Built from the City's minutes records — no AI-written textBriefing final
The City's record
What the City's record shows
Built only from the City's minutes (1487_CE_Reg_Minutes_02_16_2023.pdf). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.
Attendance (the roll call)
Listed present when the roll was taken: Lloyd Roberts, George Brown, Michael Simpson, Chris Davis, Verna Hughes, David Lightholder, Sharri Scott, Aurora Ramirez, Josue Otero
(Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
Listed absent: none (the minutes record no absences)
Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Dennis Bunt (Code Enforcement Manager), Ellison Gaulding (Police Officer), Augusto Gonzalez-Ruiz (Code Enforcement Officer), Vince Buonocore (Code Enforcement Officer), Michael Folger (Code Enforcement Officer), Debra Babb-Nutcher (Board Attorney), Darla Crowl (Recording Secretary)
Named on at least one ballot later in the meeting: Davis, Simpson (participation, which can differ from the roll: arrivals and departures are in the minutes' text)
Adopted actions (16)
to approve to the agenda of February 16, 2023 (moved by Brown, seconded by Davis); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 1
to approve to the minutes of January 19, 2023 (moved by Brown, seconded by Simpson); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 2
to amend Staff's recommendation and give the property owner until May 20, 2023 (90 days) and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Lightholder, seconded by Scott); CARRIED 5-1 (result not printed; worked out from the count); ayes: not named in the minutes; nays: Davis — the City's minutes, p. 3 Corrected to match the minutes, page 3.
to amend Staffs recommendation and give the property owner until August 15, 2023 (180 days) for the Roofs & Drainage, Ch 6 Sec. 6-1003 (g) one hundred dollars ($100.00) per days with 30 day updates and approve Staffs recommendation and give the property owner until March 18, 2023 for the other 3 … (moved by Davis, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
to amend Staffs recommendation and give the property owner until March 3, 2023 (15 days) and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Scott, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 4
to amend Staffs recommendation and give the property owner until August 15, 2023 (180 days) a fine of fifty dollars ($50.00) per day and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Scott, seconded by Brown); CARRIED 5-1 (result not printed; worked out from the count); ayes: not named in the minutes; nays: Simpson — the City's minutes, p. 4 Corrected to match the minutes, page 4.
to approve Staff's recommendation and give the property owner until March 18, 2023 (30 days) and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Davis, seconded by Hughes); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 5
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Davis, seconded by Hughes); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 5
to amend Staffs recommendation and give the property owner May 18, 2023 (90 days) and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Davis, seconded by Simpson); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 6
to amend Staffs recommendation and give the property owner until August 15, 2023 (180 days) find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Davis, seconded by Brown); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 7
to amend Staff's recommendation and give the property owner May 18, 2023 (90 days) and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Davis, seconded by Simpson); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 7
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Davis, seconded by Simpson); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 8
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Simpson, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 8
to amend staff's recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) (moved by Brown, seconded by Davis); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 9
to amend staffs recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500.00) (moved by Brown, seconded by Simpson); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 10
to amend staff's recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500.00) (moved by Brown, seconded by Simpson); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 11
Motions not adopted (1)
to approve Staff's recommendation and give the property owner until March 18, 2023 (30 days) and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Davis); DENIED — the City's minutes, p. 2
Money named in the minutes' motions (what each motion did with the amount, in its own words)
$100.00 — Code Enforcement: decided in an adopted motion. “amend Staffs recommendation and give the property owner until August 15, 2023 (180 days) for the Roofs & Drainage, Ch 6 Sec. 6-1003 (g) one hundred dollars ($100.00) per days with 30 day updates and approve Staffs recommendation and give the property owner until March 18, 2023 for the other 3 violations listed and find the Property Owner in violation” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (1487_CE_Reg_Minutes_02_16_2023.pdf, p. 3); fiscal period not recorded)
$2,000.00 — Code Enforcement: recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “amend staff's recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00)” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (1487_CE_Reg_Minutes_02_16_2023.pdf, p. 9); fiscal period not recorded)
$2,500.00 — Code Enforcement: recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “amend staffs recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500.00)” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (1487_CE_Reg_Minutes_02_16_2023.pdf, p. 10); fiscal period not recorded)
$2,500.00 — Code Enforcement: recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “amend staff's recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500.00)” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (1487_CE_Reg_Minutes_02_16_2023.pdf, p. 11); fiscal period not recorded)
$50.00 — Code Enforcement: named in a motion for which no result was read. “amend Staffs recommendation and give the property owner until August 15, 2023 (180 days) a fine of fifty dollars ($50.00) per day and find the Property Owner in violation” (motion result: none read; the City's minutes (1487_CE_Reg_Minutes_02_16_2023.pdf, p. 4); fiscal period not recorded)
Agenda (the City's wording)
The City's agenda for this meeting is on file (CE_Reg_Agenda_02_16_2023), but its item list has not been read reliably by machine yet, so no outline is shown.
Transcript Partial transcript
Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have
not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard.
It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's
minutes do that (above).
A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. No recording can be started from here.
503 suspect passage(s) marked in place; inspection incomplete: language review; 1 stretch(es) where a voice was detected and no words were recognized.
How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 23 voices separated from the audio.
56 short machine repair(s) (62 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one.
Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs and whether a voice was detected where the words are. Not completed: language review.
A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 93.2% of 21,465 content words.
Dotted words (486 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading.
503 passages (22% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there.
Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Inspection is incomplete: language review.
Voice detected, no words recognized (1 stretch). Something may have been said here that the transcript does not have:
00:02:39 (6 s) — neither reading has words
Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.
removed. Item number four has been removed. Item number seven has been removed. Item number nine has been removed. Under noncompliance. Item number two has been removed.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:17–00:02:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:02:24–00:02:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
it says Davis nay I want it to be notated that my no vote was because the lien reduction was below the city's cost of enforcement and I'm searching for a second
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:45–00:02:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:51–00:02:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
say is that did go to council and council did uphold staffs costs. They raised it to staffs costs so that's actually ‸ would have been a council and it actually did go back to staffs cost
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:03:08–00:03:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:19–00:03:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:57–00:04:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:08–00:04:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:15–00:04:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:17–00:04:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the property during my visits. They show my findings of business tax receipt. section 12-1 a B for operating a business without a business tax receipt storing outdoor section 6-900 B 11 for miscellaneous trash and commercial items placed throughout the property on the property causing a blight and concern for public safety. Temporary storage, Appendix A, Article 13, Section 30 a 3 for the unpermitted use of storage containers on the property without a permit. District and intent CF general commercial district article 11 section 12 for the prohibited use of the property for the district zoning, the property is owned for retail stores and similar businesses I visited the site 12 times during my first inspection I found the property ‸ violation of the above mentioned sections of the city code I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case but my last inspection on
the property remains in violation I've been working this case since March 1st 2022 had it made attempt to contact the property owner I brought this case before the code enforcement board as I've been working this case for
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:27–00:05:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
certified and posted on the property in violation. Due to the longevity of the case and failure to obtain a business tax receipt, remove the unpermitted temporary storage, and operating an unpermitted business in violation of district zoning, staff finds in case 22-0058 that the owners in violation recommend 30 days to be given to come into compliance or an amended fine of $100 be imposed for each state of violation to remain until compliance is achieved
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:13–00:06:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They stopped contacting me about October, November when they were attempting to get the, going through the process to see if they can get it rezoned. I've checked with planning and zoning and they've informed them they could not get it rezoned. It wasn't going to be eligible for application. And since then, I haven't heard anything until this week.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:07:06–00:07:35 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
And basically what they want to use the property for does not fit the commercial zone that that property is zoned for. So they would have to go through an entire process of attempting to rezone it
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:36–00:07:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:08:07–00:08:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:07]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Good evening board. My name is Carmine Ferraro
[00:08:11]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:11–00:08:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:20]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Carmine Ferraro crossover commercial group
[00:08:26]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:26–00:08:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:31]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
so the reason I'm standing here tonight is I have been asked by the owner to stand in for him for this code enforcement hearing. where we are right now
[00:08:42]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:42–00:08:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:49]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
ago and I am now trying to determine whether or not the tenant can remain on the property we recognize that the code enforcement board has been very cooperative with this I've only been involved in this property on behalf of the owner ‸ twice once about eight months ago and again now as I'm standing before you
[00:09:11]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:11–00:09:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:15]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
I don't believe the property is going to be able to be rezoned and I am not certain whether or not we will get a variance they were going down a road some months ago to try to see if they could obtain a variance when I
[00:09:28]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:28–00:09:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:31]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
she was kind enough to meet me without an appointment. She said she had not had time to look at it.
[00:09:37]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:37–00:09:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:40]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
not able to get back with me.
[00:09:41]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:41–00:09:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:44]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
tonight is
[00:09:45]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:45–00:09:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:52]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
property we will either get the variance or we will have to legally take the steps to remove the tenant Those are the only two possibilities left for us at this time because we do not believe we can get the rezoning.
[00:10:14]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:14–00:10:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:18]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
I don't know if it's a leased tenant or a temporary tenant We're going to go ahead and have whatever documentation that the owner has reviewed legally to determine. and I would imagine in these type of cases if there is ‸ violation it should allow the lease to be canceled if there is a lease if it's a temporary then I believe it would go however the law allows I'm not an attorney so I don't know what that process would be I feel confident that we can either get a variance if the city will grant us that ‸ allowing this use to be able to be there as opposed to no use being there right now and I believe the reason they were going for the variance was I guess prior to this tenant they were having problems with vagrancy and vandalism on that property and when this tenant moved in that went away so I believe
[00:11:12]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:12–00:11:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:17]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:17–00:11:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:18]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
I don't believe she is with the city anymore and they discussed the possibility of a variance to keep the tenant as opposed to having
[00:11:26]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
to
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:11:26–00:11:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:11:26]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
be vacant again and potentially have a vagrancy problem there so that was the road that we're going down
[00:11:32]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:32–00:11:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:36]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
back on board I am a paid consultant for the owner of this property and what he does is he hires me at times to come in and address entitlement issues zoning issues and code enforcement issues so I'm standing before you
[00:11:51]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:51–00:11:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:53]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
but I have very limited information on the property right now
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:56–00:12:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So are you, if you're not an attorney, in what capacity do you represent the owner with regards to assistance with these matters? What, what training, you know, what background do you have that, you know, qualifies you to work to assist people in these matters?
[00:13:23]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:23–00:13:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:31]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
zoning, value adjustment board hearings, and other types of property related matters, code enforcement, special exceptions. I've been practicing for 36 years. I have a series of national clients and I've been representing the Shaw family for five years.
them, but why can't they be here from on behalf of themselves?
[00:14:04]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I can't answer that. I could tell you that I represent them in these kind of matters or others represent them. I, they may have a conflict tonight. I ‸ have no idea why they are not here. I was asked to come to this hearing to make sure
[00:14:18]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:18–00:14:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:22]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:22–00:14:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:00]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Uh, I can tell you as I'm standing here tonight, I will one way or another. Get to the point where I can tell the owner. Whether they can go forward with the variance, if they can go forward with the variance, then they will have to get the variance. Within the amount of time that this board allows before fines commence. I'm asking for that to be 90 days and that way, one way or the other, either a variance can be sought or the tenant will have to be removed.
is it ‸ currently renting for? What's the rent amount?
[00:15:42]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I not certain of what the rent is.
[00:15:45]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:45–00:15:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:09–00:16:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Um, storing outdoors and district and intent. That we go with the staff recommendation of a 30 day period before a fine of a hundred dollars per day be imposed until compliance is achieved.
‸ so, so the tenant there is, is working on their contract, temporary contract for FDOT. And we've had these sites ‸ over the city with Brightline and so forth. We didn't enforce storage on property all up and down us one. So I think we should give this owner 90 days to resolve the issues. I'll make a motion on that. Well, we have two motions.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:56–00:17:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:58–00:18:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
not have a motion, a second, so that motion is denied. Okay. Now we have another motion as Mr. Lightholder's recommendation to give them 90 days to come into compliance. Is there a second?
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:18:13–00:18:27 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Um, code manager. What's the chances of that, this problem going to the border adjustment and getting a variance and having outdoor storage or stuff exposed ‸ in that area there? Is that very likely that that that would be changed and go against all the other retail businesses there?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:59–00:19:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Like in some of the pictures you can see out in the middle of the driveway, ‸ there's deliveries and stuff there that would have to be contained, but we're not even to that point. Um, we have never been given any information on what they're doing as a business.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:29–00:19:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:40–00:19:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Yeah, I think that because they're making money here on this property, it's a ‸ commercial property. They're making money. They're not even disclosing, you know, they're in violation of business tax receipts. That's a problem. And because they're making money, they have a duty to follow the rules more so than someone else because they're there to make a profit.
They're making money here. They're not even reporting it, but they are making money. We know it's leased. It's leased for a certain amount. They're being paid. And they're not following the rules. And like you said, you drove past it. I don't know how many times. It's been ongoing for a long time. I think 30 days is sufficient. I think officer Gonzalez presented an excellent case.
[00:21:00]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Give me one moment here. I had Mr. Lightholders motion. Mr. Brown withdrew his second. Ms. Curtis, did you have a second for it? I'm sorry. My apologies.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:26–00:21:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:37–00:21:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We had one day and everyone else named by Mr. Davis, everyone else voted for. So the motion passes, um, five to one. So, sir, you have 90 days. I would hope that, um, yourself or someone would get with, um, the code board and, um, or the city in reference to the variance to get this taken care of. You have 90 days, please. We will greatly appreciate it. Thank
[00:22:18]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Carmine Ferraro” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:22:20–00:22:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:23:00–00:23:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
photos associated with this case. The photos actually depict the property during my visits and show my findings of accumulation of trash and litter section 6-900 B1 A3D for tires and miscellaneous items throughout the property. Exterior general condition, Section 6-1003 a rotted wood, chipping, peeling paint, weather standing on the structure. The
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:22–00:23:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
darkened areas from water retention. I visited the site six times. During my first inspection, I found the property in violation of the above-mentioned sections of the city code. I have
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:23:42–00:23:52 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:56–00:23:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:01–00:24:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
2022, and it made attempts to contact the property owner. I brought this case before the code enforcement board as I have been working this case for 170 days, and the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:14–00:24:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
certified and posted on the property in violation. Due to the longevity of the case, the blight to the community, and failure to exhibit any progress or make contact with staff after numerous attempts to gain voluntary compliance, staff fines in case 22-0587 that the owner is in violation and recommend 30 days be given to come into compliance or a fine of $100 be imposed for each day the violations remain until compliance is achieved.
Yes, sir. You have some of the tires, which is part of the trash violation. There's some signs on the property here. There's some missing ladies items throughout the yard. The shed, ‸ which ‸ I was speaking of, which showed up between 2021 and 2022.
the worn and missing shingles, and some of the exterior. This violation ‸ shows the same from a different view, including some more of a trash that's located to the right side of the structure and a different view of the roof as well with the weather standing. Thank you. Yes, sir.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:47–00:25:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:50–00:25:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
putting into the backyard, so I can handle that. That's not a big deal, but that the stuff on the right side of the house is a grill, a hot tub, and a table that I do stuff at. That metal, that gray box is not there anymore, and the beige one that's on the left-hand side is not there anymore. I took care of that. Those tires that are across the front fence are from garbage that I pick up in the street and leaned it up against the fence. Three of them are. One of them is mine from my dog. The roof. I bought this property with the intentions of tearing it down and building another thing. I've been saving money so that I don't have to carry a mortgage to do it with. Officer Gonzalez,
have to clean up his trash or outdoor storage and put it in an enclosed structure, get the roof repaired, replaced, looked at, get a permit for the shed that you see here, but there's also, I believe, a container in the back of the property. I'd have to see the property a little better, but just overall clean the property, clean the exterior,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:13–00:27:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:22–00:27:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm helping out a friend. That's all I'm doing. And I know I've got garbage on the left side, but that's stuff from the hurricane that I just haven't had a chance to get out yet.
So that roof within God willing, six to eight months, that house will be getting torn down. I pressure wash that house two, three times a year. That's as clean as it's ever going to get. I
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:27:58–00:27:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
concrete on the right hand side gets pressure washed. I have two dogs. Um, I mean, so I'm doing the best I can do with this property right now until I tear it down and build.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:11–00:28:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So let me, I can't do anything with the roof. There's no missing shingles. That's rolled roofing. It just happens to be discolored probably from the trees above it.
not garbage. It's a table that I work at sometimes. If I'm working on my bike or in my yard, it's blocked by my grill and it's next to my hot tub. I've got my two trash cans there. Anything else is in the, in the, uh, entryway behind that air conditioner right there while there's rooms. And then I've got my little entryway there. Um, the shed, I'll pull a permit for the shed. That red box that you see right there is not even there anymore.
Mr. ‸ Chair, if I can, we're not just talking about the right side of the house. What we're talking about is the tires that are lined up in the front. If
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:29:31–00:29:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
stuff that all just has to go. Nobody's talking about your grill or the stuff you use on the side. We're talking about what we can see here. You can see buckets up by the door, the red machine, which you said is gone, but this picture is from today. I did. And any other scattered items that are scattered along the property. So that's the outdoor storage and trash. The shed is the permit issue.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:18–00:30:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
have two of them. Their favorite toy in the world is a plastic water bottle. So I tend to have plastic water bottles and cardboard boxes in my yard because those are my dog's toys. Now I pick them up once in a while, but that's, that's, that's dog toys. Honest to goodness.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:31:06–00:31:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the roof. Correct. Mr. Chairman, are you okay with us, um, compartmentalizing out the other violations and giving 180 days for the other violation? I would,
would definitely ensure in the motion that, um, they check in with the code enforcement officers to number one, start out to see what the condition of the property is to see, get a detailed one-on-one. So he understands clearly what needs to be done.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:00–00:32:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I don't have a problem with that. I just have very, lately I haven't had any time off. I've been working seven days a week. And when I'm not working, I'm, matter of fact, I'm supposed to be your family tonight, but I'm here.
what I was speaking of the items when you meet with them, with the code enforcement officers to get clarity, to find out exactly what is needed. So the things that are easy to take care of, those can be removed as soon as possible. That's what I was talking about.
And then you can just report to staff every 30 days on your progress so that we can document progress because that will equal time based on their motion.
it's actually starting to retain water under the shingles. Um, so that's going to constitute a roof issue, whether he needs a whole new roof, whether he does a shingle over shingle, that's going to be up to him. He just needs to address the roof. You can also see it around the side of the house where it's splitting. The roof is just old. It's reached its longevity repair. Yeah, he can repair it or replace it.
going to, how, how he's going to handle it based on ‸ his availability and income and stuff. So we're just citing it because the roof is not sufficient right now and there is issues and deficiencies in the roof. And if he keeps in contact with us, he can let us know what his intentions are as, as the chairman stated, and we can do 30 day updates like we've done in the past. That's not a problem.
mean, right now things are better. Roofs are going up pretty quick. We've got several of them. So it's not like it was a year ago. Um, but again, that depends on who you choose to be a roofer and what kind of timeframe they're going to give you. But we're not even there yet because he hasn't even addressed that. But in 180 days or whatever, that could easily be done or at least looked into.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:24–00:35:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
much gone. ‸ It needs another coating. There is membrane sealant that you can get approval from the building department to put up there. That's what I'm saying.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:36:16–00:36:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:18–00:36:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah, just six months on the roof is not an issue. 45 days actually in retrospect on the 100% cleaning the property would be better for me then please.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:10–00:37:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:37:20–00:37:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:28–00:37:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, um, if, if I'm not close enough to the money that I need, I'll just fix the roof. I'll paint it. Essentially. That's what I was thinking was, um, plastic dip essentially. So
you know as well. So there there's avenues in cleaning up what we can and then worrying about the big stuff as we go. So if you create a time frame and he gives us 30 day updates, we can walk them through the process. How
about we go with tabling this to next month, and within that time, you guys get with this gentleman to find out what's going on. So now we can get a clear picture of which direction we
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:59–00:39:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
want to give the time and then now we have to come back. But if we have a definite direction by the next meeting I think we'd be more productive on this property
well I can get the property cleaned up within the next 30 days. here Let me think about this because this weekend I'm working Saturday my brother and my nephew are in town I'm going to a little league and the following weekend I have to go to Tampa to work and then I mean it's again the time off to actually spend five or six hours in that yacht is hard to find and
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:41–00:39:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:47–00:39:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
like that okay so I'm going to move that we get fined based on the evidence provided by Officer Gonzalez and his testimony and pictures provided that there is a violation for accumulation of trash and litter, exterior general condition, and permit required. And that we provide 30 days to remedy the violation or a $100 fine per day be imposed until compliance is achieved I also move that we find that based on the evidence from officer Gonzalez testimony and the pictures provided that there is a violation of
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:40:30–00:40:30 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:41–00:40:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Mr. Chair may I just I just want to let the board know you are free to offer any fine that you want staff is merely making a recommendation and staff generally goes along with the $25 a day per violation but it is your duty under the Florida statutes to look at the violations, consider the gravity of the violations and make your own determination what you feel an appropriate fine is
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:41:40–00:41:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:56–00:42:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
let me be clear Mr. Lightholder his recommendation was to accept staff recommendation for 30 days for accumulation of trash exterior condition and permit required ‸ but 180 days for the roofs and drainage correct
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:49–00:43:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:43:45–00:43:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:43:51–00:43:52 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:52–00:43:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Section 3. For the unpermitted use of the of the property, including a campground for transients. The unpermitted use of the property have resulted in 56 active calls from law enforcement for service since June of 2022. Those service calls those calls for service range from assault to drug use and overdose. I visited the site seven times. During my first inspection, I found the property in violation of the above mentioned section to the city code.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:35–00:44:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to contact the property owner. I ‸ brought the case before the code enforcement borders. i've been working this case for 170 days. The violations have not been fully resolved. I sent the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:48–00:44:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
2023, and it was sent certified and posted on the property in violation. Due to the longevity of this case, the blight to the community, failure to exhibit any progress, make contact with staff after numerous attempts to gain voluntary compliance and concern for public safety. Staff finds in
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:06–00:45:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:11–00:45:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
be imposed for each day the violations remain until compliance is achieved. The reason for the amended fine amount is due to the concern for public health and safety caused by the property in question and also the violation for the permit required is rescinded.
the property Is there anyone here for the property? um Because my concern, um I have a really special interest in this case because we have kids that walk by there um every morning. um I walked, I drove past some of my kids this morning um and I've been having concerns because this picture here really concerns me because this is what I saw this morning um at
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:58–00:46:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
when I was passing by. um I had five kids and a parent walking by this property and, um dogs out there. And so this is really, um a nuisance, a definite ‸ public nuisance. And this is the prime spot for anything could happen to the kids as they're walking by. um so I would definitely love to see someone about this property, but, um so as far as I'm just putting that out
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:41–00:46:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
given time. um every tarp that you see is a camp that people camp plus the sheds. They're using the sheds back there to live in. So like in this picture alone, this is just taken this morning of the people and there is
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:59–00:46:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:59–00:47:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:00–00:47:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:00–00:47:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:00–00:47:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:01–00:47:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:01–00:47:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:03–00:47:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:47–00:47:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
15 days. I was notified by the attorney that we can provide 15 days. And I think that because this is at a school bus stop that um it's appropriate to do it in a more urgency. Okay.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:21–00:48:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:37–00:48:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:17–00:49:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:49:24–00:49:24 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:30–00:49:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:34–00:49:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:39–00:49:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:44–00:49:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:48–00:49:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
during my first inspection, I found the property ‸ violation of the above mentioned sections of the city code. I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case as my last inspection this morning on February 16th, 2023, the property remains in violation.
results I brought this case before the code enforcement board as I've been working this case for 169 days. The violations have not been fully resolved. I sent the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:25–00:50:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
certified and posted on the property in violation. Staff finds in case 22-0611 that the owner is in violation and recommend 30 days be given to come into
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:37–00:50:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:49–00:50:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words the first reading may have missed · 00:51:02–00:51:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:09–00:51:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that I have patched with the board, everything. I am retired. I only live on Social Security. I do not have the money or the insurance. I do not have property insurance. It was canceled on me and everything. So I do not have the money to get up there and re repair or even replace the roof. And I keep the yard up as much as I can. um It might be sometimes before I cut my yard and everything, but I try to keep it as whenever I can. I get out there sometimes. I get tired an awful lot and everything because my health's not in the best of
‸ yes if he stopped by community services and spoke with the housing division they could point him to ship or other roof programs there's also state programs that they could probably give to him because the bigger concern here is understanding the lack of money but the roof is in really bad condition and the area that's covered by a tarp is where he attempted to make a repair which actually went into the sheathing so his safety is more important than that but yes I would recommend and I haven't had a
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:57–00:53:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
would recommend that he seek help from the housing division to see what is available to him to get his roof fixed now there may be a waiting period on that so please take that into consideration
Usually it's a waiting list. um I'm assuming that they will look at the severity and the conditions and take that into consideration um depending on what program he gets. I do know like I said there's state and then there's local uh money given to the housing department but he would have to check all that out um for himself.
take them a little bit to get an answer from those agencies and information is probably going to take a little while. So that would be my recommendation. I
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:10–00:54:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:11–00:54:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
sir. Officer initiated? Yes sir. Okay. Yeah we received a complaint on park and we swept the street. A couple of the park cases had already come to the board previously. Yes. This is one we've been kind of trying to work with. um So that's why it's kind of taking a little bit longer. Okay.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:54:43–00:54:44 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:54:50–00:54:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Yes, it's for the repair that he did because it goes underneath. It's where the tarp is and he tried to make a repair with wood and stuff and none of that was inspected or approved. And it's it's in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:55:03–00:55:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
would like to say I did try to contact community services last October and they had a waiting list until like July of this this year. And then I called an ‸ organization down in Palm Bay, which has a veterans uh program in there and left a message with them and
They're sort of like a habitat for humanity where if you help them work, then they they do stuff for you and then you replay them back by helping with life everything. But I haven't heard back from them at all. So i there's two places i've hadcontactedto try to get a hold of since last October and all. but‸ Like I say,
is a time frame to which you can come into compliance. uh Because we, we like voluntarily, we like people to come into compliance voluntarily rather than for them to rack up a lot of fines, especially resident owners. um We want to work with you. We want to set timelines that are reasonable that work for you
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:57:06–00:57:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Yeah. Well, my biggest problem, I'm willing to work with anything and do anything. But my biggest problem is if I have to shut out money for this, I can't do it.
and i have contacts there and resources so i would be happy to reach out and see where that is and make sure somebody gets back to him on that And I can also help out trying to be a liaison with housing here and see if somebody can reach out for him and we'll try to help
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:57:46–00:57:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:58:02–00:58:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:09–00:58:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:23–00:58:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:26–00:58:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:02–00:59:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:29–00:59:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:59:34–00:59:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:39–00:59:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words the first reading may have missed · 00:59:52–01:00:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Item number six. I'm sorry. um sir, please ensure you, um get with Mr. Bunt. um because he's trying to help you from some of his professional contacts. So please ensure you work with him, please. Thank you very much. And you have a good one, sir. thank
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:39–01:00:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos actually depict the property during my visits and show my findings of exterior general condition.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:54–01:00:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:02–01:01:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:10–01:01:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and shingles throughout the roof and darkened areas from water retention. uh specifically around the carport area. I visited the site six times during my first inspection. I found the property in violation of the above mentioned sections of the city code. I've attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as my last inspection this morning, February 16th, 2023, the property remains in violation.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:01:37–01:01:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:01:46–01:01:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:46–01:01:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:01:53–01:01:53 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:01–01:02:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:12–01:02:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:24–01:02:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:12–01:03:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:32–01:03:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:42–01:03:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:03:46–01:03:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:48–01:04:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Motion passes. um just mr dennis please just ensure that you get with uh mr gonzalez to ensure that once this is completed you contact him so this can be remedied and
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:04:23–01:04:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:08–01:05:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Folger, Code Enforcement Officer. I am submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits and show my findings of uh permit required. Appendix A, Article 15, Section 2 a Parking in the Yard,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:49–01:05:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:59–01:06:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We found the property in violation of the above mentioned sections of the City Code. We've attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection, February
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:10–01:06:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:16–01:06:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:17–01:06:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I brought this this case before the Code Enforcement Board as we have been working on this case for 157 days, and the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent notice of hearing on January
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:33–01:06:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:38–01:06:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
violation and recommends 30 days be given to come into compliance or an amended fine of 50 be imposed for each day. The violation remains until compliance is achieved.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:00–01:07:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:04–01:07:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:07–01:07:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:36–01:07:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
June. And then I said, you don't need that to build. And he said, no, not as long as it's not. And he's a construction worker. As long as it's not connected and it's
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:48–01:07:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:55–01:07:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:10–01:08:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
or like, so last week, you gotta move it. So I emptied it out and somebody just came and moved it last Sunday. So, um but as far as the cars, I didn't know you can't park. coffee I just don't know. I've been there 25 years, but I'm overwhelmed. I teach 15 autistic kids a day. So by the time I get home, I'm worn out.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:33–01:08:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:08:49–01:08:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you need to extend your driveway over where you'll be, you'll be legal. So for the parking in the yard, do that, but don't put mulch down because that's not an acceptable substance. oh
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:11–01:09:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
yard. A couple of the cars I need to get rid of, but ‸ only three of them are really, well, they all run, but the white truck is just, it's a Ford Ranger and I'm holding it hostage for my son's dead father's other son that owes money, whatever. But, um I can get rid of those too.
Well, miss Wilson, so do you think that it would take you longer than 30 days to get the cars out of the yard? Because that's really the remaining violations that you have.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:10–01:10:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:36–01:10:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'll pay you. And I give him 200 bucks. And he's like, I got all that stuff hauled out. But I had to leave my dad's tires there. I'm like, you left more junk. I couldn't fit in the truck. ‸ like, anyway, he was supposed to be there 6 30 this morning. I said, I just talked to the
oh I was so mad last night. Well, so mad for me. But I'm cleaning up all this stuff with the flashlight at night time And I'm like, none of this is me. None of this is me. None of this is me. I swear. It's like people I help like Adam
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:21–01:11:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:32–01:11:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:04–01:12:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:23–01:12:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:41–01:12:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm submitted a pack of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos actually depict the property during my visits and show my ‸ findings of section 20-58 parking, inspection buses, large trucks and residential areas are on streets. I visited the site 10 times during my first inspection. I found the property in violation of the above mentioned sections of the city code. I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection on 2 16 2023 the property remains in violation. I have been working this case since 8 9 of 2022, and I have been in contact with the property owner. I brought this case before the code enforcement board, as I have been working this case for 191 days, and the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent the notice of hearing on 1 4 2023 and it was since certified and posted on the property in violation. Staff finds in this case 22-0491 that the owner is in violation and recommends 30 days the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:13:48–01:13:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:14:06–01:14:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:09–01:14:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:14:17–01:14:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:14:22–01:14:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:14:23–01:14:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:14:31–01:14:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:14:47–01:14:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:52–01:15:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:15:15–01:15:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ So, officer Bonacore, is it your testimony that the parking of this large orange truck here is not in compliance with the code for that residential area? That is correct. At any time, it could never be parked there. That is correct.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:15:50–01:15:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:09–01:16:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the weight, the gross vehicle weight, and the usage of the vehicle. Okay. It's not registered with DMV as a recreational vehicle. So, that is why it's not considered like an RV. Are there other places available in the community where it could
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:16:34–01:16:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
‸ we've been inclined as a board to work with property owners, residents that are living in their own homes here. And if you think you need more than 30 days, I don't think that would be a problem for the board. But we would need to know how much time you think you would need to come into compliance.
So, it's reasonable to believe that you could contact them before you leave to let them know you're leaving so they can come by. And when you're gone, it could be taken off. Well, you just
stays there for a while. He goes on the road, but he brings it home. What needs to be done is when he comes back from the road, he can't park it at the residential.
Yeah, to come home, if I drop the puppies off and I drop my things off, but, you know, I'm not married, never been married, so I have nobody to come pick me up to take me home. You know, I just got to find a place to park it. But like I said, I've been parking it there for 15 years since I've owned the house.
same issue? Officer Michael Mack actually had the case, the same case that we have here tonight, back in 2014, but the problem, again, was they would come out, truck would be gone for a while, they'd close the case. So this has kind of been an ongoing situation in the neighborhood. That case with Officer Mack involved
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:16–01:19:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:18–01:19:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:19:24–01:19:24 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:19:33–01:19:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They're mainly for delivery. If you were having a delivery or moving your house, they could come, but they can't be parked or stored there based on the size and weight.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:20:37–01:20:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:21:20–01:21:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:21:36–01:21:36 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:22:20–01:22:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:22:38–01:22:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:26–01:23:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:23:50–01:23:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:23:57–01:24:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:10–01:24:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:24–01:24:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm submitting a pack of documents and photos associated with this case The photos accurately depict the property during my visits and show my findings of roof and drainages.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:25:03–01:25:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:25:18–01:25:19 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
as I have been working this case for 153 days and the violations have not been fully resolved I sent a notice of hearing on 1-11-2023 and it was since certified, and posted on the property in violation. Staff finds in case 22-0645 that the owner is in violation and recommends 30 days be given to come into compliance
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:25:57–01:26:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:17–01:26:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:12–01:27:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of you for being here ‸ I'm sorry if somebody else read this for me this I'll try first I want to thank everybody for the this opportunity to explain my situation and ask for your understanding and hopefully assistance. To start with I have absolute I absolutely want to become compliant with the code requirements here in Cocoa I am ashamed of the condition of my roof and I am determined to do all I can to become ‸ compliant as soon as I possibly can
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:43–01:28:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:50–01:28:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
had the money I could have immediately hired a roofing contractor and there ‸ would have been no further problem in fact if I had the money the roof never would have developed to deteriorate to its current state of disrepair. But since this kind of money is not available, I'm having to replace this roof by myself I don't even have the money to order a roll-off dumpster to help me with tearing off the old roof. Due to the extended ‸ time it will take me to replace this roof by myself, a roll-away dumpster
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:38–01:29:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to me is my health I am in my 70s and I have numerous health challenges periodically have severe back pain coming on for no apparent reason and disabling me for ‸ sometimes for days even as I wear knee and back braces on October of
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:30:13–01:30:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
me in the emergency unit and did extensive tests, including a brain scan. and ‸ about a year ago I was having severe feet and leg pain I researched it on the internet and the symptoms led me to believe I may have had peripheral arterial disease a disease which can lead to amputations because of these and other physical challenges I am currently having numerous tests and procedures done I have had blood stool and urine tests done along with other tests
And shortly after that, they would schedule a colonoscopy. The endoscopy is due to me having a hiatal hernia, which gives me problems eating at times and may have developed into something much more serious.
I have three teeth that are currently giving me problems, and I have lost numerous other teeth over time due to the lack of money. Fortunately, I now have a Brazilian wife, Sandra, who along with her family, want to help me have all of my teeth removed and replaced with false teeth done in Brazil. I can never afford to have this major operation done here in the U.S. as the cost would be astronomical. ‸ In Brazil, it would be much cheaper and doable. With the help of my wife and her family, please understand that I am not complaining as it is what it is, and it's up to me to deal with my challenges as best I can. I am only sharing all of this with you ‸ to help give you an understanding as to why my roof is the way it is. Now I want to share my determination to become compliant. As I haven't been able to make much progress due to my lack of money,
Years ago, I acquired my mother's house in Virginia, but sadly it has been sitting empty until recently. Now due to spending eight months up there painting, cleaning, doing yard work, etc., I
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:38–01:33:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All of this causes me massive hardship, which I'm determined to conquer. Again, what I now need is time, and I'm hoping you can be understanding of my current situation and see fit to
Brazil. I feel this should be enough time for me to finish my new roof and bring my house totally up to code. As you can see from the photos, I love having a beautiful property, and my neighbors have complimented me numerous times for how ‸ good it has looked.
them over the ground, my one neighbor even used my flowers as a backdrop to photos of her daughter. Thank you so very much for your time and consideration.
Mr. Chair? Yes, sir. If I can, I just want to throw this out there because ‸ he actually did obtain a permit when we cited him the last time, and that permit went on for two years and expired.
in March. So even if we were to give him more time, his roof permit is not going to be valid after March, and I forget the exact day. They extended it 90 days. So he's actually had a permit to close out a previous code violation, and it was open for two years, and that expired the permit, and then the building official just recently gave him before. Mr. Obler has been before this board, and we've been dealing with Mr. Obler and fascia and roof issues since 2014. So that's where we, I just wanted to throw that out there because even if we give him 90 days, he wouldn't have a valid permit unless the building official kept doing it, and that's kind of major when the permit has expired after two years.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:36:27–01:36:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Can I make a comment in regards to that? My understanding when I pulled the permit was if I get the first inspection within the first time period, then I would have six months after that to complete the job. Is that correct or incorrect?
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:37:04–01:37:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
got an inspection, like a sheeting inspection, he'd be more inclined to extend you again after that, but it's written on your ‸ permit that you went in that March,
within six months, that moves you to the next stage and the next stage and the next stage. He pulled his permit over two years ago, and it actually went into expiration. So that would depend on what he's done
he really hasn't done much on the roof, and I don't know where he's going to be, so I don't want the board to give him 90 days, and then he has no permit, and then ‸ he's stuck because we'd have to cite him for work without a permit.
So when I did renew this permit, they did tell me if I got the inspection done within the first 90 days, that I would have six months. They did tell me that because I asked
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:38:08–01:38:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Okay, but again, you need to call for an inspection by March 15th, otherwise your permit's going to expire, and it's not going to get renewed because it's already been renewed once.
am having to do the whole roof by myself, and I was told that I could, you know, like do a third of the roof, the sheeting and stuff, have it inspected, and then do another third of the roof, and I was told that...
And just like I did back in 2018, I just want you to fix your roof because it's only going to get worse. So I don't want you to be under that impression and then have the permit expire because then we have another issue. Your permit right now just says valid till March 15th. It doesn't say 90 days.
If you can get that, that's great. If the board wants to give you 90 days, that's great. But I just want you to be aware that your permit is on the clock and it's ticking, and you may not have a valid permit in 90 days. That's all I wanted to put on the record.
Well, Mr. Obler, can you commit today here at this hearing that if your permit does expire, that you'll apply for a new permit? Absolutely. Okay. Okay. And this is another case where we have a roof, resident, owner. ‸ We've done 180 days on the past two cases.
So I move that based on the testimony provided by Officer Bonacore and the photos provided that we find that there's a violation of roofs and drainage, Chapter 6, Section 6-1003, And that we provide 180 days to remedy the violation or a fine of $25 per day be imposed until compliance is achieved.
I'll second. ‸ I've got a question. Can the permit be reapplied for each time and the person pays for the permit? Can that be done? Or ‸ once you get a permit and you don't use it up, you can't get another one?
can't continuously do that for the same job over and over. He's going to deny you. In this case, I can't answer for the building official, but yes, he would probably let him pull a brand new roof permit.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:42:11–01:42:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
photos accurately depict the property during my visit and show my findings of accumulation of trash and litter, Section 6, Chapter 6, Section 6-900, B1, A through D. Store and junk for autos, Chapter 6, Section 6-902,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:42:32–01:42:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I visited the site seven times. During my first inspection, I found the property in violation of the above-mentioned sections of the City Code. I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case. That is of my last inspection on 2-16-2023. The property remains in violation. I have been working this case since 10-19 of 2022, and I have been in contact with the property owner. I brought this case before the Code Enforcement Board, as I have been working this case for 89 days, and the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:07–01:43:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and it was ‸ certified and posted on the property in violation. Staff finds in case 22-0768 that the owner is in violation and recommends 30 days be given to come into compliance or a fine of $50 be imposed for each day the violations remain until compliance is achieved.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:37–01:43:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They don't pick it up. It was bigger than that, and I picked up most of it and put it in the trash can. But why haven't they picked it up? I don't know. I'm working to get everything done, taken care of. The red truck runs. I need to do a little work
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:24–01:44:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
been fighting with the insurance company to get physical therapy for ‸ pelvic floor, and there's only one in Brevard County that can actually do that, and the insurance company ‸ would not approve it. They approved it, and
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:40–01:44:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And just looking at the pile, they're not going to pick it up because you have to separate wood from tree debris from the plastic tarp. So I believe his problem with not getting it picked up is a separation issue. I
But I'll pick that up and put it in the trash can and get it gone, or I've got a trailer now. I can get it to the dump. I'll do something with it. So the violation is
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:46:27–01:46:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:47:13–01:47:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
we would cite that as well because it's out in the open and it's not in a fully enclosed building. So it's still an unregistered, unserviceable vehicle on the property.
All right. I'll move that we find that there is, based on the testimony from Officer Bonacore and the photos provided, that there's a violation ‸ for an accumulation of trash and litter in this case and storing of junk autos, and that we provide 90 days for remedy or a fine of $50 per day until compliance is achieved. Second.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:40–01:48:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:49:20–01:49:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm submitting photos that I took during my re-inspections of the property. They actually depict the property during my visits. This case was brought to the Code Board on August 18, 2022, and was found in violation of permit required, Appendix A, Article 15, Section 2A, for unpermitted alterations made to the property. Site plan approval required, Appendix A, Article 13, 1B, for a required site plan approval for the current use and business on the property.
the notice of hearing for noncompliance on February 2, 2023, and it was sent certified and posted. Staff would like to make note to the Board members that the property was nonconforming for use until the property owner made unpermitted additions and alterations to the property, removing its nonconforming status.
made, an evaluation could not be properly conducted and that a restoration plan or a new site plan would be needed. To sum up staff's case, the property was cited to obtain permits and a site plan for the improvements made to the site. This case became focused on the added dirt.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:08–01:51:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And Mr. Chairman, if I can, this is a noncompliance hearing. The issue with this property got focused on the dirt during previous cases and discussions. However, it's a vacant property. It's listed with the property appraiser as a vacant property. It did have a nonconforming use for storage of like trucks and overflow,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:51:41–01:51:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
adding the containers, which are an accessory, the shed, which is an accessory, No permits can be obtained because there's no address on the property and there's no business tax receipt. That was not addressed at the last hearing when it was tabled. As far as removal of the dirt, a lot of the dirt is still there. and the city engineer,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:52:02–01:52:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:52:09–01:52:09 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
know what they're returning it back to and since there's not an active site plan, they can't go by that either. So this is a property that's being used for business that has no address, no primary structures, nothing.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:52:35–01:52:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:52:42–01:52:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:52:45–01:52:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I am in compliance. To be in compliance, I was told to remove the dirt that was brought in, that at that time I was given permission to do it. And there's an email in the system showing that I was given permission. So I removed all the dirt. It was like about 200 yards of material. And I'm into the hot pan or what do you call that? It's, you can't even dig into it. It's been there forever. So, but I, that area has been cleaned up. And there's no compliance issues.
And that, those were the two conditions at the last hearing. And that's all. There was no additional talk of, um, any shed or containers. This is the first I hear of this. When I purchased that property, the shed was there. That was, that was existing. You can see it on Google Earth, on the maps. It's going back 20 years. And when I purchased that property, I was assigned an address of 3360, Tri-City Avenue. It's on record.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:55:14–01:55:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
These things, I don't know where they're coming up with this. But I even have, I have a copy of all that stuff at my home. Because that's where I do all the paperwork. But I also post it ‸ in that little shed. I keep that paperwork in the shed. Because I know you're required to keep your business tax receipt on the site.
was fenced in when I purchased it. But it needed repairs. So, the company came in and they made the repairs necessary. Now, two properties on each side of me. Their fences have fallen down. I've made a special point to the police department.
Nothing has been done. Actually, the complaintant, the one that complained about me bringing the dirt in is where the fence has almost completely fallen. down. And it's because of overgrowth of Brazilian pepper trees. And that's an invasive species, as you know. I'm hired contracts all the time to remove that species. ‸ people behind me, even though I made police department aware of it, they're not required to remove the species.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:57:07–01:57:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:57:20–01:57:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
This is, This is the issue that I have at this very moment. We've been beating this dead horse for months. So this hearing is only for compliance or noncompliance. At this time, we had a picture taken from today and at this point, you are still in noncompliance. So the only thing here and I don't feel, I don't want you to feel like I'm coming off rule but we're still, like I said, we're beating a dead horse.
This is one of those matters you're going to have to, between your lawyer and the city lawyer and the engineer, you guys are going to have to go with that. So at this point, I'll take a motion. We're either in noncompliance
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:59:11–01:59:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:59:12–01:59:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:59:39–01:59:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:59:59–02:00:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So now, So now you work with us. If you have all that information, a permit for the shed and all that, get with us and we'll deal with it. But I'm going to be honest with you.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:01:01–02:01:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:01:15–02:01:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:01:27–02:01:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:01:32–02:01:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
6-902-B12 for the storage of unserviceable and unregistered vehicles on the property, storing outdoors for chairs, trash, and miscellaneous outdoor storage items throughout the property. The board ordered compliance date was November
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:01:45–02:01:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:01:49–02:01:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:02:12–02:02:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:02:26–02:02:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:02:53–02:02:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:03:06–02:03:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:03:16–02:03:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:03:42–02:03:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:03:57–02:04:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:04:02–02:04:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:04:06–02:04:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:04:11–02:04:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:04:15–02:04:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
with ‸ Code Enforcement Board's order, ‸ lien ‸ was placed, I'm sorry, was imposed against the property effective 6-17-2016. The lien ran at $250 per day from June 17, 2016 until compliance was ‸ achieved
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:04:34–02:04:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:04:39–02:04:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:04:56–02:04:56 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:05:02–02:05:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to the subject lien, 15. Number of inspections performed, nine. Property taxes, the taxes have been paid through 2022. Other liens records show no outstanding liens on the property, no water liens. Property inspection on February 14, 2023. It was in compliance before the Code Board
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:05:28–02:05:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:05:36–02:05:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Right, and they already paid that. They took care of that. This case was running, but it wasn't fixed, so the property got in such disrepair that I contacted the building official and we condemned the property and it went through the process and ended up being condemned. Mr. Phillips did show up to contest the demolition amount and was denied. He has since passed away and the property went through probate and whatever and has since changed hands as a vacant lot, but when this happened, there was a home on it, so they're asking for... The new owner is asking for a reduction so they can follow through with everything.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:06:42–02:06:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:07:07–02:07:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:07:23–02:07:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
do. If you look at the number at the top where it talks about the code officer, that's their salary plus the benefits that HR gives us. That's where we came up with those amounts. Okay.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:30–02:08:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:41–02:08:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:08:42–02:08:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:08:53–02:09:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:09:27–02:09:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:09:32–02:09:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:09:40–02:09:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:09:59–02:09:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:10:00–02:10:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in violation of the following. Accessory structure, section 6-1001G, accumulation of trash and litter, section 6-900B1A3D, protective treatment, section 6-1003B, and weed, section 6-1001D. The code enforcement board provided the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:10:18–02:10:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
sufficient time to correct said violation, therefore consistent with the code enforcement board's order, lien was imposed against the property, effective March 17, 2022. ‸ The lien ran at $100 per day from April 17, 2022 until compliance is achieved on January 9, 2023. Code records show on-site inspections were conducted by myself.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:10:43–02:10:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:10:48–02:10:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is requesting the lien to reduce to $0 total forgiveness. Staff utilized the following factors in making its recommendation to reduce the lien. Whether the current owner owned the property at
violations occurred, yes. Applicant resides at the property, yes. The number of violations related to the subject lien, four. Number of inspections performed, nine. Property taxes, Taxes have been paid through 2022. Other liens, records show no outstanding liens in the property, no water liens. Property inspection, February 14th, and it was in compliance before the Code ‸ Enforcement board hearing. ‸ Inspection will occur prior to the council meeting. Current market value of the subject property, The current market value is $106,690.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:11:31–02:11:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to reduce to $2,384.14, which is the cost of staff to prosecute this case. This reduction is based on the gravity of ‸ violations, the length of time it took for the property to come into compliance, and the total amount of the city's cost.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:11:59–02:12:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
applies to both cases. They're the same exact case number with the same exact issue. So those are the two separate fines. Are those two separate fines combined
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:12:15–02:12:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:12:19–02:12:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:12:36–02:12:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:12:41–02:12:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 02:12:47–02:12:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:14:41–02:14:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:14:48–02:14:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I have seen the city of Cocoa grow since 1992 to now. I ‸ did retire right now so ‸ I've been retired for a few years. ‸ Honestly, I have to say ‸ just one thing, just seeing people in the cases that's been reviewed today, it's just my personal opinion. I think the code enforcement people really work hard and they do ‸ their job well and they communicate well. But the thing that I have a problem with is that I see a lot of people struggle coming. ‸ This is my first time being in this hearing. I haven't been in one for ‸ never.
If I own a commercial property, I'm not going to be living in it. Let's say it's closed or no longer in business. They don't even have access to send mail to ‸ other residents or search you.
address and know where you're at. I'm like, what? But how could it be? He said, it's not our job. You're supposed to call the county and get your address changed on the properties you own. I said, well, I own a lot of properties and I know as a lien, as a, you know, you have any moving address or address you file through the city or the county or the state, it becomes public information. Why can't you just go up and look at it? I wasn't even aware of none of these violations.
even exist with that. I come and check on a property every three months and look over. I've dealt a lot of problems with homeless people living and staying and hiding and throwing trash and that's what caused the problem. It's not me negligent,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:17:29–02:17:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you know, homeless people around. And I've worked with the city of Cocoa, the city police, they helped me out. We helped, we worked it, we got it better, but if I was aware, yes, weed will grow, He must have taken a picture at the time of the year,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:17:46–02:17:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:17:57–02:17:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
I wasn't in violation. I did not know about it. I wasn't even aware of it that exists. By me seeing a violation label on my door because I have a car or two
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:18:19–02:18:19 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
These big business people, they're not going to wait. They won't wait. So now I'm back to square one just because the code enforcement has no access to go look for me.
Mr. Chairman, just for the record, as per chapter 162, we do look at the property appraiser's record and we send it to the address on the property appraiser as far as our mail. If the address on the property appraiser is wrong, Mr.
would have to fix that. But we also post the property before every hearing as shown in this picture before the hearing. So we send certified mail plus we post just in case they don't get it. So we followed the statute. He's referring to the fact that the address that reflected on the property appraiser was not his address any longer. But we have to go by what's on the tax rolls and what's in the property appraiser, and that's what we did.
told you, we go by the property appraiser and the address that's on the property appraiser. That's what we, you know, that's what we send the mail to. But we also post the property of the violation to try to obtain notice. And we do that for every case. We do both services. We do certified and posting.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:20:27–02:20:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:20:37–02:20:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah, I agree. It's in a high traffic area of the city that, you know, if you lived in the city that you would probably drive past this every day if you drive on US 1 ever.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:21:15–02:21:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:21:32–02:21:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:22:05–02:22:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
floor for ‸ lien be reduced to $5,000 by Mr. Brown, second by Mr. Simpson. All in favor say aye. Aye. Those opposed? Motion passes unanimously for $5,000, sir. So
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:22:32–02:22:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:22:46–02:22:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. I still would like to see if you guys will do anything to allow this code enforcement to locate people. If this, I was notified with, it would have been done within a week. Like when they notify me about, when I found out, I took care of that property in less than a week, taken care of. But they need to have a way to get hold of people that could avoid all this and avoid less work for you, and less work for them, and less hassle ‸ for the citizen of the town.
Well, sir, thank you for your comments. And I think that our officers do diligently search for the owners of property as a part of the normal course of their job. Like he said,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:24:14–02:24:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Well, a part of your duty as the property owner is to make sure that your address and your contact information stays up to date with the county. I did. So they rely on those records and those records rely on you to update your own records. And we all are responsible for updating our own records on property that we own. There's a lot of people here in this room. Most of us own property and we all update our own records.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:24:55–02:24:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:25:17–02:25:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:25:18–02:25:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording