Partial recording. The available recording covers only part of this meeting. Analysis is limited to the recorded portion.
(capture status: partial)
Built from the City's minutes records — no AI-written textBriefing final
The City's record
What the City's record shows
Built only from the City's minutes (1597_CE_Reg_Minutes_01_21_2021.pdf). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.
Attendance (the roll call)
Listed present when the roll was taken: Jim Gifford, Edward Green Vice-Chairman ’, David Lightholder, Kimberly Curtis, George Brown, Lloyd Roberts, Sharri Scott
(Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
Listed absent: Virginia Weaver
Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Dennis Bunt (Code Enforcement Manager), John Hankins (Interim Police Chief), Steve Murdick (Code Enforcement Officer), Kadi Carver (Code Enforcement Officer), Debra Babb-Nutcher (Board Attorney), Darla Crowl (Recording Secretary)
Adopted actions (24)
to approve to the agenda of January 21, 2021 (moved by Lightholder, seconded by Brown); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 1
to approve the minutes of November 19, 2020 (moved by Lightholder, seconded by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record)); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 1
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record), seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 2
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Roberts, seconded by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record)); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Brown, seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Brown, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 4
to amend Staff's recommendation and Table for (30 days) until February 21, 2021 and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Lightholder, seconded by Curtis); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 4
to amend Staff's recommendation to give the property owner (90 days) April 23, 2021 and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record), seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 5
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Curtis, seconded by Brown); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 5
to amend Staff's recommendation to give the property owner (120 days) May 22, 2021 and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Roberts, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 6
to amend Staff's recommendation and give the property owner until April 21, 2021 (90 days) and the fine be reduced to seventy-five dollars ($75.00) and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Lightholder, seconded by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record)); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 7
to amend Staff's recommendation and a fine of one hundred dollars ($100.00) find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Brown, seconded by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record)); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 7
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Lightholder, seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 8
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Lightholder, seconded by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record)); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 8
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Lightholder, seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 8
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Roberts, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 9
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Roberts, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 9
to approve Staffs recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record), seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 9
to amend Staffs recommendation and table this case to the next Code Board meeting unless complied (moved by Brown, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 10
to approve Staffs recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record), seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 10
to approve Staffs recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Lightholder, seconded by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record)); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 11
to recommend to the City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of one thousand three hundred six dollars and ninety cents ($1,306.90) (moved by Lightholder, seconded by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record)); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 11
to amend staffs recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) (moved by Brown, seconded by Curtis); CARRIED 6-1 — the City's minutes, p. 12
to deny the lawn abatement appeal (moved by Brown, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 13
Motions for which no result was read from the minutes' text (4)
to nominate Mr. Green (moved by Lightholder); no result was read for this motion from the minutes' text — the City's minutes, p. 2
to nominate Mr. Gifford Mr. Gifford requested a paper vote. 4 Votes to reappoint Mr. Gifford, 3 votes to appoint Mr. Green, Mr. Gifford was reappointed as Chairman (moved by Brown); no result was read for this motion from the minutes' text — the City's minutes, p. 2
to nominate Mr. Green (moved by Lightholder); no result was read for this motion from the minutes' text — the City's minutes, p. 2
to nominate Mr. Brown Mr. Gifford requested a paper vote. 5 Votes to appoint Mr. Green, 2 votes to appoint Mr. Brown, Mr. Green was appointed as Vice Chairman (moved by Gifford); no result was read for this motion from the minutes' text — the City's minutes, p. 2
Money named in the minutes' motions (what each motion did with the amount, in its own words)
$75.00 — Code Enforcement: decided in an adopted motion. “amend Staff's recommendation and give the property owner until April 21, 2021 (90 days) and the fine be reduced to seventy-five dollars ($75.00) and find the Property Owner in violation” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (1597_CE_Reg_Minutes_01_21_2021.pdf, p. 7); fiscal period not recorded)
$100.00 — Code Enforcement: decided in an adopted motion. “amend Staff's recommendation and a fine of one hundred dollars ($100.00) find the Property Owner in violation” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (1597_CE_Reg_Minutes_01_21_2021.pdf, p. 7); fiscal period not recorded)
$1,306.90 — Code Enforcement: recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “recommend to the City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of one thousand three hundred six dollars and ninety cents ($1,306.90)” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (1597_CE_Reg_Minutes_01_21_2021.pdf, p. 11); fiscal period not recorded)
$2,000.00 — Code Enforcement: recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “amend staffs recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00)” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (1597_CE_Reg_Minutes_01_21_2021.pdf, p. 12); fiscal period not recorded)
Transcript Partial transcript
Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have
not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard.
It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's
minutes do that (above).
A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. No recording can be started from here.
incomplete recording: The City's published MP4 for this event is truncated on its CDN: 2187264000 of about 2502933846 bytes (87.4%) were published and the file has no moov atom, so no player opens it. The audio of the first 8049 s was recovered from a scratch copy (frame walk of the mdat + libavcodec frame-length oracle); the rest of the meeting is not in any published file.; 503 suspect passage(s) marked in place; inspection incomplete: language review; 2 stretch(es) where a voice was detected and no words were recognized.
How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 22 voices separated from the audio.
44 short machine repair(s) (49 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one.
Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs and whether a voice was detected where the words are. Not completed: language review.
A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 91.8% of 19,874 content words.
Dotted words (502 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading.
503 passages (23% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there.
Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Inspection is incomplete: language review.
Voice detected, no words recognized (2 stretches). Something may have been said here that the transcript does not have:
00:07:16 (23 s) — neither reading has words
00:32:15 (6 s) — neither reading has words
Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.
allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for
And we have an agenda for tonight's meeting. Everyone should have a copy of that. Are there any changes to be noted, other than the ones I have here, which I will note? We have item number 10 is tabled.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:57–00:01:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:00–00:02:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:03–00:02:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:05]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Sorry for the inconvenience. ‸ I have a much larger crowd than usual, which is good. We're glad to see you. Okay. With those changes, I'll take a motion to approve the agenda.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:20–00:03:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:03:37–00:03:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
none. And so the minutes are approved. Thank you. Next item is the introduction of our new police chief. I'll let Dennis Bunt, our code manager, do that.
First, I'd like to submit for the record all the documents and notices pertaining to the cases tonight into the record. And then, as you know, Mike Cantaloupe retired, ‸ leaving a vacancy. Commander Hankins was named as the interim chief, and now he is our police chief permanently. Chief Hankins has worked with the city for 30 plus years. He's probably not going to be with us until April, but he is our new police chief, and he will be attending these meetings.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:28–00:04:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Excellent. Welcome. Thank you. Okay, next on the agenda is, as we do every January, election of board chairman and vice chairman. So I will open nominations.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:04:29–00:04:54 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:59–00:05:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:14–00:05:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:34–00:05:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a paper vote? Yeah, let's do it. Let's do a paper one. if Everybody on the board's got a paper. you can Scrap paper of some kind. you write your uh write your selection and we'll pass those down to the secretary and let
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words the first reading may have missed · 00:06:25–00:06:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:28–00:06:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:07:53–00:08:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:03–00:08:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:25]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; part of a long flagged stretch · 00:08:25–00:08:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the machine readings disagree here; words the first reading may have missed · 00:08:56–00:09:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:11–00:09:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:16–00:09:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:34–00:09:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:46–00:09:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:33–00:11:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:51]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Property
[00:11:52]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
address is
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:11:52–00:11:52 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:11:52]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
411 Thomas Avenue. For the record, I'm Steve Murdoch, code enforcement officer. I'm submitting
[00:11:58]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:58–00:12:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:02]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
accurately depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in ‸ violation of
[00:12:09]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:09–00:12:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:13]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:13–00:12:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:18]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I visited the site 10 times and found no progress made on the property.
[00:12:23]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:23–00:12:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:32]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
violation. I've been working
[00:12:34]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:34–00:12:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:40]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent a notice of hearing on January 4th, 2021. It was sent certified and posted on the property in violation.
[00:12:49]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:49–00:12:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:55]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
into compliance or be fined $50. A fine of $50 being imposed for each day the violations remain until compliance is achieved. And I don't believe the property owners here this evening.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:35–00:13:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:53–00:13:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:12–00:14:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:19]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:14:22]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:22–00:14:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:24]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of permit required, Appendix A, Article 13, Section 5C, which has since complied.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:44–00:14:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:45]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[00:14:45]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:14:47]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
business out ‸ of a residential area, Appendix A, Article 11, Section 3.
[00:14:54]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
I
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:14:54–00:14:54 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:14:55]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
visited the site a total of 10 times and found some progress made on the property. I've attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but my last inspection on January 21st, 2021, the property remained in violation.
[00:15:08]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:08–00:15:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:11]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:11–00:15:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:14]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent notice of hearing on January 4th, 2021.
[00:15:20]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:20–00:15:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:25]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:25–00:15:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:29]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
in violation and given 30 days to come into compliance or a fine of $50 be imposed for each day. The violations reign until compliance is achieved. I believe there's somebody here for the property this evening.
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:15:52–00:15:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:55]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:15:55]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:55–00:15:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:57–00:16:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:08–00:16:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:10–00:16:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:19–00:16:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:28–00:16:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So we just want to say that when he bought the property, he had a fence at the time, you know, after the hurricanes, we didn't know that the, you were supposed to pull a permit for a fence.
replace the fence. So that's what he was doing. Just replacing the backside of the fence, not the size. But since then, since we got a, a, um, a notice of hearing, uh, we pull a permit for the fence, um, about the outdoor storage. Um, you know, those are bikes for the kids. So we're supposed to, where are we supposed to put them?
[00:17:10]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
It's related to the pallets of pavers in the back as well. On the other side, there's some car tires, ladders, um, some other things stacked against the back area by the fence.
[00:17:22]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
It
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:22–00:17:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:17:22]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:32–00:17:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
working on the permit right now, um, that he's going to install those, uh, stones in front of the house. So it's not really pavers. So we're not storing them.
it before then, but now we, you know, we, uh, he's kind of short on, on the money right now, but he's, uh, he's going to catch up to that. So they're not really stored. Um, with the purpose of being a store there, we, we're going to use them for the house really soon on the next couple ‸ months.
[00:18:04]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
As far as the items for, for installation, they just can't be stored outside. It has to be an active job job or work site. They can't be stored indefinitely.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:18:17–00:18:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
there, but actually most of that stuff is, is trash. Uh, once the defense is up, uh, he's going to clean the house up and, and, you know, uh, keep it in good shape. And,
and I believe also that I did with, he, he got a notice because of the trailer enclosed trailer was there. Um, that is supposed to be a business trailer, but it's not, it's a, it's a trailer that has a motorcycle in it. So it's more like a recreational, uh, vehicle that he has for that purpose.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:22–00:19:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
He uses that trailer for utilities. So it's not a really business. So, I mean, he, he uses every now and then and, and same as the trailer. I know that it has a ladder on the top, but I mean,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:20:12–00:20:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
it got broken down. So we, we had to get a mechanic to get it out of there. It wasn't ours. So it's not our vehicle that we use for, uh, for work, but it broke down when they delivered the stone. So, um, yeah, it was there for a, for a week or so, but you know, um, since it wasn't ours, we couldn't spend that money to fix it. So the owner had to find a, um,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:19–00:21:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:24–00:21:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:53–00:21:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:05–00:22:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:13–00:22:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:40–00:22:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We didn't know that the, the, the tires were actually part of the issue. I mean, those are, uh, those are tires for his truck. So, uh, what do we do with them? Put them on the shed?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:00–00:23:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a fully enclosed building, obscured from public view. So you can't just leave it in the yard. The permit would allow you to have anything related to that construction job out there. So as soon as you get a permit for the pavers that you're going to put down, then of course the papers would be allowed. But that doesn't mean you can bring in other items not related to that permit. They, all that has to be in a fully enclosed building.
Right. And, and once again, like, like I mentioned before the, the, the stones were not meant to be there like forever. I know it's taken awhile, but he got him before the COVID pandemic happened.
because he didn't really care about the fence. Uh, at the beginning, he wanted to put the stones up and then he, so that way he can finish, uh, painting the house.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:24:43–00:24:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
their papers are not going to be cemented in the ground. So it wouldn't be a full permit. It would just be planning and zoning authorizing the placement of these pavers, wherever you
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:24:54–00:24:54 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:14–00:25:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:25:16–00:25:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:25:19–00:25:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:23–00:25:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:27–00:25:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
zero nine and we give the owner 30 days to clean up the property to satisfaction. And if it is not completed, be fined $50 a day until it is in compliance.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:58–00:26:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:33–00:26:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:43]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:43–00:26:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:47]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
For the record.
[00:26:48]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:48–00:26:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:50]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I am submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos actually depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of exterior
[00:27:01]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
walls,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:27:01–00:27:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:27:02]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
section 6, 1003 F protective treatment section 6, 1003 B. I visited the site eight times and found no progress made on the property. I've attempted to gain voluntary compliance, but as of my last inspection, January 21st, the property remains in violation.
[00:27:20]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:20–00:27:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:26]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I've brought this case before the code enforcement board is the violations have not been resolved. I sent a notice of hearing on January 4th, 2021, and it was sent certified and posted at the property. The staff recommends in case two zero dash eight zero nine that the owner be found in violation and given 30 days to come in compliance or
[00:27:48]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:27:48–00:27:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:49]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
$50 be imposed for each day. The violations remain until compliance is achieved. And there's nobody here this evening for the property.
Steve, is this, uh, this home you want the whole home painted or do you want it?
[00:28:07]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:07–00:28:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:09]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
There's some issues with some rotted wood as well as some protective treatment issues. So although the total coat of paint would be great, there's going to be some wood repair. Um, and we're basically looking for the areas of the paint that is damaged, stained, flaking, peeling, um, to be repaired.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:35–00:28:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:28:40–00:28:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:00–00:29:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:05–00:29:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:08]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:29:13]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of accumulation
[00:29:23]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:23–00:29:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:28]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
section six, 900 B nine. I visited the site a total of 10 times and found some progress made on the property.
[00:29:36]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:36–00:29:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:39]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
inspection on January 21st, the property remains in violation. I've been working on this case since June 27th and have brought this case before code enforcement board as the violations have not been fully resolved.
[00:29:53]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:53–00:29:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:58]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
and posted on the property in violation. Staff recommends in case two zero dash eight one four that the owner be found in violation and given 30 days to come into compliance or a fine of $50 be imposed for each day. The violations remain until compliance is achieved. And there isn't anybody here for the property this evening.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:30:25–00:30:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:30:28]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
kind of a that's always there, but it's been kind of in flux. They'll clean it up a little bit and backslide. But yeah, what in this picture here is a washing machine and some broken grill equipment. Thanks.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:06–00:31:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:16]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:16–00:31:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:25]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I want to know if you can hear my case where I can meet that other obligation. I'm like [address] it's going, I'll be here to 10.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:51–00:31:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:54]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:14–00:32:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All in favor say ‸ aye. Any opposed? There are none. Motion passes. You'll come forward to the podium, please, sir. And be sworn in. We will hear your case now.
[00:32:34]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:00–00:33:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:05–00:33:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:09]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:20–00:33:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:33:24–00:33:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:27]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
My name is Derek Spencer Collins, senior army retired,
[00:33:30]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:30–00:33:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:39]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:39–00:33:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:47]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Machine re-recognized
i am
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:33:47–00:33:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
submitting photos that I took during my re inspection of the property. They accurately show the condition of the property at that time. This case was brought
[00:33:55]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:55–00:33:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and was found in violation of storing outdoors. This case was ordered by the
[00:34:03]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:03–00:34:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:07]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:07–00:34:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and it was sent certified and posted at this time. The property remains in, in violation.
[00:34:16]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
It looks nothing like that now.
[00:34:18]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:18–00:34:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:21]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
My yard is clear. Even when my code enforcement officer came to the house today, a guy was dropping off a bicycle for me to repair, and I don't repair other
[00:34:32]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
people's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:34:32–00:34:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:34:32]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
bicycles.
[00:34:33]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:33–00:34:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:36]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Even when this Katie comes through
[00:34:38]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
sometimes,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:34:38–00:34:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:34:39]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
people are dropping off things because they see me out in my front yard doing ‸ my hobby. I work on bicycles. I make them look good.
[00:34:47]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:47–00:34:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:48]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
And then they come, how much would you charge me for this? I said,
[00:34:52]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
don't charge anything. If I can help you, I will, but it's getting out of control. The tarp there, that's my dog that just had puppies 10 days ago. I speak to Miss Katie, and what's the guy next to her there?
[00:35:06]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:06–00:35:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:08]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I speak to these people all the time because they're on my street with Provost Park. People say I'm a snitch in my neighborhood because I talk to them so much. What can I do to comply? What do I need to do? And when ‸ Miss Katie informed me that I was being fined after the 19th, I was thinking I had to come back to another board meeting because you all gave me the 30 days in December to get everything done. My yard is totally different. Look at this yard and go back to the yard where it had all the junk in. Same yard.
These pictures are from today. I've stopped. I've spoken to Derek. I've explained to him if he wants to store his cans that he collects with the old bicycles and parts, he needs to do it in a fully enclosed building or behind a fence. He cannot have all the chairs and stuff obstructing the sidewalk. He can't have all the bike parts laying in the front of his yard.
It's all the tarps. It's all the containers. It's all the chairs. It's all the little signs and stuff all put out. Go ahead, sir. So all I'm saying is we discussed this at the first meeting. He was given 30 days. Katie has stopped. I have stopped. I gave him ways to correct these violations. This is supposed to be a front yard of a residential home.
out front. So that's where we are today. I just wanted to make that clear because we've already been through this.
[00:37:13]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
It's eight metal chairs, which they say can be outside chairs.
[00:37:17]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:17–00:37:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:19]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
two tables out because my baby's mother won't let me take it to a restaurant with this COVID. So we get to go. I come here and I show her how a
[00:37:28]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
man's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:37:28–00:37:29 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:37:29]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
supposed to treat a woman. I'm trying to mold my daughter into a beautiful woman. I have eight chairs, two tables. The tarp is for the puppies. Ten days old. I can't just move them around.
[00:37:42]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:37:42–00:37:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:02]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
That's a chest, the white thing there. And then there are two plastic chairs behind that. Then there's a go-kart that I was mounting my motor to. And then this is the
[00:38:11]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
silver
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:38:11–00:38:11 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:38:11]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Question. Can it be, can they be moved inside the fence or put behind the house and put out when you need it?
[00:38:36]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
No. ‸ I have two pit bulls garden inside. I can move the cornhole. The horseshoes are stabilized and there's nothing else in the yard. I told Miss Katie I would wipe my whole front yard out if I could be her favorite person. She said yes,
[00:38:52]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:52–00:38:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:54]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:54–00:38:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:57]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
basketball hoops. It was cluttered. It was cluttered.
[00:39:02]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:39:02–00:39:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:03]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I speak to these people on a daily basis. People think code enforcement are irritating me. I'm irritating them because anytime I see a code enforcement truck, I'm flagging them down. What could I do? What do I need to do? Now when she told me on, I
[00:39:18]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:18–00:39:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:22]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
said, what fines? I never got a letter for the fines. And the next day she brought a picture, a letter.
[00:39:28]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:28–00:39:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:32]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
That's the only time I knew about the fines. I don't even know what the amount of fines are.
do you have room behind your house to do some of this stuff?
[00:40:02]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Very little, because the house sits back and there are two big lots on the side. See, that's one lot. The guy was supposed to take the cans away. The old cans will be gone tomorrow. I won't put them back out there.
[00:40:11]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:11–00:40:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:40:25–00:40:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:29]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
of my cars had to fit on my driveway, and they do. I'm in compliance there. Then the grills, this grill, two plastic chairs, plastic table, and no two circle tables.
Again, I have met with him. I have walked him. I've pointed out every item that needs to be corrected. I've explained to him if he could put up a side obscuring fence. That whole property behind that fence is his.
[00:40:54]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
He has plenty of room to move his hobby into a better location. He even has a garage at the end of his driveway, which he could help store things with. So this is where we are now is that the cans, the buckets, the tarps, the indoor furniture that's sitting outdoors, all that stuff is there. City staff is not really concerned with his cornhole set up off to the side because that's an outdoor event.
that he repairs everything out front, that needs to be relocated into a more appropriate area, which I, like I said, ‸ walked his entire property with him and pointed out. So, here
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:37–00:41:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:38]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I have a video before I came here. Oh wait. And you'll see.
[00:41:42]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:41:42–00:41:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. Well, I'll tell you how this is going to work, sir. We're going to, uh, we're going to take a, make a motion and take a vote. And it takes about two days for the papers to get signed. In the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:17–00:42:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:21]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[00:42:27]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Now they're saying no inside furniture, metal chairs are okay, but they're, they're be gone if they're not legal or in code.
[00:42:35]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
because
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:42:35–00:42:36 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:42:36]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
it's not a legal matter.
[00:42:37]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:37–00:42:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:10–00:43:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:25]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
city big ones, one
[00:43:27]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
recycled.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:43:27–00:43:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:43:28]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:28–00:43:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:36]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
No, no room back there.
[00:43:38]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:43:38–00:43:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes. Now, technically where he has those cans, that fence is actually set back about six feet from the corner of his house. So if you were to stretch it, those cans are actually back behind, but he's got two lots. Yeah. So the place you know the garbage cans is not the issue. It's all the bags of cans and the stuff trying to be covered up in a blue tarp in the background.
The sign of fence is not allowed either, but that wasn't cited in this case.
[00:44:31]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:31–00:44:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:44:33]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:47–00:44:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:53–00:44:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:44:55]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:44:59]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Well, it's they're finding it in non-compliance, which means that the fine is being imposed.
[00:45:06]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
But he
[00:45:07]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
said
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:45:07–00:45:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:45:07]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
it would be two days before that starts.
[00:45:10]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:10–00:45:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:45:11]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
what you need to do is the fine started on the date. They gave you last meeting. You get Katie after you get it cleaned up as quick as you can so she can close it. Then we can discuss those options at that time because there's other options with that fine. But for right now, you're in non-compliance as of December 19th. So you're fine.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:45:32–00:45:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
go back to December 19th. So if she comes out tomorrow and you're clear, she'll close it. And then you're only in violation from the 19th to the 22nd. And then we'll discuss with you how we can take care of that portion of it.
[00:45:44]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Derek Spencer Collins” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I don't know how we're going to take care of that.
So get the property in compliance so we can stop everything. Okay. Then I will walk you through the process on how we can clear up everything. I don't have no
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:15–00:46:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:23–00:46:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:00–00:47:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:07]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:30–00:47:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:45–00:48:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:52]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
[00:48:01]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violations of permit required, Appendix A, Article 13, Section 5C, Storing Outdoors, Section 6900B11. I visited the site six times and found some progress made on the property.
[00:48:19]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:19–00:48:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:23]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
inspection, January 21st, the property remains in violation. I've been working on this case since September 2nd, 2020, and have brought this case before the Code Enforcement Board as the violations have not been fully resolved.
[00:48:37]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:37–00:48:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:41]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:41–00:48:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:49]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
in violation and given 30 days to
[00:48:51]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:51–00:48:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:31–00:49:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:12–00:50:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and showed him where I was doing the fence repair. And he said, it should be no problem with a fence repair. After he came out, he said he got a phone call from somebody saying that I was putting up a fence. And I tried to explain to him, which he was ‸ very respectful, um, that I was only doing a fence repair.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:50:48–00:50:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
finger or something like that at the park because it's so corrupted with drugs. Second, the police chased someone through there and they came through the back over through the bushes and everything had the helicopter
They, uh, stuck a gun to my kids head. I mean, through the door at the window and asked them to open the door because they was running from the police. I went outside and my kids was crying saying that dad don't go out there. But because of the fact that I'm a man, ‸ I have to protect my family. So if I put a fence up and the fence only stopped people for running through putting trash over there and everything else. So it's not like I was trying to disrespect the city. I was trying to do it after I realized that it was a fence that I did a fence repair. So if
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:48–00:51:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:05–00:52:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:17–00:52:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:24–00:52:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:44–00:52:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:04–00:53:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
structure. But nowhere in a building code does it allow an accessory structure without a primary structure. So, and that's where he's running into an issue.
There's an existing slab there. Part of the structure and vacant means anything that's not being attended to something that you have abandoned, not under the problem
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:53:29–00:53:30 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:39–00:53:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:42–00:53:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:47–00:53:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:51–00:53:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:53–00:53:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:01–00:54:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:03–00:54:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:09–00:54:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:10–00:54:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
704. That's where he lives. And then between that and the house next door is the vacant lot. So he could fence 704 and do the whole backyard and around like anybody else, but he can't go into that property that he owns and get a fence permit because there's no house on it. He could join the lots together, make them one lot. Then that would all become his yard. But right now he rents that ‸ house and that's a difficult situation. There's things he can do. I don't know that I would do what the building department is telling him because he doesn't own that property. He rents it. But where it is now, he's not even going
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:53–00:54:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:03–00:55:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
either because it's not a primary structure. Sheds are considered accessory structures. So again, without the house, all your fences, your sheds and everything that would be an accessory to that, 704 would be the primary.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:59–00:56:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
No, I'm pretty positive from the aerials that there was no fence there.
[00:56:12]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:12–00:56:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:15]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
at one time.
[00:56:16]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:56:16–00:56:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:28–00:56:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Larry Sinclair posted that all you have to do is live next to a city official or whatever, and you're allowed to put a fence up, which I was showing y'all in this case that I was only repairing a fence. Second of all, for two years, a homeless guy with a truck and a camper slept back there, sold drugs out of them. And not one complaint came in. But the once I beautified the property and I can show you pictures of the camper and everything sitting back there because I was calling them trying to get help through the cocoa police department, ‸ whatever.
So the guy that owned it, the property, ‸ his niece, they seen such a good job that I did with cleaning up because from that fence or from the back part of that property, all the way up to the existing tree up front was nothing but bushes.
was crowded with bushes and trees? I cleaned all that up by hand, by hand with a chainsaw. I got pictures of all that sitting on the side of the road, ‸ stacking it up on the side of the road.
tree because, and I had other toys that I moved. The reason why when he came through and he took the pictures and I left everything like it was because when he posted up on the fence, the red sign, it says the stop work order. The only thing I did with the property after he came out there, I picked up, I picked up a few things, but I kept the grass and stuff cut because I didn't want it. I didn't want it to overgrow or whatever.
But once he put the stop work order up, that made me think, well, look, you can no longer work on the property and just leave everything the way it was. So that's what I did. I didn't try to hide or sugarcoat anything. You know what
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:09–00:59:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
saying? So I'm not trying to disrespect nobody in here. I'm not trying to throw no rocks at nobody, but it's a simple fence with a gate. That's all I was trying to do. Give my kids somewhere to play
She got riding towards there on the other side of the house because I didn't want to put anything on the property to make it seem like I was trying to hide anything or put it in violation. Sir,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:43–00:59:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is get a surveyor to rewrite a legal description to include the house and the vacant piece of property, $10 fee to record it at the courthouse, and then you can get a permit to put a fence up.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:11–01:00:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I wanted to get with them to try, if they'll build a house for her mom, and that'll ‸ get the house. I'll donate the property to her. But why should I lose my property? What if the lady that I rent from, what if she passes away and her kids say, well, okay,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:00:36–01:00:36 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
saying? Then there will, her future that's gone. I never owned anything in my life. I bought this property because in 1964, my uncle lived there. I can tell you about the house that was on the property. I can tell you why the fence was there
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:52–01:00:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:55–01:00:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
know, I mean, that the house has, the property, the land itself has sentimental value to me. My uncle just died this year. That was, that they had a white house where that tree at, it used to be a white house. The fence that you see coming down the sidewalk, that fence that come right by the bus stop, that fence came all the way down to where that property is with an open gate. That's why you
sign the property over them, then why it can't be so simple and easy for you to say, okay, well, let's give him the permit. Let's, well, don't give me the permit. Let me pay for the permit and find me for whatever the case may be. And just let me have my property for the future well-being of my daughter. Because if the lady died, then I lose everything.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:56–01:02:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:22–01:02:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as far as conjoining the lots because he has no ownership of the house. I don't know that I would venture into that. Yeah. Um, the only property he owns is the vacant. ‸ It's the
house or the property owner that owns the house with me just taking a simple fence and running straight across the property to keep people from coming on the property to avoid, uh, uh,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:56–01:02:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to fence in the vacant lot as part of it. I mean, he, when we talk about the safety and people coming into his yard where he lives, he can fence that off and he can do what he's asking to do. He just can't extend it across that vacant lot.
But they still came through. That's the property they drove the car through when the police was chasing them. That's where the guy got out and ran and came. If you look at the greenhouse where I live at, I still have boards on the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:33–01:03:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:48–01:03:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:52–01:03:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:04:10–01:04:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:21–01:04:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:04:29–01:04:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:37–01:04:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:57–01:05:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:00–01:05:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:05:27]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Property address is 502 Brevard Avenue. For the record, I'm Steve Murdoch, code enforcement officer. I'm submitting the packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found property in violation of permit required. Appendix A, Article 15, Section 2A. Site plan approval required.
[01:05:50]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:50–01:05:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:05:54]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Accessory mobile vending prohibited in Central Business District. Appendix A, Article 13, Section 32D5. I visited this site six times and found no progress made on the property.
[01:06:06]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:06–01:06:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:08]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
But as of
[01:06:09]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:09–01:06:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:14]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
violation. I've been working on this case since October 13th and have brought this case before the code enforcement board as the violations have not been fully resolved.
[01:06:23]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:23–01:06:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:27]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and it was sent certified and posted on the property in violation.
[01:06:31]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:31–01:06:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:38]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
violation and given 30 days to come in compliance or a fine of $75 be imposed for each day the violations remain until compliance is achieved. And
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:55–01:06:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Merritt Island, Florida, 32953. All right. So the mobile vending thing is a quick fix. I just have a simple question. On the mobile vending, if the food truck or whatever mobile vendor is on the property, is that allowed or is it not allowed at all in the village?
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:07:45–01:07:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:07:52–01:07:52 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
certain other zones. I'm not sure what the village meets, but I would get with planning and zoning to see if you zone. That would be the only thing that would prohibit it is the zone that you're in.
Okay. Now, if it's ‸ zoned, ‸ obviously, it must not be because we're getting a violation. So maybe ‸ this violation only pertains to the vendors on the street if we had it ‸ in our parking lot.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:08:15–01:08:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
requested an additional site plan. In the letter, there were some false statements of what was already approved on previous site plans. I've had a few meetings as far as accessory mobile vending with our new city manager. A lot of this stuff is going to be resolved through the new mansion that we have in the city.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:29–01:09:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
talk about changing accessory mobile vending times and where it can be in the village and not. There's also site plan approval required, but there's some verbiage where a lot of the tables and barrels are removable structures.
It was told that there should never be parking on that side, although the new letter came out said that they took away parking. So the city did not pour that curb shut when they showed up,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:22–01:10:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
If right now he does not meet his site plan, the way it's designed and set up, and he's actually overshot his outdoor seating, that could be resolved through planning and zoning. And if it is, then that would not be a code issue anymore as far as we're concerned.
I don't know of any discussion. I have not been a party to any of that. So David's right in the fact of if it was brought to planning and zoning and they determined that what he has there is movable and they alter his outdoor dining, it could all possibly be legal. But right now it doesn't meet the site plan. And that's what the complaint was that came to us.
Well, I'd rather not make decisions based on a code board member's testimony. I understand. But if staff feels that staff has enough information to table it, then fine.
Maybe ‸ if we gave them 90 days. This is only the first hearing. That gives them 90 days to come up with this and ‸ work it out. And if they do, then there's ‸ no violation. That would probably suffice. The first thing that they need to do, though, is go contact planning and zoning and discuss their current site plan ‸ and their outdoor dining.
But even that I don't think would take more than 90 days during the discussion to resolve. So if it makes the board feel better, staff would revise their motion to give them 90 days and have them try to work this out. Then it would still come back here anyway after 90 days.
will be back next month. So if we give them 90 days, that at least gives them 90 days to work on it rather than go through a tabling, tabling, tabling.
[01:14:13]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:13–01:14:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
For the record, I'm Katie Carver, code enforcement officer. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visit. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of storing outdoors, parking in the yard, protective treatment, rental business tax receipt, and weeds. I visited the site a total of six times and found no progress made on the property. I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection on 1-21-21, the property remains in violation. I have been working on this case since August 26, 2020, and brought this case before the Code Enforcement Board as the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent the
[01:15:04]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:15:04–01:15:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and it was sent certified and posted onto the property in violation. Staff recommends in case number 20-1132 that the owner be found in violation and given 30 days to come into compliance or a fine of $125 be imposed for each day the violation remains until compliance is achieved. And there's no one here.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:15:34–01:15:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:14–01:16:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:37–01:16:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:48–01:16:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:16:53–01:16:53 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:59–01:17:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:17:05]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Machine re-recognized
Property address is going to be 1301 Jackson Street. For the record, my name is Katie Carver, Code Enforcement Officer. I am submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of storing outdoors,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:17:05–01:17:24 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:17:24]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:17:24–01:17:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
weeds, accessory structures, boarded up buildings, accumulation of trash and litter, landscape requirements, exterior general condition, parking and yard, permit required for fences, maintenance of
[01:17:48]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Machine re-recognized
structure
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:17:48–01:17:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
slash grounds, and site plan required. I visited the site a total of six times and found some progress made to the property. I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection on January 21st, 2021, the property remains in violation. I have been working on this case since November 10th, 2020, and brought this case before the code enforcement boards as the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent the
[01:18:17]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:18:17–01:18:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It was sent certified and posted to the property in violation. Staff recommends in case number 20-1347 that the owner be found in violation and given 30 days to come into compliance or a fine of $250 be imposed for each day the violation remains until compliance is achieved.
[01:18:40]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:40–01:18:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:18:48–01:18:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:18:57]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:57–01:19:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:19:37–01:19:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:19:42–01:19:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
have a picture behind C4, and it still does look like that. That is legit. They have plants. They're landscaper, so they put in plants and stuff in their backyard. ‸ The roofing we've pulled a permit for. When she came out the first time,
was no parking on the grass, so we put up no parking signs, and we stopped that, and the parking became a huge issue, which we knew would as soon as she took away 14 spots.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:20:47–01:20:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
what was important. What was important was taking care of the parking lot. ‸ Today, she didn't even mention the parking lot, but she had ‸ me go to ‸ planning and zoning about trying to add parking spaces, but there's no place to add them. Where they had said to add them, ‸ our electrical is underground, and there's a big electrical box in that lot. You can't put parking there. They're parking across the street at night. I don't know. We have a permit. We do have the permit pulled. That we know needs to be fixed.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:21:23–01:21:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:21:32–01:21:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:21:37–01:21:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
That was right when I got the letter for this hearing, because as soon as I saw the letter posted that we had to come here, then I called her and asked her. Because
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:22:07–01:22:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
no. I'm asking you, because you and I went over the roofs in 2014. Right. And the roofs were bad then, and you went ahead and just patched roofs. Those roofs have been in bad condition since 2014.
There's peeling shingles that are dry rotted. That needs to be corrected. Your parking lot has holes in it and potholes and your sidewalk. There's a lot of attention that needs to be paid to that complex.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:23:28–01:23:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ But that's for you to regulate, not to have people park all over the place. What I'm trying to say to the board is ‸ this apartment complex has a lot of deficiencies. ‸ Okay, so that's what you need to do then. I'm
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:23:56–01:24:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:04–01:24:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So when she came out with the roof, she came out in August and told us that we needed to fix the roofs. Well, then in September, she said the roofs were fine. She thought there were two different, she thought there was missing shingles and there wasn't.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:24:19–01:24:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I disagree with the fact that she told you your roofs were fine. Your roofs are not fine. You've got divots in your roof. You've got dents. You've got shingles coming up. ‸ That's a failing situation. It needs to be corrected.
Right now, we're collecting not even 50% of our rent since COVID. I mean, it's ‸ really bad. So we've ‸ already got the permit. We've got the supplies I just paid for. They're doing roof A. And then we're going to go on to roof H and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:25:03–01:25:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:25:11–01:25:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:25:19–01:25:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
good. ‸ Let me make this recommendation to the board. We will amend our recommendation from 30 days to 120 days. We will even meet her out there and show her everything that needs to be corrected. And we will work with her for 120 days to move towards getting this apartment complex cleaned up and these violations corrected. If she's willing to do it and he's willing to do it,
Excuse me. I just wanted to say something real quick. I've been there since 2016. And, yes, it's true that it's not a perfect, it's a work in progress, let's call it.
in progress, I had to spend all of my time tiling. And I'm happy to show one of the interiors of our new apartment. So, the interiors brought a little better clientele in, you know, better tenants. With the better tenants came more cars because they actually have jobs. We don't have any drug dealers. I put 16 cameras on the property. I'm passionate about the place. And I want to work with you. 120 days is great to get the outside in shape. But I would love you to come and show me, do this, do that. Because I'm just kind of flying.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:58–01:27:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
just wanted to point out that 35 of the 40 units are now brand new on the inside. And if you saw, if I showed you pictures, you would probably vomit of how horrible, horrible these places were.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:27:31–01:27:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that's our proposal to the board. If the board wants to consider that, we'll be more than happy to give them 120 days as long as they continue progress.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:06–01:28:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:50–01:28:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:54–01:29:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:29:04]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:04–01:29:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
code enforcement officer. I'm submitting a packet of documents ‸ and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of permit required, boarded up buildings, rental business tax receipt, and mass as supports. I visited the site three times and found no progress made to the property. I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of
[01:29:34]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:34–01:29:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:29:41]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:41–01:29:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
before the code enforcement board as the violations have not been fully resolved.
[01:29:48]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:29:48–01:29:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
certified and posted to the property in violation.
[01:29:56]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:56–01:30:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in violation and given 30 days to come into compliance or a fine of $100 be imposed each day that the violation remains until compliance is achieved. And I believe the realtor is here today.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:30:16–01:30:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:30:16]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:26–01:30:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:34–01:30:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We purchased the property in September, and it was in this condition. It was not boarded up. We had to board it up because vandals broke all the windows in the property, so we boarded it up. And you can see by the interior, that's exactly what the interior looked like when we bought it. We had, we just got permits to do all the plumbing. As soon as
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:31:17–01:31:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
could possibly do in accordance with the requirements as far as the permits go. I can't go any faster than the way it is. We had to have all the waste lines replumbed. We had to have all the plumbing done. The electrical is in place. So the new things that you had cited that were in the property. The previous owner had done all those things. And so what I've been trying to do is get contractors to come in, check the system, pull the ‸ permits so that we can get them inspected. And if there's any repairs that need to be done to do it at that time.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:32:02–01:32:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
plumbing and electrical. The AC as well. I also have an AC technician. Everybody is licensed. I don't have anybody on license working on the property. It's just ‸ the way we do it.
And we come in and ‸ I get licensed people to do everything. You can see this ‸ property was a total mess. ‸ This is a heck of a thing that we're trying to deal with.
quote for $15,000 to replace those windows. And those aren't new windows in there. And ‸ I know you said they were, but they're not. I was in there ‸ today and I looked at every single window and they're not new windows. They're old. They have tape on them from trying to seal it out. So we have to, I'm working right now on getting the window quote to get the windows replaced. My concern is that once we get those new windows in there, we're going to be fixing vandalism again.
get everything else completed in the property. And I know you had said when I spoke with you, we could board the inside. But that kind ‸ of defeats the purpose of putting in the new windows because they're still going to break them.
bought it as is. So he assumes responsibility. Right. So I would suggest that you get with the building inspector, Marco, and go over the work that has been done that requires a permit. Make sure you pull that. That will take care of that. He was concerned about the mass at the back of the house where the electrical box goes in in this picture.
That's why we're there. So you can rectify that easy. The permits that you already have open, the AC and all that, that's great. That's not what you're here for. I want you to focus on what's in front, not what you've done. Just get with him and he can show you what else you need and let you know what else you need.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:59–01:35:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Sounds like to me that she also needs a minimum of a residential contractor. She can't act as a contractor and have all those individual subs pulled.
And that was going to be my next point to you is instead of pulling all these individual permits, ‸ you should have gotten one contractor, pulled a renovation permit and just done the whole property.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:26–01:35:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:35:34–01:35:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Not the ones you already have, the ones you need. And get that done and then check that mass where the wires come into the house for the box. There's deficiencies there that need to be corrected.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:35:51–01:35:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Yeah. So there's issues with that. But I would get with your building inspector and cover that. So just whatever new permits and the mass, those are the two biggest ‸ ones.
supposed to be painted the same color as a house, not just raw wood. ‸ If you think it's going to take you 90 days to get the rest of this done, we can give you 90 days to get it taken care of. But I really think if you get with your building inspector, and like David said, it wouldn't be a bad idea to just get the one contractor and then lump everything in. I think this can actually easily be corrected. I don't think we need to be sitting here for six months talking about certain permits that were missed or what was done.
Because when he calls us and says, I'm not doing any inspections on the property because we have to cite you. So you really kind of need to get with him.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:36:57–01:36:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And get it done. So ‸ we can modify this to 90 days. I would also recommend that she takes Mr. Lightholders' advice and maybe looks for one contractor that can encompass the entire renovation. It would be much easier. But that's her decision and her prerogative. But this can all be taken care of quite easily.
I wasn't sure if someone was currently living in it or not. And the mailing address differs from the site address. So that indicated to me there was a rental property because it's not under.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:20–01:38:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:22–01:38:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So I would work on getting all your windows and stuff done in 90 days and getting that done. And then all of that would go away. Okay. I don't know where she's going to get windows in 90 days.
‸ They said deliveries to end of May. Everybody's like that right now. So unless she can buy it, if they're stock sizes, she may be able to buy it on depot.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:39:40–01:39:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:40:38]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[01:40:41]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:40:41–01:40:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Carver, Code Enforcement Officer, I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with
[01:40:48]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:40:48–01:40:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
depict the property during our visits. after my After our first inspection, I found the property in violation of storing outdoors. I ‸ visited the property twice and Gerald visited
[01:41:05]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:41:05–01:41:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
three times and found no progress made on the property. I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection on January 21st, 2021, the property remains in violation.
[01:41:19]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:41:19–01:41:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this case before the board as I have been unable to fully resolve the violations. I sent the notice of hearing on January 1st, 2021, and it was sent certified and posted to the property in violation. Staff recommends in case number 20-1137 that the owner be found in violation and given 30 days to come into
[01:41:47]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:41:47–01:41:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:42:02–01:42:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:42:02]Speaker 15 (name not verified) + overlapping voice
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:03–01:42:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:42:06]Speaker 15 (name not verified) + overlapping voice
he stated that he was going to try to speak to his father i never heard from the father um this morning when i drove by i saw them trying to load up the trailer
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:16–01:42:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:42:20]Speaker 15 (name not verified) + overlapping voice
anything so i believe they're trying to clean up the property as ‸ looks from it today because of the notice of hearing but I haven't seen much progress so
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:42:58–01:43:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:43:15–01:43:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:20–01:43:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:30–01:43:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that completes our active cases for tonight and brings us to non-compliance section. The first of those is CE20-1409.
[01:44:05]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
‸ property address is 712 South Wilson Avenue.
[01:44:08]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:08–01:44:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:44:10]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Enforcement Officer. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case.
[01:44:16]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:16–01:44:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:44:19]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
This case was brought before the Code
[01:44:21]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:21–01:44:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:44:25]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
violation of roofs and drainage section 6 1003 g Protective treatment section 6 1003 b I sent a notice of hearing for non-compliance on January 4th, 2020. and was sent certified and posted. At this time, the property remains in violation. And there is nobody here for tonight for the property.
[01:44:46]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:46–01:44:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:58–01:45:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:45:14]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
is 3645 Longbow Road.
[01:45:17]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:17–01:45:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:45:18]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Code Enforcement Officer, and I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photo isaccurately depict the property during my visits. This case was brought before the Code Enforcement Board on October
[01:45:31]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:31–01:45:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:45:32]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
2020. And ‸ was found in violation of
[01:45:35]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:35–01:45:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:45:44]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Appendix A, Article 15, Section 2A. I sent a notice of hearing for non-compliance on January 4th, 2020. It was sent certified and posted at the property. It remains in violation. And there is not anybody here for the property
[01:45:59]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:45:59–01:46:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:12–01:46:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:20–01:46:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:46:27]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:46:28]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Avenue.
[01:46:29]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:29–01:46:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:46:31]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Enforcement Officer. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. This case was brought before the Code
[01:46:41]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:41–01:46:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:46:44]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
violation of failure to secure, Section 6900 b7 roofs ‸ and drainage, Section 6 1003 g protective treatment, Section 6 1003 b accessory structure, Section 6 1001 g I sent a notice of hearing for non-compliance on January
[01:47:03]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:47:03–01:47:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:47:04]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
2020. It was sent certified and posted. At this time, the property remains in violation, and the property owner is not here this evening.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:47:16–01:47:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:47:44]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
address is 123 Factory Street.
[01:47:46]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:47:46–01:47:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:47:48]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Enforcement Officer. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. This case is brought before the Code Enforcement Board on September 17th and was found in violation of storing
[01:48:02]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:02–01:48:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:48:06]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
business tax receipt, Chapter 12, Section 12-1 a and B. I sent a notice of hearing for non-compliance on January 4th, and it was sent certified and posted on the property. At this time, the property remains in violation, and there's not anybody here to represent tonight.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:24–01:48:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:31–01:48:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:38–01:48:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:47–01:48:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:48:53]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:48:55]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:55–01:48:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:48:57]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Enforcement Officer. I am submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. This case was brought before the Code Enforcement Board on
[01:49:08]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:49:08–01:49:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:49:10]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and was found in violation of storing outdoors, Section 6900 b11 Boarded up buildings, Section 6900 b5 Windows, doors, and frames, Section 61003 m Protective treatment, Section 61003 b Roofs and drainage, Section 61003 g
[01:49:31]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:49:31–01:49:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:49:33]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Section 6900 b7 Permit required, Appendix A, Article 15, Section 2A. And sidewalks and driveways, Section 61001 c I sent a notice of hearing for non-compliance on January
[01:49:47]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:49:47–01:49:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:49:47]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
2020, or 2021. And it was sent certified and posted. At this time, the property remains in violation. And there is nobody here to represent the property this evening
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:09–01:50:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:14–01:50:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:30–01:50:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:50:35]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[01:50:38]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Drive. For the record, I'm Steve Murdoch, Code Enforcement Officer. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits.
[01:50:49]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:50:49–01:50:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:50:54]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
found in violation of storing outdoors, Section 6900 b11 accessory structures, Section 61001 g boarded up buildings, Section 6900 b5 and accumulation of trash and litter, Section
[01:51:09]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:09–01:51:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:51:11]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I sent a notice of hearing for non-compliance on January
[01:51:15]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:15–01:51:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:51:15]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
2021, and it was sent certified and posted. At this time, the property remains in violation, and there's nobody here to represent tonight.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:53–01:51:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:52:00]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the record I'm Steve Murdoch code enforcement officer and I'm submitting the packet of documents and photos associated with this case. These photos accurately depict the property during my visits.
[01:52:08]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:52:08–01:52:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:52:13]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
found in 2020 and was found in violation of boarded up buildings section 6900 B5 parking in yard section 6900 B9 protective
[01:52:23]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:52:23–01:52:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:52:27]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
junk or autos section 6902 B1 and 2 I sent notice of
[01:52:32]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:52:32–01:52:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:52:36]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and posted on the property. At this time, the property remains in violation and the property
[01:52:41]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:52:41–01:52:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:52:52–01:52:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Donna Avenue what violations are we here for today though
[01:52:59]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
‸ being as it was found in violation of all of these, even though you've made some corrections, you're not there yet.
[01:53:05]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:53:05–01:53:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:53:08]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
complied. Okay, so these are
[01:53:10]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:53:10–01:53:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
there's nothing visible from the road I mean I'm not understanding why we can't just close the case today. The
[01:53:27]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
storage of the vehicles in the backyard are still
[01:53:29]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:53:29–01:53:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:53:33–01:53:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:53:38–01:53:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
even on that picture you came by today and took another one. so Yeah,
[01:53:41]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
it was those pictures weren't able to
[01:53:43]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:53:43–01:53:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:53:46]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
that was this morning then I
[01:53:48]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:53:48–01:53:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:53:52]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
been made by that time but that car is in fact gone as well
[01:53:55]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:53:55–01:53:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
nothing you stand from there you can't see anything I mean I I would just want to close the case today that's that's why I'm here well
[01:54:06]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
as we spoke about the cars in the back they have to be physically gone they can't be I can still see the blue tarps where you put the blue tarps and covered them up. So if they're completely invisible, if they're gone, they're not visible anymore, that's that's different but because I've seen those cars there and they're there as we discussed I have to see those cars move they have to be gone so once ‸ that's the only
[01:54:32]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
up
[01:54:32]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:54:32–01:54:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:54:44–01:54:44 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:54:54–01:54:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:55:01–01:55:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
module and I mean I don't have the money right now to do ‸ anything the car I mean obviously I'm not going to scrap it I mean it's not visible from the from the road at all I mean there's a tarp over it but I mean who's to say that ‸ could be my four-wheelers back there but regardless ‸ I can't do anything right now
I'm electrician between getting materials for jobs and everything we've done put off del taco job we everything right now I mean I'm I'm dead in water so I mean I ‸ don't really know what y'all want me to do be it's all clean I mean there's a picture right there I mean it's done
And if the vote is to find you non-compliant at that at some point in the future when those cars are gone, then ‸ you can come back and ask us to relieve you of the of the debt. Okay,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:56:08–01:56:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:56:10–01:56:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
unfortunately the code doesn't work that way and we're not here as I said earlier we're not here to be punitive. We're not here to take money whether you have it or not we're here just to get the city to be the best it can be and with with that I'll take a motion
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:56:39–01:56:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:56:47–01:57:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:57:30–01:57:30 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:57:45–01:57:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:58:11–01:58:11 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:58:16–01:58:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:58:49–01:58:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:59:02–01:59:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
days to get rid of those vehicles or a vehicle, whatever's back there and if when that's done call officer Murdoch and let him know so he ‸ clear the case
February 18th is the next board so that's what you would be tabled to okay um I do want to clarify for the record, if he is in compliance, are we closing the case with no fine? Because essentially his corrected date was in November so if it's the direction of the board They
have not changed the compliance date. So they are simply tabling the case, meaning that today hasn't really happened. ‸ They're moving today to next month. So they're bringing the compliance hearing back to next month. So that hasn't changed the compliance date, really. It's up to code enforcement staff to decide to bring it back if they want to next month. If they choose to go ahead and clear the case, then they don't need to bring it back to the board. Right. so But if not,
it's table till next hearing, and then it'll be addressed at that time and the board can find them in compliance and go from there I just wanted to clarify that for the record to make sure we will on the same page
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:00:28–02:00:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:00:30–02:00:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:00:35–02:00:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for the record I'm Katie Carver code enforcement officer I'm submitting photos that I took during my re-inspection of the property they accurately show the addition of the property at the time the case was brought
[02:01:08]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:01:08–02:01:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
2020, and was found in violation of exterior general condition, weeds, accessory structures, storing junk or
[02:01:20]Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Machine re-recognized
autos,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:01:20–02:01:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
and storing outdoors ‸ this case was ordered by the board to comply by December 19th 2020 I sent the notice of hearing for non-compliance on January 4th 2021, and it sent certified and posted. At this time, the property remains in violation.
[02:02:01]Speaker 22 (introduced as “Daniel Austin” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
[address]
[02:02:02]Speaker 22 (introduced as “Daniel Austin” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:02:02–02:02:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:02:04]Speaker 22 (introduced as “Daniel Austin” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and from the picture taken today, it appears that you have not.
[02:02:24]Speaker 22 (introduced as “Daniel Austin” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the person that I hired to do that um
[02:02:28]Speaker 22 (introduced as “Daniel Austin” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:02:28–02:02:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:02:30]Speaker 22 (introduced as “Daniel Austin” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
they wanted the shed taken down I took the shed down and when he put that on there out there like that I called him up and told him that could not be And he told me that he was going to go back over there and take that stuff away from there.
[02:02:46]Speaker 22 (introduced as “Daniel Austin” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:02:46–02:02:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:02:49]Speaker 22 (introduced as “Daniel Austin” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
but I paid someone to have that debris all moved away And that was today, today and yesterday, because there was more out there was yesterday.
has been no, no change in the property. ‸ The stuff he's referring to that he's telling you today is actually new stuff that has been added since the last hearing. ‸ But the main thing we're concerned with is the condition of the front of the house where it was hit getting fixed is
because the load-bearing beam on the corner is completely destroyed. it is posted all over Katie puts out the police tape to try to keep people away So that's one part of the violation
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:03:52–02:03:52 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:04:12–02:04:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:04:27–02:04:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:04:38–02:04:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:05:22–02:05:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
said if you have any questions, you know how to get in touch with us. You can get in touch with us. We'll be happy to answer them. Come by. Yes, we'll come by the station. I'll be happy to go over it with ‸ you
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:06:04–02:06:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
make this meeting at this time. So I would like to hear it because, as his lien application shows, he's asking for the same amount as our cost sheet, and he's in full agreement of city's cost.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:06:51–02:07:09 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[02:07:40]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
and we'll agree to it.
[02:07:40]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks; the machine readings disagree here · 02:07:40–02:07:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 02:07:51–02:07:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:07:54]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
90 cents. Yeah,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:07:54–02:07:55 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[02:07:55]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:07:55–02:07:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; part of a long flagged stretch · 02:08:06–02:08:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:08:10–02:08:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:28–02:08:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:08:32]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:32–02:08:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:08:36]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:36–02:08:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:08:40]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:08:40–02:08:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:08:51]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
weeds, protective treatment, and roofs and drainage The Code Enforcement Board provided the owner sufficient time to correct the said violations. Therefore, consistent with the Code Enforcement Board's order, a lien was recorded against the property, effective November 15th 2018 ‸ lien ran at $100 per day from july July 16, 2018, until compliance was achieved on april
[02:09:19]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:09:19–02:09:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:09:21]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
19, 2019.
[02:09:22]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:09:22–02:09:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:09:24]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and
[02:09:25]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:09:25–02:09:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:09:29]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
or less due to the fact that he was selling the property Staff utilized the following factors in making recommendations to reduce the lien. Whether the current owner owned the property at the time of the violations occurred? yes The number of violations related to the subject lien was 3. The number of inspections formed was 20. The length of time the property was in violation was 277 days. Were there current or previous code violations? yes property taxes 2020 are current, with no outstanding tax bills. other liens Records show no outstanding liens on the property and no water liens. on property
[02:10:14]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:10:14–02:10:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:10:17]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
2021 the property was in compliance before the Code Enforcement Board hearing. An inspection will occur prior to the council meeting. the current market value of the subject property and
[02:10:29]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:10:29–02:10:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:10:33]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
according to the Brevard County property appraiser
[02:10:37]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:10:37–02:10:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:10:43]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:10:43–02:10:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:10:58]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I have the total lien cost on the sheet What's the city cost?
[02:11:09]Speaker 16 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:11:09–02:11:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:11:23–02:11:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:11:48–02:11:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:12:07–02:12:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:12:15–02:12:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:12:17–02:12:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
yes I was in violation There's no question about that. and the reason I got there I don't think any of you folks here were on this board when I purchased that property and I want to bring you up to date on what kind of condition the property was in when I purchased it
anyway the property was the customers were complaining because it was a drug haven and prostitution And it was very unsafe because it had sewage running above the ground because of bad plumbing. And the owners were and really out of compliance of everything. And they went into foreclosure. I bought it out of foreclosure and at
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:13:23–02:13:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
me and a partner bought the property. and we started immediately We got a permit to start the demolition and cleaning the place up. Everybody was very happy at the city that we were doing it.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:14:07–02:14:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording