civic record · cocoa, florida
Board of Adjustment

Board of Adjustment Meeting

Date
2025-07-16
Status
Draft minutes and machine transcript available
Source
CivicClerk event #114
Built from draft minutes printed in an agenda packet — no AI-written text Briefing final

The City's record

What the City's record shows

Draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-09-17, pp. 8–11; approved as written by the Board of Adjustment according to the draft minutes of 2025-09-17, whose own approval is recorded in later draft minutes but not yet confirmed in the City's approved minutes. The City has not posted the approved minutes as a separate file. The approving motion, “to approve the July 16, 2025 Regular Meeting Minutes as written”, is in the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-11-19 agenda packet (2076_11_19_2025_BOA.pdf, packet pp. 8–10).

Built only from this meeting's draft minutes (2006_Full_Agenda.pdf, packet pp. 8–11). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.

Attendance (the roll call)

  • Listed present when the roll was taken: Robert Butler, Robert Dyar, Jennifer Moton, Margaret Goudelock
  • (Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
  • Listed absent: Dan Quattrocchi, Pam Shaia, Jose Pacheco
  • Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Kristin Eick (Assistant City Attorney), Jennifer Webster (City Planner), Luci Ribeiro (City Planner), Stockton Whitten (City Manager), Breanna Earley (Recording Secretary)
  • Named on at least one ballot later in the meeting: Butler, Dyar, Goudelock, Moton (participation, which can differ from the roll: arrivals and departures are in the minutes' text)

Adopted actions (3)

  • to approve the July 16, 2025, Regular M eeting Agenda as written and the May 21, 2025 Regular Meeting Minutes as written (moved by Dyar, seconded by Goudelock); PASSED 4-0; ayes: Dyar, Butler, Moton, Goudelock; nays: none — the draft minutes, packet pp. 8–11
  • to approve the Special Exception with conditions of approval recommended by staff and to adopt the written findings included in the staff report (moved by Dyar, seconded by Moton); PASSED 4-0; ayes: Dyar, Butler, Moton, Goudelock; nays: none — the draft minutes, packet pp. 8–11
  • to adjourn the July 16, 2025, meeting (moved by Dyar, seconded by Goudelock); PASSED 4-0; ayes: Dyar, Butler, Moton, Goudelock; nays: none — the draft minutes, packet pp. 8–11

Draft minutes, as printed in a later agenda packet

Draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-09-17, pp. 8–11; approved as written by the Board of Adjustment according to the draft minutes of 2025-09-17, whose own approval is recorded in later draft minutes but not yet confirmed in the City's approved minutes. The City has not posted the approved minutes as a separate file.

Source: 2006_Full_Agenda.pdf, the agenda packet of the 2025-09-17 meeting, packet pp. 8–11; lines 224–381 of the City's text of that file. The packet's own page footers are left out below.

Read the draft minutes 
MEETING MINUTES 
July 16, 2025 
 
 
A Regular meeting of the Board  of Adjustment of the City of Cocoa  was held on Wednesday , 
July 16, 2025 in the Council Chambers at 65 Stone Street, Cocoa, as publicly noticed. 
 
I. OPENING MATTERS: 
 
Vice Chair Butler called the meeting to order at 6:00 pm. 
 
The Recording Secretary called the roll. 
 
ROLL CALL: 
 
Dan Quattrocchi  Chairperson 
Robert Butler   Vice Chair  
Robert Dyar   Board Member 
  Pam Shaia    Board Member  
Jose Pacheco                           Board Member 
Jennifer Moton  Board Member 
Margaret Goudelock  Board Member 
 
MEMBERS PRESENT: 
 
Robert Butler                          Vice Chair  
Robert Dyar                            Board Member 
  Jennifer Moton           Board Member 
  Margaret Goudelock  Board Member 
 
MEMBERS ABSENT: 
   
  Dan Quattrocchi  Chairperson 
  Pam Shaia    Board Member 
  Jose Pacheco    Board Member 
 
OTHERS PRESENT: 
 
Kristin Eick Assistant City Attorney  
Jennifer Webster City Planner 
Luci Ribeiro City Planner 
Stockton Whitten City Manager 
Breanna Earley Recording Secretary 


Board of Adjustment 
Meeting Minutes 
July 16, 2025 
Page 2 
 
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND MINUTES: 
AGENDA: Regular Meeting of July 16, 2025  
MINUTES: Regular Meeting of May 21, 2025 
  
Motion by Board Member Dyar; Seconded by  Board Member Goudelock  to 
approve the July 16, 2025, Regular M eeting Agenda as written and the May 21, 
2025 Regular Meeting Minutes as written. 
 
Ayes: Dyar, Butler, Moton, Goudelock 
 
Motion Passed Unanimously (4-0). 
 
II. OLD BUSINESS:  None 
III. NEW BUSINESS: 
A. PZ 25-00000004 (Special Exception Tax Parcel ID No. 24-35-12-00-762) 
 
Consideration of a Special Exception request to allow for a principal structure in excess 
of 60 feet in height in the M -2 (Manufacturing and Industrial) Zoning District , pursuant 
to Appendix A, Zoning, Article XI, Section 19 (C)(1) of the City of Cocoa Code  of 
Ordinances. The structure is intended to be a tower approximately 185 feet in height.  
The subject property is located on Grissom Parkway in Cocoa, Florida. Tax Parcel ID: 
24-35-12-00-762. 
 
Jennifer Webster, City Planner, presented a PowerPoint for Special Exception Tax Parcel 
ID No. 24-35-12-00-762.
1 
 
Isabella Albert, Halff Associates, provided a PowerPoint presentation 2 and expanded on 
staff’s presentation. 
 
Board member Moton asked if the employment opportunities mentioned would be local. 
 
Ms. Albert stated most would be local. 
 
Board member Dyar asked what the expected number of local employment would be. 
 
Ms. Albert stated 20 to 25 people onsite. 
 
Board member Dyar asked what the land use directly to the east of the site is. 
 
Ms. Webster stated it’s industrial. 
 
 
1 Special Exception Tax Parcel ID No. 24-35-12-00-762 PowerPoint Presentation 
2 Special Exception Tax Parcel ID No. 24-35-12-00-762 Applicant PowerPoint Presentation 


Board of Adjustment 
Meeting Minutes 
July 16, 2025 
Page 3 
 
Board member Dyar asked when the real project name will be revealed. 
 
Ms. Webster stated it would be contingent on the approval of the height of the tower. 
 
Board member Dyar asked for clarification. 
 
Ms. Webster stated that as it works its way through the approval process, more det ail will 
be in the development agreement. 
 
City Attorney Eick stated the statute does provide confidentially for up to 12 months. 
There is also a process for additional time, if requested. Once they have closed on the 
land, the project name will be revealed.  
 
Board member Dyar  just wanted to ensure in the planning and city process more detail 
would be revealed. 
 
Board member Butler asked what the cooling tower is for. 
 
Ms. Albert stated it was for a gas supplier. 
 
Motion by Board member Dyar; Seconded by Board member Moton to approve the 
Special Exception with  conditions of approval  recommended by staff  and to adopt 
the written findings included in the staff report. 
 
Ayes: Dyar, Butler, Moton, Goudelock 
 
Motion Passed Unanimously (4-0). 
 
IV. OTHER BUSINESS:   
V. NEXT MEETING DATE:   August 20, 2025, at 6:00 pm at 65 Stone Street, Cocoa, FL.  
VI. ADJOURNMENT 
Motion by Board member Dyar; Seconded by Board member Goudelock to adjourn 
the July 16, 2025, meeting. 
 
Ayes: Dyar, Butler, Moton, Goudelock 
 
Motion Passed Unanimously (4-0) 
 
There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 6:23 P.M. 
 
 
 
 


Board of Adjustment 
Meeting Minutes 
July 16, 2025 
Page 4 
 
 ______________________________________ 
 Dan Quattrocchi, Chairperson 
 
 
 ______________________________________ 
 Breanna Earley, Recording Secretary

Agenda (the City's wording)

No time links are shown for this meeting.

An item without a time link may still have been discussed; the link is only added when the automatic match is strong.

I. Opening Matters

  • 1. Invocation
  • 2. Pledge of Allegiance
  • 3. Roll Call

II. Approval of Agenda and Minutes

  • 1. Agenda: Regular Meeting of July 16, 2025.
  • 2. Minutes: Regular Meeting of May 21, 2025.

III. Old Business

IV. New Business

  • 1. PZ 25-00000004: Special Exception Tax Parcel ID No. 24-35-12-00-762

V. Other Business

VI. Next Meeting Date

VII. Adjournment

Transcript Partial transcript

Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard. It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's minutes do that (above). A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. “▶ Play” opens the recording at that moment, as the City's file, in a new tab.

Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.

[00:00:13] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:13–00:00:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:28] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 00:00:28–00:00:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:29] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:00:30] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:30–00:00:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:31] ▶ Play Speaker 2
Oh, he's not coming.
[00:00:35] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:35–00:00:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:46] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:00:52] ▶ Play Speaker 2
Vice Chair Butler.
[00:00:54] ▶ Play Speaker 1
Here.
[00:00:55] ▶ Play Speaker 2
Board Member Dyer.
[00:00:56] ▶ Play Speaker 3
Present.
[00:00:57] ▶ Play Speaker 2
Board Member Moten.
[00:00:59] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:59–00:00:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:00] ▶ Play No voice detected
Present.
[00:01:00] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:00–00:01:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:02] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:01:05] ▶ Play Speaker 2
And Board Attorney. ‸ Here.
[00:01:08] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:08–00:01:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:11] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[00:01:16] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:12 ▶]
[00:01:28] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:01:29] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:01:42] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[00:01:47] ▶ Play Speaker 1
Yes. Do we have a motion to approve the minutes?
[00:01:53] ▶ Play Speaker 3
Move to approve the minutes.
[00:01:55] ▶ Play Speaker 1
‸ Second. Second. All in favor? Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Minutes? Minutes? May 21st.
[00:02:05] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:05–00:02:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:05] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[00:02:08] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:02:09] ▶ Play Speaker 1
business?
[00:02:10] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain
We
[00:02:10] ▶ Play Speaker 1
have none. And then you want to present the...
[00:02:16] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Yes. Good evening, board members. I'm Jen Webster, a city planner here at the city of Cocoa. And this evening we have a special exception request for a structure exceeding 60 feet in height in the M2 zoning district. So, just as a review of the powers and duties of the BOA, per article 17 section 2 and special exceptions, before any special exception is issued, the Board of Adjustment shall determine if the request is compliant with a criteria governing special exceptions and that satisfactory provisions have ‸ been made concerning this criteria. In granting any special exception, the board may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards in conformity with the city code. Now, generally, when there is a request for an increase in height requirements for a structure, it would be considered a variance. However, per code in the M2 zoning district, a request to increase the height of a structure above 60 feet is considered a special exception. So, the requested action tonight is that the staff request the Board of Adjustment approve a request for a special exception to allow for a principal structure in excess of 60 feet in height in the M2 manufacturing and industrial zoning district, ‸ pursuant to Appendix A zoning article 11 section 19
[00:03:37] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:37–00:03:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:40] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain
code
[00:03:40] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:03:41] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
certain conditions of approval and to adopt the staff findings included in the staff report. The structure is intended to be a tower approximately 185 feet in height.
[00:03:53] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:53–00:04:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:01] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Tampa, Florida and she is here in the audience this evening to answer any questions following this presentation. So,
[00:04:09] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:09–00:04:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:14] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
under Florida Statute Chapter 288.075. And this statute is regarding commercial development and capital improvements, which governs the confidentiality of records held by economic development agencies of Florida. The statute aims to balance the public's right to access in government records with the need to protect sensitive business information during economic development negotiations. So, this is the development will be ‸ a future industrial processing facility, which is a permitted use in the M2 zoning district. And the tower is a crucial component to their operations. And so, the applicant is requesting the special exception approval prior to site development approval in order to move forward.
[00:05:02] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:02–00:05:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:09] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
width and depth, 185 feet tall.
[00:05:12] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:12–00:05:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:17] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
example picture on the right. It's a ‸ storage box called a cold box and there are no emissions from the tower. The facility will be a 24-7 operation and there will be a development agreement with Project Andromeda subject to planning and zoning and city council approval. So, with regard to the DA, given the distinct nature of the Andromeda project and its impacts to a major transportation corridor, the city wants to preserve the visual and functional character of the property through on-site beautification. So, the city intends to enter into a development agreement with Project Andromeda that will be brought before the planning and zoning board and city council, ensuring Project Andromeda will ‸ identify and mitigate impacts to surrounding areas and transportation corridors, which will directly aid in improving connectivity, safety, and aesthetics in the surrounding area and the city. So, the project site is located off of Grissom Parkway, just north of State Road 528 and just west of East Industry Road.
[00:06:24] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:24–00:06:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:33] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
is vacant at the time. And the surrounding future land use is manufacturing and industrial. However, just south of State Road 528, we have some residential subdivisions and some serious apartments and a shopping center.
[00:06:49] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:49–00:06:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:54] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
like illuminated in the evening, and also what it would look like in the daytime.
[00:07:01] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:01–00:07:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:08] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
development will be placed at the northern portion of the site.
[00:07:13] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:13–00:07:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:20] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
where the tower will be located and in proportion to the rest of the development. And the applicant also provided a graphic showing the relationship of the proposed development to the site itself with regard to the buffers.
[00:07:40] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:40–00:07:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:44] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
as one of the conditions for them to provide at least a 300 foot tree preservation buffer to ‸ buffer the tower visual.
[00:07:54] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:07:54–00:07:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:56] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:07:56] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
And there is already approximately ‸ 75 foot buffer from the road right away lines to the property line
[00:08:03] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:03–00:08:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:09] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
And this graphic is the the the applicant actually provided a line of sight diagram and this shows right here the perspective of the line of sight which is from the neighborhood to the south across 528 to the tower at the proposed facility. And so here's the line of sight diagram showing on the right side the perspective from like the homeowner or someone standing by the residential home looking across 528 to the tower. And right there you can see that there are there's a buffer of trees that are approximately 30 to 40 feet in height actually buffering the tower visually. And there are already structures in the manufacturing and industrial district that are taller than 60 feet. And so one example is the the assembly building at 850 Sidco Road and also ‸ communications tower also on Sidco Road.
[00:09:14] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:14–00:09:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:18] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
in the manufacturing district and then downtown closer to downtown you have the communications tower there in the village.
[00:09:27] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:27–00:09:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:27] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[00:09:30] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
the of course the cocoa water tower and all of these range in height from 120 feet to 260 feet.
[00:09:39] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:39–00:09:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:43] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
the special exception request according to the criteria and appendix a zoning article 17 section 2 regarding ingress and egress and parking refuse and utilities screening and buffering lighting landscape yards and open space height requirements renewal and termination dates
[00:10:00] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:00–00:10:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:04] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
And staff concluded the following that overall the proposed development is consistent and compatible with surrounding uses it involves an industrial processing use which is a principle permitted use within the M2 zoning district
[00:10:18] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:18–00:10:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:19] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
meet all applicable development regulations special exception request pertains solely to the height increase up to a maximum of 185 feet for the cooling tower crucial to supporting the primary operation. All other proposed structures will not exceed 60 feet. This is anticipated that the future development will create employment opportunities and contribute to the property tax base.
[00:10:43] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:43–00:10:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:46] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
for appendix a zoning article 17 section 2b of the city zoning code and as of the date of this hearing this evening there were no objections or concerns that have been received in response to the proposed special exception. So finally the staff request the board of adjustment approve this request for a special exception to allow for principal structure in excess of 60 feet in height and M2 manufacturing and industrial zoning district pursuant to appendix a zoning article 11 section 19 C 1 of the city of cocoa code of ordinances subject to certain conditions of approval and to adopt the staff findings included in the staff report. The structure is intended to be a tower approximately 185 ‸ in height and the
[00:11:33] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:33–00:11:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:36] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
tax parcel ID 2435 12 00 762. And the conditions the recommended conditions of approval are that the special exception shall not be effective until the development agreement and conceptual site plan have been received approval from the planning and zoning board and city council and that the applicant has secured all the permits and approvals necessary for any development related to the special exception including large scale site plan approval.
[00:12:06] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
Such agreements and permits shall be obtained within two years of the board's approval. And if the tower is extended
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:12:06–00:12:13 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:12:13] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:12:13–00:12:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:13] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
or expanded a special exception approval shall be required. And the height of the proposed tower shall be no more than 180 feet including any and all appurtenances such as but not limited to antennas, railings, or access stairwells. The tower shall be no more than approximately 12 foot by 16 foot in width and depth and shall be painted white. The
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:12:13–00:12:35 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:12:35] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:35–00:12:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:37] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
the project shall include a tree preservation buffer on the south end of the property which shall be no less than approximately 300 feet in depth and any other conditions deemed necessary by the board of adjustment.
[00:12:54] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:54–00:12:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:55] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:12:55] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:12:55] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:12:55] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:12:56] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
to answer any questions you may have believe they have a presentation as well.
[00:13:03] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:03–00:13:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:05] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:13:06] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:03–00:13:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:08] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:13:08] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:13:12] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:12–00:13:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:15] ▶ Play Speaker 2
nothing but the truth? I
[00:13:16] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
do. Thank you.
[00:13:28] ▶ Play Speaker 6
Thank you. Staff did an excellent job with the presentation. So I'm going to not have a huge presentation that I was planning. But
[00:13:36] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:36–00:13:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:43] ▶ Play Speaker 6
Actually this this graphic in their staff report,
[00:13:46] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:46–00:13:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:50] ▶ Play Speaker 6
and it does not 300 feet is where we show it
[00:13:52] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized
so our
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:52–00:13:53 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:13:53] ▶ Play Speaker 6
development is even further beyond that. So I just wanted to clarify that as well and also clarify the lighting of the towers just for safety of the stairway, the staircase. And I also I just wanted to make sure that the conditions includes the 85 feet.
[00:14:12] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain
I
[00:14:12] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
think he's only said 180 feet.
[00:14:13] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain
Yes,
[00:14:13] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I was
[00:14:13] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
going to go back
[00:14:14] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:14:14–00:14:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:15] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Thank you.
[00:14:17] ▶ Play Speaker 6
But again, this is the the sight line. The applicant made sure that the development is going to be occurring further north of the property, respect of the residents on the other side of the highway.
[00:14:29] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:29–00:14:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:35] ▶ Play Speaker 6
And I'm here if you have any questions as well as the team.
[00:14:49] ▶ Play Speaker 4
I have a question. I saw that it was offering local, I'm sorry, employment opportunities
[00:15:00] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Machine re-recognized
will
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:15:00–00:15:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:15:00] ▶ Play Speaker 4
the unemployment opportunities be local. One moment, please.
[00:15:13] ▶ Play Speaker 6
It will be mostly local.
[00:15:17] ▶ Play Speaker 3
Is there an expected number of local employment?
[00:15:35] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:15:35–00:15:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:37] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]
[00:15:47] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[00:15:57] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:57–00:16:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:03] ▶ Play Speaker 4
around the clock or?
[00:16:06] ▶ Play Speaker 6
I don't think so. No, it's definitely what
[00:16:08] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:08–00:16:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:12] ▶ Play Speaker 6
It's just the operation of that. Yes.
[00:16:19] ▶ Play Speaker 3
This might be a question for staff. What's the land use directly to the I believe it's the east of this location?
[00:16:25] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:25–00:16:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:32] ▶ Play Speaker 6
Yeah, the whole area north of the highway, as you can see in
[00:16:35] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized
gray
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:35–00:16:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:16:36] ▶ Play Speaker 6
it's all industrial and it's all M2.
[00:16:39] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
This is just a question for my curiosity because this is the first time we've had a project come through with sufficient information for my curiosity, I would say.
[00:16:52] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:52–00:16:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:58] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
When do we hear what this proposed property is to be utilized for specifically?
[00:17:02] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
So, so the the the ability or the desire to move forward with development plan approval is contingent on getting approval for the height of the tower. So as soon if if if the board chooses to approve the tower this the height of the tower this evening upon our recommendation, then they will be able to move forward with their with their site plan and and it will have to go before the planning and zoning board and city council with a development agreement, which maybe the applicant can answer that we'll be able to provide more detail about the business at that time. Right. Yes. Okay. Yeah.
[00:17:48] ▶ Play Speaker 3
Just yeah, let me let me
[00:17:50] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:50–00:17:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:54] ▶ Play Speaker 3
and zoning in the city meeting? They will be presenting the corporation or organization that will be occupying that space.
[00:18:01] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:18:01–00:18:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:07] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
[00:18:15] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:18:15–00:18:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:16] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
what the description of the business and what kind of arrangements or provisions they're going to provide to the site and potentially surrounding corridor. So there will have to be more detail in the development agreement.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:18:15–00:18:36 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:18:33] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized
And also once they close on the land, the name
[00:18:36] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:18:36–00:18:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:37] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized
to be released. Got it. Makes sense.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:18:36–00:18:45 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:18:40] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
And I just want to reiterate just real quick, and I know there's a lot of curiosity
[00:18:45] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:18:45–00:18:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:46] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
about the facility itself, but just to reiterate that we're just asking for approval of the height extension of the tower and I do also want to go back and clarify in the conditions and we'll we'll correct this for the documentation that it's for ‸ 185 foot tower so I apologize if there was a typo in the presentation
[00:19:07] ▶ Play Speaker 7
and mr. Dyer the statute does provide for confidentiality up to 12 months. And then there is a process for additional time if requested. So just so you understand that there is the statute does provide an actual number of months where they can have that. Basically, the project name is what we utilize but as I said what if they're going to close on the land once they close on that, you know, that becomes known at
[00:19:43] ▶ Play Speaker 3
that point. Understood. ‸ My the the main purpose of my question is that at some point the public will have a chance to understand what is being placed in this location and they'll be able to voice if they have concerns or they can cheer it on if they're excited about it. So at some point in the planning and city process,
[00:20:00] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized
we'll we'll
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:20:00–00:20:01 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:20:01] ▶ Play Speaker 3
have that opportunity. Okay.
[00:20:04] ▶ Play Speaker 1
Well, that's kind of what I'm kind of confused it's a cooling tower but for what what ‸ purpose is this facility for unless I'm missing something well
[00:20:14] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
it's just a it's for a gas supplier. Gas ‸ cooling town Yes.
[00:20:32] ▶ Play Speaker 1
Any other questions from the board? No further questions for me. Is everybody else here to speak? come on
[00:20:42] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
behalf?
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:20:42–00:20:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:20:42] ▶ Play Speaker 1
I
[00:20:43] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
don't believe there are any other I
[00:20:45] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:45–00:20:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:48] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
anyone wishes to speak on the
[00:20:50] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:12 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:50–00:21:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:02] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[00:21:04] ▶ Play Speaker 1
Do we have a motion to approve the the tower with the city's uh special exceptions and the change to the
[00:21:15] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:15–00:21:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:18] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
[00:21:24] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:21:25] ▶ Play Speaker 3
approve I'm just I was trying to look for the language to make sure I get that correct so you can guide me through it if you want but I'll make a move to approve
[00:21:32] ▶ Play Speaker 7
yes so the if I could suggest that it would be the motion would be to approve with the conditions of approval recommended by staff and to adopt the written findings included in the staff report.
[00:21:48] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:48–00:21:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:50] ▶ Play Speaker 3
‸ quickly to be honest I move to approve with the condition I move to approve the special exemption with the conditions laid out by the city staff with the written
[00:22:06] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:22:06–00:22:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:08] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[00:22:11] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[00:22:14] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:14–00:22:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:15] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:11 ▶]
[00:22:28] ▶ Play Speaker 1
Any other business that we
[00:22:30] ▶ Play Speaker 4
have
[00:22:33] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice
I'll just
[00:22:34] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
know
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:22:34–00:22:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:22:34] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I don't believe the board ‸ made a motion to approve the agenda It's a little late now but if you would like to do that
[00:22:43] ▶ Play Speaker 1
It's been a while so I'm a little
[00:22:45] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:22:45–00:22:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:49] ▶ Play Speaker 1
Do I need to do that now?
[00:22:52] ▶ Play Speaker 7
It would be helpful for the record
[00:22:54] ▶ Play Speaker 1
What's that?
[00:22:55] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:55–00:22:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:57] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:22:57] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:22:59] ▶ Play Speaker 3
the agenda ‸ Do
[00:23:00] ▶ Play Speaker 1
I have a second?
[00:23:01] ▶ Play No voice detected
Second
[00:23:01] ▶ Play Speaker 1
All in favor?
[00:23:03] ▶ Play Speaker 3
Aye
[00:23:03] ▶ Play Speaker 1
Any opposed? The agenda is approved Next meeting date
[00:23:17] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:17–00:23:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:25] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
13th No, pardon me. That will be August 20th
[00:23:31] ▶ Play Speaker 4
Okay
[00:23:32] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:32–00:23:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:41] ▶ Play Speaker 1
Okay We Turn the meeting it. Oh, I need a motion to adjourn the meeting
[00:23:49] ▶ Play Speaker 3
Move to adjourn the meeting
[00:23:50] ▶ Play Speaker 1
Second
[00:23:52] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:52–00:23:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:52] ▶ Play Speaker 1
All in favor Aye Any opposed? He's adjourned
[00:24:00] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Thank you so much
[00:24:02] ▶ Play Speaker 5 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:02–00:24:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:02] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:24:03] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:24:05] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:24:07] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[00:24:08] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:24:09] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[00:24:13] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:24:13] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
[00:24:19] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice
Air Force And SpaceX Because they're building
[00:24:25] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:25–00:24:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:27] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:27–00:24:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

Transcript revision built 2026-10-27T13:16:27 · 2,255 ordinary words, 665 in suspect passages, 160 machine re-recognized.

Ask about this meeting

Use the search to ask a question about this meeting in particular, or compare it across other meetings in the archive.