff is recommending denial of this request. Correct? Correct? Correct. Yes. Yes. Because per codes, there are
[00:37:01] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
certain criteria they have to meet. So the applicant just fell to meet the criteria. Okay.
[00:37:08] Speaker 1
So the chair then needs to ask the members of the board if they want to accept staff's recommendations or deny staff recommendations.
[00:37:24] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:24–00:37:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:26] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:37:27] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:37:28] Speaker 1
recommendations or do, do you understand what I'm trying to ask you without getting myself into trouble? Um,
[00:37:36] Speaker 6
so if you make a motion to deny the variance request, which is consistent with the staff's recommendation and the report, um, you know, you can do that. If you are going to make a motion to approve the variance, then we would need to establish what the reasoning would be for doing so and how, you know, you believe it meets the criteria essentially.
[00:38:07] Speaker 3
Okay. Okay.
[00:38:08] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:38:08] Speaker 3
would speak to that.
[00:38:09] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:38:09–00:38:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:10] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:38:10] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:38:10] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice
I personally would like to speak to that. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
[00:38:13] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:13–00:38:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:15] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:38:20] Speaker 3
were told incorrectly when they bought the shed and they did go based on that because you like to think somebody who's in the business would tell them correctly. And it is a very nice shed. Um, and it's, I can see where it would be difficult to have it moved simply because it was built in place and not dropped in. When you look at the lot and everything, it would be very difficult to move it. The neighbors obviously don't really mind that it's there. So to me, it would be, um, I understand what staff is saying per code, but in this particular instance, I would vote in favor of giving them the variance.
[00:39:00] Speaker 1
I'm in agreement. You're in agreement. Yeah.
[00:39:02] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:02–00:39:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:05] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:39:06] Speaker 3
we, uh,
[00:39:07] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:07–00:39:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:08] Speaker 3
uh, to allow them to have their shed there. Um, leave it where it is. Yes.
[00:39:14] Speaker 1
May I
[00:39:14] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
add
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:39:14–00:39:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:39:14] Speaker 1
the caveat that they keep the area well maintained?
[00:39:17] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:17–00:39:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:19] Speaker 3
That they keep the area well maintained. Yes.
[00:39:21] Speaker 1
All right. And I have a second. I have a second. All right. All in favor?
[00:39:25] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Aye.
[00:39:26] Speaker 1
Motion passed as presented. You get to keep your shed, but please keep it, uh, well maintained. Okay. Is that correct?
[00:39:35] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
Yeah.
[00:39:35] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:35–00:39:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:41] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
to approve as well. Okay. Thank you.
[00:39:43] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:43–00:39:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:45] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:39:45–00:39:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:46] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:46–00:39:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:48] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I'm sorry, guys. I'm sorry. All right. Is there anything else we need to discuss?
[00:39:53] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:39:53–00:39:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:53] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:39:54] Speaker 1
Do I have a motion to adjourn?
[00:39:56] Speaker 3
Motion to adjourn.
[00:39:58] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
All in favor? Aye. Thank you very much.
[00:40:01] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:01–00:40:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:02] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:02–00:40:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:04] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:40:04–00:40:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:04] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:40:05] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:40:05] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]

Transcript revision built 2026-10-27T12:05:25 · 4,266 ordinary words, 1,390 in suspect passages, 64 machine re-recognized.

Ask about this meeting

Use the search to ask a question about this meeting in particular, or compare it across other meetings in the archive.